Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members

Please allow me to summarize this long email. "We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do". Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members. We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej? Daniel~ On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
[1] https://www.ripe.net/membership/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2024/documentation-...
[2] https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/

On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
That's a very realistic tl;dr from Ondřej's mail. And I am still completely disappointed in what RIPE NCC and its board are doing. "You have the right to disagree, but still, we don't care, and we'll move on with what we decided, even if we are sitting on a big financial reserve which could offer us some time to find better solutions" -- Clément Cavadore

Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board? "This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...." They just don't want to listen to us. On 5/7/24 9:08 AM, Clement Cavadore wrote:
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do". That's a very realistic tl;dr from Ondřej's mail. And I am still completely disappointed in what RIPE NCC and its board are doing.
"You have the right to disagree, but still, we don't care, and we'll move on with what we decided, even if we are sitting on a big financial reserve which could offer us some time to find better solutions"

Hello, It seems so. I had the same feeling of being ignored when I asked if equalizing status of every resource holder (PI, PA, legacy) was viable solution for stabilizing income. Best regards, Łukasz Jarosz wt., 7 maj 2024, 16:15 użytkownik Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> napisał:
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board?
"This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...."
They just don't want to listen to us.
On 5/7/24 9:08 AM, Clement Cavadore wrote:
On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do". That's a very realistic tl;dr from Ondřej's mail. And I am still completely disappointed in what RIPE NCC and its board are doing.
"You have the right to disagree, but still, we don't care, and we'll move on with what we decided, even if we are sitting on a big financial reserve which could offer us some time to find better solutions"
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/lukasz%40jarosz.pl

On 7 May 2024, at 16:13, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board?
"This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...."
They just don't want to listen to us.
If you define “listening to us” as “I must have it my way”, then no. Democracy is not "getting your own will", or the will of those who shout the loudest. Otherwise you may disagree, that’s your right. Michel LANNERS CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. -- <https://www.luxchat.lu/> Mail: michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu <mailto:michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu> Luxchat: @3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 LU-CIX Management G.I.E. 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F L-3290 Bettembourg lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu/> luxchat.lu <https://www.luxchat.lu/> luxembourg-internet-days.com <https://luxembourg-internet-days.com/> lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu/>

Hi Michael, This proposal that I have linked, had the support of 702 individual voting LIRs. That's more folks voicing their concern than usually votes in the regular annual meetings. https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ It's not just my voice, it's the voice of a significant portion of the membership base who have been told your opinion carries no weight, we gave you a feel good process and will include it but not allow members to vote on it. Daniel~ On 5/7/24 10:26 AM, Michel Lanners wrote:
On 7 May 2024, at 16:13, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board?
"This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...."
They just don't want to listen to us.
If you define “listening to us” as “I must have it my way”, then no.
Democracy is not "getting your own will", or the will of those who shout the loudest.
Otherwise you may disagree, that’s your right.
*Michel LANNERS* CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. -- <https://www.luxchat.lu/> Mail: michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu Luxchat: @3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 *LU-CIX Management G.I.E.* 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F L-3290 Bettembourg lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu> luxchat.lu <https://www.luxchat.lu> luxembourg-internet-days.com <https://luxembourg-internet-days.com> lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

Hi Daniel, as Michael said, currently, there are 766 members registered to vote at the GM and 702 members support the proposal "keep the current charging model". IMHO this is a VERY clear indication that this is a significant proposal. (Of course, not all supporters would vote yes to the proposal and these 702 aren't necessarily the same as the 766) Regards, Claudius On 07.05.24 17:26, Michel Lanners wrote:
On 7 May 2024, at 16:13, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board?
"This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...."
They just don't want to listen to us.
If you define “listening to us” as “I must have it my way”, then no.
Democracy is not "getting your own will", or the will of those who shout the loudest.
Otherwise you may disagree, that’s your right.
*Michel LANNERS* CIO at LU-CIX Management G.I.E. -- <https://www.luxchat.lu/> Mail: michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu <mailto:michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu> Luxchat: @3eb2pdflrq57:01.lu-cix.luxchat.lu Phone: (+352) 28 99 29 92-81 *LU-CIX Management G.I.E.* 202, Z.A.E. Wolser F L-3290 Bettembourg lu-cix.lu <https://www.lu-cix.lu> luxchat.lu <https://www.luxchat.lu> luxembourg-internet-days.com <https://luxembourg-internet-days.com> lunog.lu <https://www.lunog.lu>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/claudius.zingerli%40k...
-- Kantonsschule Zug Informatik Luessiweg 24 6300 Zug claudius.zingerli@ksz.ch Tel: +41 41 728 1212 Direkt: +41 41 728 1307

On 7 May 2024, at 17:26, Michel Lanners <michel.lanners@lu-cix.lu> wrote:
On 7 May 2024, at 16:13, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the board?
"This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...."
They just don't want to listen to us.
If you define “listening to us” as “I must have it my way”, then no.
Democracy is not "getting your own will", or the will of those who shout the loudest.
Otherwise you may disagree, that’s your right.
In a representative democratic system the voters elect representatives to represent their opinions in the governing body/bodies. The apparent terminal conclusion from the executive boards handling of the opinions expressed on the charging scheme question, for the many not being heard in any clear terms at all, is to elect new representatives more accurately representing the membership. It is easy to foresee “cost reductions” being a quite popular agenda item for any future board candidate. And that will probably remain the case for a period of time longer than any individual board seat election time. Time will tell how it actually plays out. In any case, I will support a candidate who articulates ambitions to work towards meaningful cost reductions. Best regards, Martin

On 8. 5. 24 10:48, Martin Millnert via members-discuss wrote> In a representative democratic system the voters elect
representatives to represent their opinions in the governing body/bodies. The apparent terminal conclusion from the executive boards handling of the opinions expressed on the charging scheme question, for the many not being heard in any clear terms at all, is to elect new representatives more accurately representing the membership.
It is easy to foresee “cost reductions” being a quite popular agenda item for any future board candidate. And that will probably remain the case for a period of time longer than any individual board seat election time. Time will tell how it actually plays out. In any case, I will support a candidate who articulates ambitions to work towards meaningful cost reductions.
I've been quietly following this whole discussion about the budget and I don't understand how we (the members, GM) can approve the plan of activities, projects and actions for the RIPE NCC and at the next meeting we (the members, GM) cut down their budget. In normal business world, this doesn't work like this :) If you approve the activity plan - then you need to assure the budget for it. So the real discussion shouldn't be the budget and member fees, but the activity plan - the budget needs to follow that. :) Cheers, Jan

Hi Jan, this is not a result of the activity plan. That is a reaction of the members, because the EB offered three, but actually similar proposals with a 20% increase and they didnt consider the voices in the last years. the members made a reaction by votiong for a proposal like this. a LIR with more than 3% of the allocation organised by RIPE NCC pays same as a LIR who owns lower than %0,001 of the total resource of the RIPE NCC. So many of the voter voted for this because they find this and the desicion to propose sort of ilusion unfair. I followed also this discussion, and this discussion was about the charging scheme, and yes, there were the signs of the reaction of the members.. To ensure the budget on shoulders of the smal LIRs without offering any other charging options, is not fair! This wont bring a “stable future”. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 10.05.2024 um 17:59 schrieb Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>:
On 8. 5. 24 10:48, Martin Millnert via members-discuss wrote> In a representative democratic system the voters elect
representatives to represent their opinions in the governing body/bodies. The apparent terminal conclusion from the executive boards handling of the opinions expressed on the charging scheme question, for the many not being heard in any clear terms at all, is to elect new representatives more accurately representing the membership.
It is easy to foresee “cost reductions” being a quite popular agenda item for any future board candidate. And that will probably remain the case for a period of time longer than any individual board seat election time. Time will tell how it actually plays out. In any case, I will support a candidate who articulates ambitions to work towards meaningful cost reductions.
I've been quietly following this whole discussion about the budget and I don't understand how we (the members, GM) can approve the plan of activities, projects and actions for the RIPE NCC and at the next meeting we (the members, GM) cut down their budget.
In normal business world, this doesn't work like this :)
If you approve the activity plan - then you need to assure the budget for it.
So the real discussion shouldn't be the budget and member fees, but the activity plan - the budget needs to follow that. :)
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

On 10. 5. 24 19:01, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
a LIR with more than 3% of the allocation organised by RIPE NCC pays same as a LIR who owns lower than %0,001 of the total resource of the RIPE NCC.
I agree that this doesn't seem very fair, and that was also my question back in the days when we decided to abandon the categories and go for flat fee for everybody. So DT pays the same as my neighbour with a small ISP in his garage. The reasoning back then was something around "this is a club membership fee and usually the club membership is the same for everyone and when you are a member of a club - you can get the resources that you need." I'm not sure that we can get the categories based fees back as in whichever way we try to define them - there are more people voting at the GM that would have to pay more than the ones that would have to pay less - and the majority usually wins. Now - why the small LIRs don't cast their vote and bring the categories based membership back? That's maybe the question that you need to ask or maybe act on it. What I've seen here is just people repeating and whining about how unfair this is... ;) Cheers, Jan

Hi, thank you. I have things that i agree with you and things that i dont agree. This is a way to reach some of the members, EB and make a voice. Many of the members here shared their ideas tried to stay in touch with their community, NOGs etc.. In this discussion list and in other channels many member shared their ideas or alternatives. Last year may be only 10-15% of members have voted. Only for the proposal for the old scheme in 3-4 days 700 members has voted. I think this is a sign of the needed change. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 10.05.2024 um 23:10 schrieb Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>:
On 10. 5. 24 19:01, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
a LIR with more than 3% of the allocation organised by RIPE NCC pays same as a LIR who owns lower than %0,001 of the total resource of the RIPE NCC.
I agree that this doesn't seem very fair, and that was also my question back in the days when we decided to abandon the categories and go for flat fee for everybody. So DT pays the same as my neighbour with a small ISP in his garage.
The reasoning back then was something around "this is a club membership fee and usually the club membership is the same for everyone and when you are a member of a club - you can get the resources that you need."
I'm not sure that we can get the categories based fees back as in whichever way we try to define them - there are more people voting at the GM that would have to pay more than the ones that would have to pay less - and the majority usually wins.
Now - why the small LIRs don't cast their vote and bring the categories based membership back? That's maybe the question that you need to ask or maybe act on it. What I've seen here is just people repeating and whining about how unfair this is... ;)
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

On 11. 5. 24 00:45, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
Last year may be only 10-15% of members have voted.
Only for the proposal for the old scheme in 3-4 days 700 members has voted.
I think this is a sign of the needed change.
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :) Cheers, Jan

Hello, On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see. I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote. Regards, Clément Cavadore

Hi Clément, The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual. And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options. All the best, Fergal On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...

Fergal, Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted? If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options? Daniel~ On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote: > Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing > list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

Hi Daniel, In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass. The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes." https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-... All the best, Fergal On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Fergal,
Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted?
If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options?
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing listmembers-discuss@ripe.nethttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks. Clément Cavadore

Which i believe, there are at least 26 RIPE employee with LIR spaces in which they can vote and adopt it heh! On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:39 PM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks.
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40albahost.net
-- *Sinqerisht / Sincerely,* AlbaHost [image: Logo] <https://www.albahost.net/> Albanian Hosting SH.P.K. Besim Beka p.n. 50000 Gjakovë, Kosovë. NIPT/VAT ID: 811442657 T: +386900501502 E: info@albahost.net W*: *wWw.AlbaHost.Net <http://www.albahost.net/> [image: Facebook icon] <https://www.facebook.com/albanianhosting> [image: Twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/albahost> [image: Instagram icon] <https://www.instagram.com/albahost_vpn/> [image: Banner] Përmbajtja e këtij emaili është konfidenciale dhe ka për qëllim marrësin e specifikuar vetëm në mesazh. Ndalohet rreptësisht shpërndarja e ndonjë pjese të këtij mesazhi me ndonjë palë të tretë, pa pëlqimin me shkrim të dërguesit. Nëse e keni marrë këtë mesazh gabimisht, ju lutemi përgjigjuni këtij mesazhi dhe ndiqni me fshirjen e tij, në mënyrë që të sigurohemi që një gabim i tillë të mos ndodhë në të ardhmen. The content of this email is confidential and intended for the recipient specified in message only. It is strictly forbidden to share any part of this message with any third party, without a written consent of the sender. If you received this message by mistake, please reply to this message and follow with its deletion, so that we can ensure such a mistake does not occur in the future.

Yes. I can (almost) accept that for a national election (and that is debatable), but for a NGO/NPO, where the voting members are considered as experts in their field, it sounds a bit off. David
Le 14 mai 2024 à 13:38, Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> a écrit :
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks.
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/david.ponzone%40ipeva...

On 14 May 2024, at 13:38, Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks.
Come on, do we really need to ask the RIPE NCC to organize a session “Voting For Dummies”? You have three options during a vote: - Yes - No - I don’t care If there are: - 26 votes in favor - 24 votes against - 950 abstentions Then: - 26 people care and want the resolution to pass - 24 people care and don’t want the resolution to pass - 950 people say “I don’t care” And the resolution passes. It’s not rocket science. Alex

On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:52 +0200, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Come on, do we really need to ask the RIPE NCC to organize a session “Voting For Dummies”?
You have three options during a vote:
- Yes - No - I don’t care
Excuse me, but no, it's not a Yes/No/IDC option. It's not a rocket science that if you are offered the choice between: A- to jump in a burning volcano crater B- get off a plane without a parachute C- jump in the ocean with a tied up rock on your feets D- abstain you'd rather... abstain (hopefully for you). But you'd certainly not "do not care" about those options. Regards, Clément

Hi. Except there is NO vote option against in any form. It’s just 3 times slightly modified “yes” pretending we have choice and way to affect resolution.
On 14 May 2024, at 14:55, Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> wrote:
On 14 May 2024, at 13:38, Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
On Tue, 2024-05-14 at 13:33 +0200, Fergal Cunningham wrote: Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
best recipe on how to make an unwanted decision pass. Good game, folks.
Come on, do we really need to ask the RIPE NCC to organize a session “Voting For Dummies”?
You have three options during a vote:
- Yes - No - I don’t care
If there are:
- 26 votes in favor - 24 votes against - 950 abstentions
Then:
- 26 people care and want the resolution to pass - 24 people care and don’t want the resolution to pass - 950 people say “I don’t care”
And the resolution passes.
It’s not rocket science.
Alex _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mihail%40fedorov.net

Hi Fergal, On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:33 Fergal Cunningham <fergalc@ripe.net> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
Let’s go on with this hypothetical example and say that 16 voted for option one, 17 for option 2, 17 for option 3. Will any resolution still pass? Elvis
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Fergal,
Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted?
If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options?
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing listmembers-discuss@ripe.nethttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elvis%40v4escrow.net

Hi Elvis, Yes. The system works the same way whether there are 50 or 5,000 votes. In your example, no option has a majority after the first round. So option 1 is eliminated and the second preferences are redistributed to the other two options. Whichever of those two then has the majority is deemed to be the winner. Hope that helps. It's the exact same system as the one we always use for the EB elections. Fergal On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:43 PM Elvis Daniel Velea <elvis@v4escrow.net> wrote:
Hi Fergal,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:33 Fergal Cunningham <fergalc@ripe.net> wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
Let’s go on with this hypothetical example and say that 16 voted for option one, 17 for option 2, 17 for option 3.
Will any resolution still pass?
Elvis
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Fergal,
Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted?
If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options?
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing listmembers-discuss@ripe.nethttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elvis%40v4escrow.net

Hi Fergal, Thanks for that clarification, I can't help but feel like this "choice" was carefully crafted in how it has been presented to the membership base to ensure that regardless of what "choice" we make, the board is going to get what they want, which is to raise fee's and sustain an even higher budget. It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme. We've been "told" that such a motion cannot be made by the membership and "must" come from the EB, which is highly debatable. You now confirm that members, *regardless of their action* have no voice in the matter and *some* form of price change to the charging scheme will occur even if only a single member votes for it. Since we're on the topic of discussions, I noticed something that was ignored previously, and I cannot seem to find in the EB meeting minutes. Which board members voted FOR this charging scheme and which members abstained or voted against this charging scheme. Second question, how many members need to support a proposal to recall board members and force a new election? It seems that may be the only way we will actually see any progress on this matter is to fully replace the board of directors. Daniel~ On 5/14/24 6:33 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Fergal,
Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted?
If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options?
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote: > Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing > list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

++ for this one: *Second question, how many members need to support a proposal to recall board members and force a new election? It seems that may be the only way we will actually see any progress on this matter is to fully replace the board of directors.* On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:07 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Fergal,
Thanks for that clarification, I can't help but feel like this "choice" was carefully crafted in how it has been presented to the membership base to ensure that regardless of what "choice" we make, the board is going to get what they want, which is to raise fee's and sustain an even higher budget.
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
We've been "told" that such a motion cannot be made by the membership and "must" come from the EB, which is highly debatable.
You now confirm that members, *regardless of their action* have no voice in the matter and *some* form of price change to the charging scheme will occur even if only a single member votes for it.
Since we're on the topic of discussions, I noticed something that was ignored previously, and I cannot seem to find in the EB meeting minutes.
Which board members voted FOR this charging scheme and which members abstained or voted against this charging scheme.
Second question, how many members need to support a proposal to recall board members and force a new election? It seems that may be the only way we will actually see any progress on this matter is to fully replace the board of directors.
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:33 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Fergal,
Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted?
If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options?
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing listmembers-discuss@ripe.nethttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/info%40albahost.net

++ for this one:
Second question, how many members need to support a proposal to recall board members and force a new election? It seems that may be the only way we will actually see any progress on this matter is to fully replace the board of directors.
This is covered in the Articles of Association. https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-9-executive-board-a... You need to get the votes to call an EGM with the resolutions of dismissing the members of the board, and then achieve a two-thirds majority for those resolutions. Rob

Considering we had 700+ participants call for the amendment to not change the charging scheme, and only needed 2% of the member base, this seems relatively achievable. I've asked the opinion of the current individuals up for election to the EB their thoughts on the matter of this issue as well over on the candidate mailing list so I'll be curious to what they say. I did notice in the articles as well if the entire EB is dissolved then the management must elect a new interim EB so I really would like to get the opinions of each board member so we can know if this is a universal problem with each and every board member, or if this is simply spearheaded by a few people. It feels like presenting the membership with a vote that results in the same outcome, is not providing the membership with a genuine choice and feels very manipulative. I'm not an expert on Dutch law at all, but would this charging scheme even stand up to the scrutiny of the legal system there? Can it truly be considered a choice when each choice results in increased fee's and a larger bloated budget for RIPE? On 5/14/24 7:21 AM, Rob Evans wrote:
++ for this one:
Second question, how many members need to support a proposal to recall board members and force a new election? It seems that may be the only way we will actually see any progress on this matter is to fully replace the board of directors. This is covered in the Articles of Association.
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-9-executive-board-a...
You need to get the votes to call an EGM with the resolutions of dismissing the members of the board, and then achieve a two-thirds majority for those resolutions.
Rob

On Tue May 14, 2024 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
It feels like presenting the membership with a vote that results in the same outcome, is not providing the membership with a genuine choice and feels very manipulative. I'm not an expert on Dutch law at all, but would this charging scheme even stand up to the scrutiny of the legal system there? Can it truly be considered a choice when each choice results in increased fee's and a larger bloated budget for RIPE?
Yes, because you persist in thinking that this is a vote on what the budget should be. It's not. It's a vote on how the budget should be funded. The budget is set from the activity plan. The activity plan is already set. Want a lower budget (and thus lower membership fees) in the next cycle? Sure. Just persuade the membership that RIPE should drop things from the activity plan. Simon

Hi Simon, Thanks for your reply. I have seen the activity plan brought up before several times, but I've not seen anywhere that the membership has been asked to provide input on it at all, much less provide any vote for it. The membership clearly stated last year that they did not agree with the charging scheme change, and, from my perspective, during discussions stated that the budget was of serious concern and that RIPE should work to reduce the budget. It does not appear that concern was taken seriously, and if I recall somewhere in this mailing list I believe someone at RIPE stated that reducing services to reduce the budget was not on the table or something to that effect. The RIPE leadership and by extension the board simply does not appear in-tune with the voice of the members. Daniel~ On 5/14/24 7:37 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Tue May 14, 2024 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
It feels like presenting the membership with a vote that results in the same outcome, is not providing the membership with a genuine choice and feels very manipulative. I'm not an expert on Dutch law at all, but would this charging scheme even stand up to the scrutiny of the legal system there? Can it truly be considered a choice when each choice results in increased fee's and a larger bloated budget for RIPE? Yes, because you persist in thinking that this is a vote on what the budget should be. It's not. It's a vote on how the budget should be funded.
The budget is set from the activity plan. The activity plan is already set.
Want a lower budget (and thus lower membership fees) in the next cycle? Sure. Just persuade the membership that RIPE should drop things from the activity plan.
Simon

On 14 May 2024, at 15:09, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your reply.
I have seen the activity plan brought up before several times, but I've not seen anywhere that the membership has been asked to provide input on it at all, much less provide any vote for it.
The board asks for input every year: https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/draft-ripe-ncc-activity-plan-and-budg... If you would read an Activity Plan, which gets published as a RIPE document, you would find: "Each year, we publish a draft Activity Plan and Budget at least four weeks before the Autumn RIPE Meeting. At this meeting, time is allocated to discuss our services in the RIPE NCC Services Working Group and during the RIPE NCC General Meeting (GM). We also invite members to ask questions and discuss our plans on the RIPE NCC Membership Discussion mailing list (members-discuss@ripe.net) and the RIPE NCC Services WG mailing list (ncc-services-wg@ripe.net). The feedback received over this period is then incorporated into a final Activity Plan and Budget that is approved by our Executive Board and published in December." https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-786/ In fact, it’s very hard to miss the board’s call for input for anyone who’s even slightly interested in this stuff.
The membership clearly stated last year that they did not agree with the charging scheme change, and, from my perspective, during discussions stated that the budget was of serious concern and that RIPE should work to reduce the budget.
It does not appear that concern was taken seriously, and if I recall somewhere in this mailing list I believe someone at RIPE stated that reducing services to reduce the budget was not on the table or something to that effect. The RIPE leadership and by extension the board simply does not appear in-tune with the voice of the members
As the board expressed several times, the concern is being taken seriously. However, you can’t just change the charging scheme to reduce the RIPE NCC income without FIRST adjusting the budget and BEFORE THAT the activity plan. Which has also been clearly explained several times. So anyone who’s serious about changing any of this should move their focus from the Charging Scheme to the Activity Plan because ALL charging schemes that are put up for voting will ALWAYS cover the Activity Plan and the Budget that goes along with it. Cheers, Alex
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 7:37 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Tue May 14, 2024 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
It feels like presenting the membership with a vote that results in the same outcome, is not providing the membership with a genuine choice and feels very manipulative. I'm not an expert on Dutch law at all, but would this charging scheme even stand up to the scrutiny of the legal system there? Can it truly be considered a choice when each choice results in increased fee's and a larger bloated budget for RIPE? Yes, because you persist in thinking that this is a vote on what the budget should be. It's not. It's a vote on how the budget should be funded.
The budget is set from the activity plan. The activity plan is already set.
Want a lower budget (and thus lower membership fees) in the next cycle? Sure. Just persuade the membership that RIPE should drop things from the activity plan.
Simon
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716297101000000&usg=AOvVaw2O-GPZDPnFn1dQ9ePQ3LKT Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716297101000000&usg=AOvVaw21fEq2OLBttltMSFbpNdtj

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 03:28:03PM +0200, Alex Le Heux wrote:
[...]
However, you can???t just change the charging scheme to reduce the RIPE NCC income without FIRST adjusting the budget and BEFORE THAT the activity plan.
[...]
In November 2023 we voted for the budget and activity plan 2024. Nr. 6 of the Agenda of the May 2024 GM is the Charging Scheme for 2025 ! That means, we decide now, about the income of the next year and in the following November meeting we vote "what we want to buy with it". Not vice-versa . Andreas

Hi, On 14/05/2024 13:50, Andreas Schmieja wrote:
In November 2023 we voted for the budget and activity plan 2024.
Nr. 6 of the Agenda of the May 2024 GM is the Charging Scheme for 2025 !
That means, we decide now, about the income of the next year and in the following November meeting we vote "what we want to buy with it".
Not vice-versa .
No, the budget and activity plan are presented at the November meetings, but there is no vote. Best regards, Sebastien Brossier

And that might be real issue, the members may comment on activity plan, but it is left to EB discretion to which extent they implement community's feedback. So, the only way for members to strongly express their opinion is charging scheme voting, which is way too late. -----Original Message----- From: Sebastien <sebastien@brossier.org> To: members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> Date: Tuesday, 14 May 2024 10:29 PM CEST Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hi, On 14/05/2024 13:50, Andreas Schmieja wrote:
In November 2023 we voted for the budget and activity plan 2024.
Nr. 6 of the Agenda of the May 2024 GM is the Charging Scheme for 2025 !
That means, we decide now, about the income of the next year and in the following November meeting we vote "what we want to buy with it".
Not vice-versa .
No, the budget and activity plan are presented at the November meetings, but there is no vote. Best regards, Sebastien Brossier _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/adam.golebiowski%40ag...

Perhaps someone from the board can comment on how much and what kind of feedback on the Activity Plan they receive, if any? Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 14 May 2024, at 23:51, Adam <adam.golebiowski@agmk.net> wrote:
And that might be real issue, the members may comment on activity plan, but it is left to EB discretion to which extent they implement community's feedback. So, the only way for members to strongly express their opinion is charging scheme voting, which is way too late. From: Sebastien <sebastien@brossier.org> To: members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> Date: Tuesday, 14 May 2024 10:29 PM CEST Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Hi,
On 14/05/2024 13:50, Andreas Schmieja wrote:
In November 2023 we voted for the budget and activity plan 2024.
Nr. 6 of the Agenda of the May 2024 GM is the Charging Scheme for 2025 !
That means, we decide now, about the income of the next year and in the following November meeting we vote "what we want to buy with it".
Not vice-versa .
No, the budget and activity plan are presented at the November meetings, but there is no vote.
Best regards, Sebastien Brossier
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/adam.golebiowski%40ag... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716328890000000&usg=AOvVaw1MbxQEbtrSFt7_AIEjGn45 Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716328890000000&usg=AOvVaw1IPIkz5H7o1FoDjbJz1X6o

On 15 May 2024, at 12:06, Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> wrote:
Perhaps someone from the board can comment on how much and what kind of feedback on the Activity Plan they receive, if any?
They have commented here and elsewhere… They got no feedback at all. :( f

Am 14.05.24 um 15:50 schrieb Andreas Schmieja:
In November 2023 we voted for the budget and activity plan 2024.
Nope. Quoting https://www.ripe.net/membership/meetings/gm/meetings/november-2023/agenda/, the two resolutions to vote for were "Redistribution of the RIPE NCC Surplus" and "Amendments to the Articles of Association".
Nr. 6 of the Agenda of the May 2024 GM is the Charging Scheme for 2025 !
That means, we decide now, about the income of the next year and in the following November meeting we vote "what we want to buy with it".
Not unless something fundamentally changes; currently, the Activity Plan (and the corresponding Budget) is presented as draft to the membership at the GM in fall – input is welcome by the RIPE NCC Executive Board but usually doesn't happen much – and the EB some time later publishes the final version, that's as much influence the membership has right now on the Activity Plan and therefore the Budget. Especially with an EB that already stated to "believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes", stated that it wants to stick to it's current five-year-plan. But indeed it's interessting that we shall vote in spring 2024 on the Charging Scheme for 2025, covering for a not-yet-discussed Budget for 2025. Thus, on the GM on fall, I think members should put forward a voting under 11.1 of the AoA on the approval of 2024's Activity Plan and Budget. Furthermore, I suggest members should file for a voting under 15.5 c tohave the EB cut the Budget, and indirectly the activities, by 15% for 2025 and by 30% for 2026, based on 2024's Budget. Regards, -kai -- Kai Siering Senior System Engineer mail.de GmbH Münsterstraße 3 D-33330 Gütersloh Tel.: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 986 Fax: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 987 E-Mail: k.siering@team.mail.de Web: https://mail.de/ Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Fabian Bock Sitz der Gesellschaft Nordhastedt Handelsregister Pinneberg HRB 8007 PI Steuernummer 18 293 20020

Hi Daniel, Here is the mail from Hans Petter last year announcing the Draft Activity Plan. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2023-October/001679.htm... You can see he points to the cost savings made, and the fact we ran an Open House to get more feedback, and published several articles on the document. And we discussed this at the RIPE Meeting and General Meeting and asked for feedback repeatedly on other channels. The mail announcing the final version is here, and it shows the amendments made based on member feedback and the main source of cost savings we achieved: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2023-December/001692.ht... We do see the Activity Plan and Budget receives much less feedback than the Charging Scheme, which causes problems when we are asked to cut the budget but have not received much feedback on where those cuts should come from. We will make a bigger effort to get feedback on the plan this year and we will be hoping to see a good discussion around it in the Autumn. Best regards, Fergal On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:11 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your reply.
I have seen the activity plan brought up before several times, but I've not seen anywhere that the membership has been asked to provide input on it at all, much less provide any vote for it.
The membership clearly stated last year that they did not agree with the charging scheme change, and, from my perspective, during discussions stated that the budget was of serious concern and that RIPE should work to reduce the budget.
It does not appear that concern was taken seriously, and if I recall somewhere in this mailing list I believe someone at RIPE stated that reducing services to reduce the budget was not on the table or something to that effect. The RIPE leadership and by extension the board simply does not appear in-tune with the voice of the members.
Daniel~
On Tue May 14, 2024 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
It feels like presenting the membership with a vote that results in the same outcome, is not providing the membership with a genuine choice and feels very manipulative. I'm not an expert on Dutch law at all, but would this charging scheme even stand up to the scrutiny of the legal system
On 5/14/24 7:37 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote: there? Can
it truly be considered a choice when each choice results in increased fee's and a larger bloated budget for RIPE? Yes, because you persist in thinking that this is a vote on what the budget should be. It's not. It's a vote on how the budget should be funded.
The budget is set from the activity plan. The activity plan is already set.
Want a lower budget (and thus lower membership fees) in the next cycle? Sure. Just persuade the membership that RIPE should drop things from the activity plan.
Simon
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...

On 14/05/2024 17:57, Fergal Cunningham wrote: Rather than discuss the charging scheme, we need to discuss the activity plan and budget. The 2024 activity plan and budget are already set but we need to already discuss the activity plan and budget for 2025. In the same way the 2024 budget was reduced by 1.8MEuro, so too the 2025 budget should be reduced by a similar amount: https://www.ripe.net/documents/3082/RIPE_NCC_Activity_Plan_and_Budget_2024.p... The board should figure a way to poll the membership in regards to which activities need to be reduced. Regards, Hank
Hi Daniel,
Here is the mail from Hans Petter last year announcing the Draft Activity Plan.
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2023-October/001679.htm... <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2023-October/001679.html>
You can see he points to the cost savings made, and the fact we ran an Open House to get more feedback, and published several articles on the document. And we discussed this at the RIPE Meeting and General Meeting and asked for feedback repeatedly on other channels.
The mail announcing the final version is here, and it shows the amendments made based on member feedback and the main source of cost savings we achieved:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2023-December/001692.ht... <https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2023-December/001692.html>
We do see the Activity Plan and Budget receives much less feedback than the Charging Scheme, which causes problems when we are asked to cut the budget but have not received much feedback on where those cuts should come from. We will make a bigger effort to get feedback on the plan this year and we will be hoping to see a good discussion around it in the Autumn.
Best regards,
Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:11 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net <mailto:daniel@privatesystems.net>> wrote:
Hi Simon,
Thanks for your reply.
I have seen the activity plan brought up before several times, but I've not seen anywhere that the membership has been asked to provide input on it at all, much less provide any vote for it.
The membership clearly stated last year that they did not agree with the charging scheme change, and, from my perspective, during discussions stated that the budget was of serious concern and that RIPE should work to reduce the budget.
It does not appear that concern was taken seriously, and if I recall somewhere in this mailing list I believe someone at RIPE stated that reducing services to reduce the budget was not on the table or something to that effect. The RIPE leadership and by extension the board simply does not appear in-tune with the voice of the members.
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 7:37 AM, Simon Lockhart wrote: > On Tue May 14, 2024 at 07:27:57AM -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote: >> It feels like presenting the membership with a vote that results in the same >> outcome, is not providing the membership with a genuine choice and feels >> very manipulative. I'm not an expert on Dutch law at all, but would this >> charging scheme even stand up to the scrutiny of the legal system there? Can >> it truly be considered a choice when each choice results in increased fee's >> and a larger bloated budget for RIPE? > Yes, because you persist in thinking that this is a vote on what the budget > should be. It's not. It's a vote on how the budget should be funded. > > The budget is set from the activity plan. The activity plan is already set. > > Want a lower budget (and thus lower membership fees) in the next cycle? Sure. > Just persuade the membership that RIPE should drop things from the activity > plan. > > Simon
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net <mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40... <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40ripe.net>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/hank%40interall.co.il

Am 14.05.24 um 16:57 schrieb Fergal Cunningham:
We do see the Activity Plan and Budget receives much less feedback than the Charging Scheme, which causes problems when we are asked to cut the budget but have not received much feedback on where those cuts should come from. We will make a bigger effort to get feedback on the plan this year and we will be hoping to see a good discussion around it in the Autumn.
Frankly, I'd go with "cut the Budget by 15% for the next cycle, by 30% the one after, based on the 2024 Budget". It's obviously money that matters, so follow the "lawnmower principle" and apply the cuts across the board. It might be more difficult here and there (long-term contracts?), so maybe some budgets must suffer more ("IT Services"? "Community Building"? Why does the LIR portal alone costs 6.1% of each member's fee? Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root? Stop the travelling, all but one RIPE Meeting per year be virtual-only, the one im presence to take place somewhere in the Netherlands where it's cheapest for the NCC to run such an event). With 20k members, a relative cut across all positions is the most logical approach to me ... I'm still not amused this discussion taking place only now; shrinking membership == rising costs per member was being voiced for some years, even by the EB, yet the Budget wasn't reduced accordingly, neither was the membership offered options on where to cut the expenses (even if that meant services not being offered anymore). Am 16.05.24 um 07:53 schrieb Hank Nussbacher:
Rather than discuss the charging scheme, we need to discuss the activity plan and budget. The 2024 activity plan and budget are already set but we need to already discuss the activity plan and budget for 2025.
Yes, but this time, it should be _voted_ on (which means more work since _alternatives_ need to be presented; yes/no won't solve any issues). And the EB should receive a clear message from the members whether to reduce the money spend and if so, by which amount in what timeframe. Lessons learned from the upcoming GM ... Regards, -kai -- Kai Siering Senior System Engineer mail.de GmbH Münsterstraße 3 D-33330 Gütersloh Tel.: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 986 Fax: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 987 E-Mail: k.siering@team.mail.de Web: https://mail.de/ Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Fabian Bock Sitz der Gesellschaft Nordhastedt Handelsregister Pinneberg HRB 8007 PI Steuernummer 18 293 20020

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 05:18:15PM +0200, Kai Siering via members-discuss wrote:
Frankly, I'd go with "cut the Budget by 15% for the next cycle, by 30% the one after, based on the 2024 Budget". It's obviously money that matters, so follow the "lawnmower principle" and apply the cuts across the board. It might be more difficult here and there (long-term contracts?), so maybe some budgets must suffer more ("IT Services"? "Community Building"? Why does the LIR portal alone costs 6.1% of each member's fee? Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root? Stop the travelling, all but one RIPE Meeting per year be virtual-only, the one im presence to take place somewhere in the Netherlands where it's cheapest for the NCC to run such an event). With 20k members, a relative cut across all positions is the most logical approach to me ...
I'm still not amused this discussion taking place only now; shrinking membership == rising costs per member was being voiced for some years, even by the EB, yet the Budget wasn't reduced accordingly, neither was the membership offered options on where to cut the expenses (even if that meant services not being offered anymore).
So what will you do if we actually get to vote on this, and the majority of the voting members goes for "let's keep the RIPE meetings as they are, keep providing k.root, and we're fine with the budget"? Happily accept the result, or complain about the charging scheme again? Because, effectively, the EB *has* asked for guidance, and most people in the room said "yeah, fine, go ahead, see where you can cut costs, but do not discontinue any services" - not voted, I agree on that, but at least "listening, nodding, and not protesting". Which is, moneywise, quite a bit of "support", in the way AGMs go. The question on RIPE meeting format & sponsorship came up a few times in the past, and the room's feedback was "yes, we want to bring in new people to the community, so please go *out* to places, and *do* subsidize the meeting, so people can afford to come"... personally, I see a virtual RIPE meeting as waste of time. The point is "meet people, have good discussions, build a community" which just doesn't work properly in the virtual format - at least not for me. Maybe I'm just too old and AI will make sure we do not need personal contacts anymore... Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Out of curiosity. How was this feedback gathered? I dont recall (again i could be wrong, if so please link me to when/where the poll was) being asked on feedback regarding this. Is this just feedback from physical events ? regards On 5/16/24 5:25 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
The question on RIPE meeting format & sponsorship came up a few times in the past, and the room's feedback was "yes, we want to bring in new people to the community, so please go*out* to places, and*do* subsidize the meeting, so people can afford to come"... personally, I see a virtual RIPE meeting as waste of time. The point is "meet people, have good discussions, build a community" which just doesn't work properly in the virtual format - at least not for me. Maybe I'm just too old and AI will make sure we do not need personal contacts anymore...

Hi Sebastian-Wilhelm, I sent a mail on this to the list a couple of days ago. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2024-May/005669.html All the best, Fergal On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:36 PM Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf < ripe-members@sebastian-graf.at> wrote:
Out of curiosity.
How was this feedback gathered? I dont recall (again i could be wrong, if so please link me to when/where the poll was) being asked on feedback regarding this.
Is this just feedback from physical events ?
regards
On 5/16/24 5:25 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
The question on RIPE meeting format & sponsorship came up a few times in the past, and the room's feedback was "yes, we want to bring in new people to the community, so please go **out** to places, and **do** subsidize the meeting, so people can afford to come"... personally, I see a virtual RIPE meeting as waste of time. The point is "meet people, have good discussions, build a community" which just doesn't work properly in the virtual format - at least not for me. Maybe I'm just too old and AI will make sure we do not need personal contacts anymore...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...

This was phsical, right? Or was the open house electronic? regards On 5/16/24 5:43 PM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Sebastian-Wilhelm,
I sent a mail on this to the list a couple of days ago. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2024-May/005669.html
All the best, Fergal
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:36 PM Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf <ripe-members@sebastian-graf.at> wrote:
Out of curiosity.
How was this feedback gathered? I dont recall (again i could be wrong, if so please link me to when/where the poll was) being asked on feedback regarding this.
Is this just feedback from physical events ?
regards
On 5/16/24 5:25 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
The question on RIPE meeting format & sponsorship came up a few times in the past, and the room's feedback was "yes, we want to bring in new people to the community, so please go**out** to places, and**do** subsidize the meeting, so people can afford to come"... personally, I see a virtual RIPE meeting as waste of time. The point is "meet people, have good discussions, build a community" which just doesn't work properly in the virtual format - at least not for me. Maybe I'm just too old and AI will make sure we do not need personal contacts anymore...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...

Hi, The Open House was virtual. You can see the slides and recording here: https://www.ripe.net/membership/meetings/open-house/ripe-ncc-open-house-draf... So we solicited feedback here and on the main membership announce list, and also on the NCC Services WG list. And we pushed it on our news and social media channels. The Open House was just virtual. The discussions at the GM and RIPE Meeting are both physical and virtual. Hope that helps. Fergal On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:49 PM Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf < ripe-members@sebastian-graf.at> wrote:
This was phsical, right? Or was the open house electronic?
regards
On 5/16/24 5:43 PM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Sebastian-Wilhelm,
I sent a mail on this to the list a couple of days ago.
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/members-discuss/2024-May/005669.html
All the best, Fergal
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 5:36 PM Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf < ripe-members@sebastian-graf.at> wrote:
Out of curiosity.
How was this feedback gathered? I dont recall (again i could be wrong, if so please link me to when/where the poll was) being asked on feedback regarding this.
Is this just feedback from physical events ?
regards
On 5/16/24 5:25 PM, Gert Doering wrote:
The question on RIPE meeting format & sponsorship came up a few times in the past, and the room's feedback was "yes, we want to bring in new people to the community, so please go **out** to places, and **do** subsidize the meeting, so people can afford to come"... personally, I see a virtual RIPE meeting as waste of time. The point is "meet people, have good discussions, build a community" which just doesn't work properly in the virtual format - at least not for me. Maybe I'm just too old and AI will make sure we do not need personal contacts anymore...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...

Am 16.05.24 um 17:25 schrieb Gert Doering:
So what will you do if we actually get to vote on this, and the majority of the voting members goes for "let's keep the RIPE meetings as they are, keep providing k.root, and we're fine with the budget"? Happily accept the result, or complain about the charging scheme again?
If the membership voted for "the Budget is fine™", then the accusations about barking at the wrong tree next spring finally have substance. As of now, technically yes, but being only asked to vote on the Charging Scheme, not so much.
Because, effectively, the EB *has* asked for guidance, and most people in the room said "yeah, fine, go ahead, see where you can cut costs, but do not discontinue any services" - not voted, I agree on that, but at least "listening, nodding, and not protesting". Which is, moneywise, quite a bit of "support", in the way AGMs go.
Then why does actually get the approval of the Activity Plan and Budget is such a great thing? I for one didn't want to start such a discussion at the GM – IIRC last time I didn't even attend anymore, boooring –, it's much less stressy to communicate such stuff via email. But since we're not even supposed to be voting on that topic, to me it's just time spend fruitless. Or, to put it simple: No vote – no use. Regards, -kai -- Kai Siering Senior System Engineer mail.de GmbH Münsterstraße 3 D-33330 Gütersloh Tel.: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 986 Fax: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 987 E-Mail:k.siering@team.mail.de Web:https://mail.de/ Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Fabian Bock Sitz der Gesellschaft Nordhastedt Handelsregister Pinneberg HRB 8007 PI Steuernummer 18 293 20020

Hello Kai, I am following multiple RIPE (NCC) mailing list for 10+ years and your mail pulled the trigger on my side to actually raise my voice for the first time. On 16 May 2024, at 18:18, Kai Siering via members-discuss wrote:
Am 14.05.24 um 16:57 schrieb Fergal Cunningham:
We do see the Activity Plan and Budget receives much less feedback than the Charging Scheme, which causes problems when we are asked to cut the budget but have not received much feedback on where those cuts should come from. We will make a bigger effort to get feedback on the plan this year and we will be hoping to see a good discussion around it in the Autumn.
Frankly, I'd go with "cut the Budget by 15% for the next cycle, by 30% the one after, based on the 2024 Budget". It's obviously money that matters, so follow the "lawnmower principle" and apply the cuts across the board. It might be more difficult here and there (long-term contracts?), so maybe some budgets must suffer more ("IT Services"? "Community Building"? Why does the LIR portal alone costs 6.1% of each member's fee? Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root? Stop the travelling, all but one RIPE Meeting per year be virtual-only, the one im presence to take place somewhere in the Netherlands where it's cheapest for the NCC to run such an event). With 20k members, a relative cut across all positions is the most logical approach to me ...
Your arguments look to me all in favour of keeping the status quo. Or even making the internet a worse place as has already has become over the last years. Let me explain what I mean with that.
[…]so maybe some budgets must suffer more ("IT Services"? "Community Building"? Why does the LIR portal alone costs 6.1% of each member's fee?[...]
Well if we stop community building we actively stop inviting urgently needed people who are not part of this community (the internet) for maximum profit. And the current discussion shows that we need new non money driven ideas. Right now everybody and his mother are talking about "fair payment" but no one says "even if this will hurt me financially, it is fair and for the better of the community". My motivation to build networks and being part of communities around the internet(tm) is to provide a way of communication for others who solve actual problems of our society. Do I make a living out of that, sure but that was, is and will never be the reason why I am doing what I am doing. So community building is very important to get rid of people like you and me. We do not have the ideas to actually solve the problem of the internet-buy-out.
[…]Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root?[...]
Not in the short term. But stopping to run a community financed and driven root server is one more step towards a internet of the companies. And I am happy to see a part of my fee going into at least slow down the move into that direction.
[…]Stop the travelling, all but one RIPE Meeting per year be virtual-only, the one im presence to take place somewhere in the Netherlands where it's cheapest for the NCC to run such an event)[...]
I feel sorry for you, that you never had the experience sitting down with people having a dinner or a drink, talking about this and that and by accident you developed an idea which you would never had when you only had a meeting agenda for a time boxed 90 minute video call. I am financially not in the position of attending any RIPE meeting since I am self employed and just have the funds for attending. Still I strongly support those meetings. Because I had the mentioned experience. Oh also I support the travel of the RIPE NCC staff. I once organised a two day workshop at a former employer and it was worth every cent which RIPE NCC invested in those two days. So I am glad that I pay my part to support those workshops in presence.
[…]With 20k members, a relative cut across all positions is the most logical approach to me ...[...]
I totally agree. But in my opinion the cut should not be at a non profit organisation like RIPE NCC which is doing so much good for the free internet. Maybe we as the individuals and organisations of which the internet is build of should realise that if we don't stop to put profit first on our agenda will actually destroy the internet and therefore in the end also the basis of our whole business. Call me naive but THIS is our real problem. And all emails I read over the last years where in the direction of something like "I don't wanna pay for the community, and if I have to we need to agree on a model that results in me paying the least amount." Sure companies are financing the party and I understand that they want to make some profit. But ROI and "survival of the fittest" are no good judgment points if we talk about the internet as a free communication tool. For me being part of such an invaluable asset like a free and affordable internet for everyone comes with a responsibility. The responsibility to put my personal interests not at the first place. This includes paying for something which is with no direct benefit to me or my business. And if I am not able to do that, that is fine, but then just step down and leave the party.
I'm still not amused this discussion taking place only now; shrinking membership == rising costs per member was being voiced for some years, even by the EB, yet the Budget wasn't reduced accordingly, neither was the membership offered options on where to cut the expenses (even if that meant services not being offered anymore).
It is the same in every community. Nobody says something as long as his personal interests aren't on the line. Been there done that for ages.
Am 16.05.24 um 07:53 schrieb Hank Nussbacher:
Rather than discuss the charging scheme, we need to discuss the activity plan and budget. The 2024 activity plan and budget are already set but we need to already discuss the activity plan and budget for 2025.
Yes, but this time, it should be _voted_ on (which means more work since _alternatives_ need to be presented; yes/no won't solve any issues). And the EB should receive a clear message from the members whether to reduce the money spend and if so, by which amount in what timeframe. Lessons learned from the upcoming GM ...
Are you actually willing to invest the time and money needed to develop the alternatives you mentioned? Without payment. Out of your own pocket? To be honest mails like yours make me wanna find a solution to become more invested into RIPE (NCC) just to avoid that the mindset which I read from your mail get in control. Because I have the opinion that financial driven people should not have any power of something which can't be rebuild with money after they destroyed it. Last but not least: I don't know you, so non of the above is directed to you personally. It is just a coincident the your mail pulled the trigger on my side, could have been everybody else. So if you feel offended, I am sorry, that is not my intention. It is just, that I had to speak up. Regards — arl

On 16. 5. 24 19:12, Alexander Leefmann wrote:> To be honest mails like yours make me wanna find a solution to become
more invested into RIPE (NCC) just to avoid that the mindset which I read from your mail get in control. Because I have the opinion that financial driven people should not have any power of something which can't be rebuild with money after they destroyed it.
^^^^^^^^^^^ That! Cheers, Jan

Thanks for these words and I could not agree more! Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> im Auftrag von Alexander Leefmann <alex@nycro.de> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2024 um 19:14 An: Kai Siering <k.siering@team.mail.de> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] 2024/2025 Activity plan and budget Hello Kai, I am following multiple RIPE (NCC) mailing list for 10+ years and your mail pulled the trigger on my side to actually raise my voice for the first time. On 16 May 2024, at 18:18, Kai Siering via members-discuss wrote:
Am 14.05.24 um 16:57 schrieb Fergal Cunningham:
We do see the Activity Plan and Budget receives much less feedback than the Charging Scheme, which causes problems when we are asked to cut the budget but have not received much feedback on where those cuts should come from. We will make a bigger effort to get feedback on the plan this year and we will be hoping to see a good discussion around it in the Autumn.
Frankly, I'd go with "cut the Budget by 15% for the next cycle, by 30% the one after, based on the 2024 Budget". It's obviously money that matters, so follow the "lawnmower principle" and apply the cuts across the board. It might be more difficult here and there (long-term contracts?), so maybe some budgets must suffer more ("IT Services"? "Community Building"? Why does the LIR portal alone costs 6.1% of each member's fee? Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root? Stop the travelling, all but one RIPE Meeting per year be virtual-only, the one im presence to take place somewhere in the Netherlands where it's cheapest for the NCC to run such an event). With 20k members, a relative cut across all positions is the most logical approach to me ...
Your arguments look to me all in favour of keeping the status quo. Or even making the internet a worse place as has already has become over the last years. Let me explain what I mean with that.
[…]so maybe some budgets must suffer more ("IT Services"? "Community Building"? Why does the LIR portal alone costs 6.1% of each member's fee?[...]
Well if we stop community building we actively stop inviting urgently needed people who are not part of this community (the internet) for maximum profit. And the current discussion shows that we need new non money driven ideas. Right now everybody and his mother are talking about "fair payment" but no one says "even if this will hurt me financially, it is fair and for the better of the community". My motivation to build networks and being part of communities around the internet(tm) is to provide a way of communication for others who solve actual problems of our society. Do I make a living out of that, sure but that was, is and will never be the reason why I am doing what I am doing. So community building is very important to get rid of people like you and me. We do not have the ideas to actually solve the problem of the internet-buy-out.
[…]Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root?[...]
Not in the short term. But stopping to run a community financed and driven root server is one more step towards a internet of the companies. And I am happy to see a part of my fee going into at least slow down the move into that direction.
[…]Stop the travelling, all but one RIPE Meeting per year be virtual-only, the one im presence to take place somewhere in the Netherlands where it's cheapest for the NCC to run such an event)[...]
I feel sorry for you, that you never had the experience sitting down with people having a dinner or a drink, talking about this and that and by accident you developed an idea which you would never had when you only had a meeting agenda for a time boxed 90 minute video call. I am financially not in the position of attending any RIPE meeting since I am self employed and just have the funds for attending. Still I strongly support those meetings. Because I had the mentioned experience. Oh also I support the travel of the RIPE NCC staff. I once organised a two day workshop at a former employer and it was worth every cent which RIPE NCC invested in those two days. So I am glad that I pay my part to support those workshops in presence.
[…]With 20k members, a relative cut across all positions is the most logical approach to me ...[...]
I totally agree. But in my opinion the cut should not be at a non profit organisation like RIPE NCC which is doing so much good for the free internet. Maybe we as the individuals and organisations of which the internet is build of should realise that if we don't stop to put profit first on our agenda will actually destroy the internet and therefore in the end also the basis of our whole business. Call me naive but THIS is our real problem. And all emails I read over the last years where in the direction of something like "I don't wanna pay for the community, and if I have to we need to agree on a model that results in me paying the least amount." Sure companies are financing the party and I understand that they want to make some profit. But ROI and "survival of the fittest" are no good judgment points if we talk about the internet as a free communication tool. For me being part of such an invaluable asset like a free and affordable internet for everyone comes with a responsibility. The responsibility to put my personal interests not at the first place. This includes paying for something which is with no direct benefit to me or my business. And if I am not able to do that, that is fine, but then just step down and leave the party.
I'm still not amused this discussion taking place only now; shrinking membership == rising costs per member was being voiced for some years, even by the EB, yet the Budget wasn't reduced accordingly, neither was the membership offered options on where to cut the expenses (even if that meant services not being offered anymore).
It is the same in every community. Nobody says something as long as his personal interests aren't on the line. Been there done that for ages.
Am 16.05.24 um 07:53 schrieb Hank Nussbacher:
Rather than discuss the charging scheme, we need to discuss the activity plan and budget. The 2024 activity plan and budget are already set but we need to already discuss the activity plan and budget for 2025.
Yes, but this time, it should be _voted_ on (which means more work since _alternatives_ need to be presented; yes/no won't solve any issues). And the EB should receive a clear message from the members whether to reduce the money spend and if so, by which amount in what timeframe. Lessons learned from the upcoming GM ...
Are you actually willing to invest the time and money needed to develop the alternatives you mentioned? Without payment. Out of your own pocket? To be honest mails like yours make me wanna find a solution to become more invested into RIPE (NCC) just to avoid that the mindset which I read from your mail get in control. Because I have the opinion that financial driven people should not have any power of something which can't be rebuild with money after they destroyed it. Last but not least: I don't know you, so non of the above is directed to you personally. It is just a coincident the your mail pulled the trigger on my side, could have been everybody else. So if you feel offended, I am sorry, that is not my intention. It is just, that I had to speak up. Regards — arl _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C049a56289c524b989ded08dc75cba9d7%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514764786047464%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=oP97zudhFNYKoem5N8Zj7uG2tZ2%2Fhw7zcGm8NNOXN7g%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsebastian-becker%2540telekom.de&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C049a56289c524b989ded08dc75cba9d7%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514764786059297%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=hspTSV25BXAvG4PnVO1CA1%2FrFoZYp64TIV8OsVSLLnA%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sebastian-becker%40telekom.de>

HI, am 16.05.24 um 19:12 schrieb Alexander Leefmann:
Your arguments look to me all in favour of keeping the status quo.
Then I must have made a mistake; with respect to the funding of the RIPE NCC, I'd certainly would like to see changes.
Well if we stop community building we actively stop inviting urgently needed people who are not part of this community (the internet) for maximum profit. And the current discussion shows that we need new non money driven ideas. Right now everybody and his mother are talking about "fair payment" but no one says "even if this will hurt me financially, it is fair and for the better of the community".
There's no "fair" payment, and as was mentioned earlier, one reason to reject last year's category-based model were the suggested categories themselves. IMHO: IF you want to start to invoice based on resources, consider ALL resources — or none at all. As for community-building, you think there's no single EUR that can be spared to be spent? I cannot believe that. But the main point still is: with a shrinking membership, the budget mustn't keep rising (especially above inflation). Yet there is no effective move by the EB since one year ago to address this. This year's discussion really took the wrong turn some time ago; but there is, I think for the first time in years, a membership-supported agenda topic. Made useless by the AoA, but one lives and learns.
[…]Will the Internet stop working if RIPE NCC stops providing K-root?[...]
Not in the short term. But stopping to run a community financed and driven root server is one more step towards a internet of the companies. And I am happy to see a part of my fee going into at least slow down the move into that direction.
Fine by me, but shouldn't have the whole membership get a say in this? And a vote – here: about the Activity Plan (& corresponding Budget) – is how members are becoming involved into the decision-making process in a membership association.
Sure companies are financing the party and I understand that they want to make some profit. But ROI and "survival of the fittest" are no good judgment points if we talk about the internet as a free communication tool. As has been mentioned before, if +500 EUR/year breaks your business plan, maybe being a LIR is not such a wise move. (And regarding some non-profit associations that became LIRs as well, especially Freifunk ones, I do hope they'll get that financed somehow. It's roughly six months until the new charging regime hits, fortunately.) For me being part of such an invaluable asset like a free and affordable internet for everyone comes with a responsibility. The responsibility to put my personal interests not at the first place. This includes paying for something which is with no direct benefit to me or my business. And if I am not able to do that, that is fine, but then just step down and leave the party. I see your point; but times and memberships are changing.
Yes, but this time, it should be _voted_ on (which means more work since _alternatives_ need to be presented; yes/no won't solve any issues). And the EB should receive a clear message from the members whether to reduce the money spend and if so, by which amount in what timeframe. Lessons learned from the upcoming GM ...
Are you actually willing to invest the time and money needed to develop the alternatives you mentioned? Without payment. Out of your own pocket?
Actually no. I would expect the "we are listening" EB to have multiple Activity Plans, with different reductions and hence lower Budgets, presented at the GM and to be voted on by the membership.
Because I have the opinion that financial driven people should not have any power of something which can't be rebuild with money after they destroyed it.
I totally feel you.
Last but not least: I don't know you
That became obvious rather early in your mail ;) Nonetheless, I think the whole process of financing RIPE NCC needs to be redone. Being only asked how to distribute the budgeted amount, without being asked (in a vote) in which direction the Activity Plan (& Budget) should develop is just wrong. IMHO, YMMV. Regards, -kai -- Kai Siering Senior System Engineer mail.de GmbH Münsterstraße 3 D-33330 Gütersloh Tel.: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 986 Fax: +49 (0) 5241 / 74 34 987 E-Mail:k.siering@team.mail.de Web:https://mail.de/ Geschäftsführender Gesellschafter: Fabian Bock Sitz der Gesellschaft Nordhastedt Handelsregister Pinneberg HRB 8007 PI Steuernummer 18 293 20020

That became obvious rather early in your mail ;) Nonetheless, I think the whole process of financing RIPE NCC needs to be redone. Being only asked how to distribute the budgeted amount, without being asked (in a vote) in which direction the Activity Plan (& Budget) should develop is just wrong. IMHO, YMMV.
You were asked. Numerous times. All of you. You never said anything.

Well, some have asked or said something every now and then, sometimes even providing [subjectively] constructive input in the past. There have brief discussions w.r.t. what could be reduced or changed in either the budget or in activities at least: * Prior to 2023 AGM (a year ago), * When the 2024 draft activity plan was published (last fall), * Now, prior to the 2024 AGM Won't go summarizing the whys or whynots. You can find the threads in the archives. But yes, other than that you're entirely correct. :) While the volume of the list has grown significantly in the last few days, I believe it is better. I mean, better than when this list was moderated, and discussions weren't possible due to approval latency. So, some positive feedback right here. I would also take the opportunity to note that when the draft plan for the following year is published it is probably too late to expect change anything beyond a word here or there. Realistically only small changes can happen along with some kind of juggling as was seen with the slight reduction in operating budget for this fiscal year. This is good for continuity of the organization as well as its goals but of course annoying for those who have called for larger changes, whatever they might be. The implication is that feedback can be given but not necessarily lead to anything meaningful. Maybe some people do not understand this. If one wanted or needed to do larger changes targeting the following fiscal year, they would really have to be agreed and decided on already in the spring. This should be obvious to anyone who has soft budgeted anything for a ramp up or a ramp down. Now that the proposed budget that will pass includes last year's increase, which didn't happen, it is like going one step forward, two steps back. I would observe that if quite many people, representing the membership, are seemingly unhappy there is probably an underlying reason for it. Anecdotally it is true that one can't make everyone happy, ever. But looking at what has been written here now and, in the past, as well as at the short proposal on the agenda getting 700+ votes in support... well people do not seem to get/feel/perceive the implied value of everything RIPE provides or does. On the other hand, there are people who to talk about the community feeling and the wonderful meetings and all of that and reminisce of the past when everybody knew each other. I would observe here that many people cannot get travel permission to spend a week at a meeting. If they do, they need to show relevance and value to their manager. Yes, I know a survey was done and having looked at the survey results in detail have this question. If everything is so peachy and appreciated, why are customers unhappy? Around 1/4 of the budget is annually spent on what can be termed as marketing or as the organization labels it on community engagement. If people do not understand the benefits, well, something is off. :) It would probably be in the organization's best interest to show better the true value of the services they provide. One-liners, slogans, and blog posts do not seem to be enough. One cannot force your customers to change. To stay relevant for its customers the organization must accept that change is inevitable. Sorry, not sorry. Kaj Sent from my iPhone ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> Sent: Friday, May 17, 2024 11:04 AM To: Kai Siering <k.siering@team.mail.de> Cc: RIPE member discuss list <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] 2024/2025 Activity plan and budget
That became obvious rather early in your mail ;) Nonetheless, I think the whole process of financing RIPE NCC needs to be redone. Being only asked how to distribute the budgeted amount, without being asked (in a vote) in which direction the Activity Plan (& Budget) should develop is just wrong. IMHO, YMMV.
You were asked. Numerous times. All of you. You never said anything. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7C%7Ce5146a3f0939426d31df08dc7647e854%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638515298449923651%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=dao%2Fb%2BdyRZlpieY79DmD0bqN%2FvfyFNES8k%2B2XN3A%2FCg%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fkajtzu%2540basen.net&data=05%7C02%7C%7Ce5146a3f0939426d31df08dc7647e854%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638515298449935436%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6NQtBZtxScScD7971thHN%2BroOjuohZ4x9o%2B6zXVSrYs%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/kajtzu%40basen.net>

Hi Alex and all, For me it's a more complex subject. It's pretty easy to say, "You didn't say anything last year". It's also a clear view the community starts to break in two groups (pro and cons board plans). Even if I reply to the ripe survey "ripe does too many things and I don't feel ok to support some of them", people discover the cost of the new plan with that price change. I think the issue there is board / ripe doesn't provide a clear view of the budget requirement and how it translates to the yearly recurring fee for members. (Members are not financial, they are often tech) For the same price, yes, activity plan got validated. But for 30% (not the exact number) more, people start to look a bit more and understand they miss something. So, I think now people want a clear view of "how ripe can reduce the yearly per member bill by reducing / stopping activities they don't use / want to support". At the end, we are where we are now, and RIPE have to work differently. Things never be the same anymore and current board already know them. Be able to save money at the ripe ncc while making it stable become a next major reason to get elected to the board. (and we already have two candidates to propose with that mindset ;)) What append now change the rule for sure, and I hope the current management understand that and review their plan because it's time. Members now want more transparency in management, and more cost-saving measure. Now and not in 3 years. Best regards, Sarah Le 17-05-24 à 10:03, Alex Le Heux a écrit :
That became obvious rather early in your mail ;) Nonetheless, I think the whole process of financing RIPE NCC needs to be redone. Being only asked how to distribute the budgeted amount, without being asked (in a vote) in which direction the Activity Plan (& Budget) should develop is just wrong. IMHO, YMMV. You were asked. Numerous times. All of you.
You never said anything.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ml%40servperso.com

On 14. May 2024, at 13:47, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
No it is not a large potion. There are roughly 20000 members, you’re talking about 3.5%. I know it is in vogue right now to just demand things, reality, law and facts be damned. Still: The RIPE NCC needs the budget to keep operating. You can’t just suddenly pull funding because you feel like it. If you want a change (I don’t), go through the available options, the board members explained multiple times what these are and that they’re listening to your complaints. Maintaining the old charging scheme is not one of the available options. So it would be nice if people would accept the reality of the situation instead of repeating the same points ad nauseam. Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you. Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

"If you want a change (I don’t), go through the available options,
Sebastian, Thanks for your reply, I appreciate everyone who comments. To your point > "The RIPE NCC needs the budget to keep operating" No one disagrees that RIPE doesn't need a budget, but for two years now we have been telling RIPE to reduce it's budget, yet they continue to hire employees, and propose an increased budget every year. the board members explained multiple times what these are and that they’re listening to your complaints." We did, the 'resolution' was added to be voted upon but it will carry no weight.
"Maintaining the old charging scheme is not one of the available options"
Why? What is so difficult that could not be achieved over the last 2 years to reduce the budget to maintain the existing charging scheme. As a private company if you don't have the money (sales) to cover expenses you cut your budget. Sure you can raise prices on your consumers, and some companies do so, but smart companies know that it's a balancing act, and I've seen no visible signs of RIPE taking budget cuts seriously, so why should we be forced to pay more for their fiscal irresponsibility. They created this issue with the rush to register more LIR's just to get the last few block assignments, now the cash cow is gone and they got use to an increased budget. On 5/14/24 7:26 AM, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
On 14. May 2024, at 13:47, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
No it is not a large potion. There are roughly 20000 members, you’re talking about 3.5%. I know it is in vogue right now to just demand things, reality, law and facts be damned. Still:
The RIPE NCC needs the budget to keep operating. You can’t just suddenly pull funding because you feel like it. If you want a change (I don’t), go through the available options, the board members explained multiple times what these are and that they’re listening to your complaints. Maintaining the old charging scheme is not one of the available options. So it would be nice if people would accept the reality of the situation instead of repeating the same points ad nauseam.
Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you.
Regards
Sebastian
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

On 14. 5. 24 14:33, Daniel Pearson wrote:
Why? What is so difficult that could not be achieved over the last 2 years to reduce the budget to maintain the existing charging scheme. As a private company if you don't have the money (sales) to cover expenses you cut your budget. Sure you can raise prices on your consumers, and some companies do so, but smart companies know that it's a balancing act, and I've seen no visible signs of RIPE taking budget cuts seriously,
I've certainly seen signs of RIPE NCC taking the budget cuts... Maybe we'll see more budget savings at the RIPE88 meeting in Krakow, and I bet that people would complain if RIPE NCC would start saving on the RIPE meeting food, drinks and logistics ;) #bringyourownsandwichandwater On the other hand, the increased budget is - again - not an increased budget, but just a sync with the inflation (now they need to sync two years of the inflation due to previous GM resolution...). And as I already pointed out (and Simon also), if you want to decrease the budget - you need to shave off the activity plan. How you do that? Well -> GM :) Cheers, Jan

On 14. May 2024, at 14:33, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote: To your point > "The RIPE NCC needs the budget to keep operating"
No one disagrees that RIPE doesn't need a budget, but for two years now we have been telling RIPE to reduce it's budget, yet they continue to hire employees, and propose an increased budget every year.
They’re not increasing the budget, they’re keeping it in sync with the high inflation and the difficult economic environment. Also, a decision to start cutting costs was already made after the GM last year, but this doesn’t seem to have registered with many people complaining here. The EB already noted last year that the charging scheme should be increased to keep the financial situation stable. That was not what the membership wanted. This year it was no option to keep the charging scheme which I think shouldn’t have surprised anyone that was listening to the reports last year.
"If you want a change (I don’t), go through the available options, the board members explained multiple times what these are and that they’re listening to your complaints."
We did, the 'resolution' was added to be voted upon but it will carry no weight.
Because the option is to change the Activity Plan, not the funding for the Activity Plan. That the member proposal to keep the current charging scheme was just a performative thing and nothing that could change the available voting options was known *before* the proposal was created. Still it was created and still people complain that this fact remains a fact even after the proposal was created and reached the required support. Also the proposal had no input at all on how to achieve the goal of the proposal. It was and still is not a feasible proposal at all.
Why? What is so difficult that could not be achieved over the last 2 years to reduce the budget to maintain the existing charging scheme. As a private company if you don't have the money (sales) to cover expenses you cut your budget. Sure you can raise prices on your consumers, and some companies do so, but smart companies know that it's a balancing act, and I've seen no visible signs of RIPE taking budget cuts seriously, so why should we be forced to pay more for their fiscal irresponsibility. They created this issue with the rush to register more LIR's just to get the last few block assignments, now the cash cow is gone and they got use to an increased budget.
Almost all companies increased prices over the last years due to inflation and the economic climate. I’m not sure why people expect the RIPE NCC to just ignore that. The rush of new LIRs created a lot of problems for the RIPE NCC, not at least because many people tried to cheat the system and make profit off of it. The RIPE NCC needed to increase their expenditures just to deal with all the work that created. Don’t blame the RIPE NCC for these shady business people. We’re still seeing the effects of that and will continue to do so over the coming years as more and more LIRs get closed. I would suggest the membership to work with the RIPE NCC and the EB to find out where cost cutting is effective and wanted. As I already stated, I still see a lot of value for the money we pay as members. The RIPE NCC is not a for-profit company. It is there for its members, for the RIPE community and the worldwide community that makes the Internet what it is. If people are just here to get or sell their IP space they might not see what a difference that makes. Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

Hi, do you know, how many members took part to the votes? If you compare to the participation generally, it is a big part. And of course it is a reaction of the members, many members. And the Sponsoring LIR is not a option. If you followed the complete discussion, there are reasonable critic of many members.. In anyway, if the small resource holder, whereas they are about more than 60% of actual members, make consolidation or move to other options, the problem will again occur for remaining members and the board will try to ensure the budget... So we will have discussion again. And we don’t have this discussion in this year only. For years there is no solution for this problem and the 700 people showed their reaction in different contexts. "Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you." By the way, this is not your decision I think.. This is not a private family company... If I were someone who owns for example /15 subnet, of course I would prefer to have the offered proposals because the others with only /24 or /23 subnet pay for my resources also... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Sebastian Wiesinger Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 14:27 An: members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 14. May 2024, at 13:47, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
No it is not a large potion. There are roughly 20000 members, you’re talking about 3.5%. I know it is in vogue right now to just demand things, reality, law and facts be damned. Still: The RIPE NCC needs the budget to keep operating. You can’t just suddenly pull funding because you feel like it. If you want a change (I don’t), go through the available options, the board members explained multiple times what these are and that they’re listening to your complaints. Maintaining the old charging scheme is not one of the available options. So it would be nice if people would accept the reality of the situation instead of repeating the same points ad nauseam. Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you. Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space! And of course, those members with alot of resources feels comfortable with it! I would like to see those confortability, if there would be an policy/adoption to raise the membership fees to members like Sebastian by 5x more, and let see if he is comfortable with it! On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:45 PM <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote:
Hi,
do you know, how many members took part to the votes? If you compare to the participation generally, it is a big part. And of course it is a reaction of the members, many members.
And the Sponsoring LIR is not a option.
If you followed the complete discussion, there are reasonable critic of many members..
In anyway, if the small resource holder, whereas they are about more than 60% of actual members, make consolidation or move to other options, the problem will again occur for remaining members and the board will try to ensure the budget...
So we will have discussion again. And we don’t have this discussion in this year only. For years there is no solution for this problem and the 700 people showed their reaction in different contexts.
"Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you." By the way, this is not your decision I think.. This is not a private family company...
If I were someone who owns for example /15 subnet, of course I would prefer to have the offered proposals because the others with only /24 or /23 subnet pay for my resources also...
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS
Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland
Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de info@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Sebastian Wiesinger Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 14:27 An: members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 14. May 2024, at 13:47, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
No it is not a large potion. There are roughly 20000 members, you’re talking about 3.5%. I know it is in vogue right now to just demand things, reality, law and facts be damned. Still:
The RIPE NCC needs the budget to keep operating. You can’t just suddenly pull funding because you feel like it. If you want a change (I don’t), go through the available options, the board members explained multiple times what these are and that they’re listening to your complaints. Maintaining the old charging scheme is not one of the available options. So it would be nice if people would accept the reality of the situation instead of repeating the same points ad nauseam.
Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you.
Regards
Sebastian
-- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration
noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland
Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de
noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

On 14. 5. 24 14:51, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space!
Careful what you wish for... as then the big members would require many more votes, because they pay more. Would you be happy with 1 vote and big LIR having 1000 votes? Cheers, Jan

If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! On 14.05.2024 12:59, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
On 14. 5. 24 14:51, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space!
Careful what you wish for... as then the big members would require many more votes, because they pay more. Would you be happy with 1 vote and big LIR having 1000 votes?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor....

But it is not a tax it is membership fee. The difference should be obvious. ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED <admin@roskomnadzor.io> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 4:07:38 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! On 14.05.2024 12:59, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
On 14. 5. 24 14:51, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space!
Careful what you wish for... as then the big members would require many more votes, because they pay more. Would you be happy with 1 vote and big LIR having 1000 votes?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cd1498566a96d42a4035008dc7416d2ff%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512888579810354%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=%2FM7TTgOui0zw8gB8A5zJwHTSen39qRus%2BUDCzHimOx8%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fadmin%2540roskomnadzor.io&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cd1498566a96d42a4035008dc7416d2ff%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512888579819558%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wyaFgk2uF0%2BVnCAk4ysOQnOm0henvTErM1dcQ7MrH54%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor.io>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cd1498566a96d42a4035008dc7416d2ff%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512888579824314%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xMfnoDTXEulw%2FtH5cqxpzunozMNolNER%2FFN%2FDETOOd0%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%2540kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cd1498566a96d42a4035008dc7416d2ff%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512888579828888%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=F2rzNb0NhNzgbvsB%2FfxaZT0QUD1fGO%2FbR%2FyK6IGpF60%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.net>

On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan

If you pay taxes MORE - its doesnt give you additional votes! RIPE is Association - you cant have "shares". Payment per resources mean - EVERY pay SAME amount. Every member will be pay SAME AMOUNT PER RESOURCES! i.e. 10 EUR/YEAR per 256 IPv4. If you dont want to pay more? -> return resources to RIPE! If you have large scale resources doesnt mean about you must have more votes! On 14.05.2024 15:16, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor....

So some of you want “bigger” members to pay more, others are demanding that all members be “equal” It’s been explained multiple times by multiple people why the charging scheme is currently the way it is (TLDR members voted to do it this way) It’s also been explained multiple times by multiple people that if the membership don’t want activities they need to tell the NCC / Board. Apparently even though the Board has solicited feedback they haven’t got much. So we’re now in some kind of circle of hell where a bunch of vocal members keep asking for something that they’re never going to get, due to the method they’ve chosen to ask for it. While the rest of us have our inboxes flooded with more and more futile emails from the subset of members who aren’t listening to those who have explained how the system actually works. Fortunately the RIPE meeting will take place in a few days time and we’ll either all be able to move on with our lives or remove ourselves from this mailing list -- Mr Michele Neylon Blacknight Solutions Hosting, Colocation & Domains https://www.blacknight.com/ https://blacknight.blog/ Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072 Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090 Personal blog: https://michele.blog/ Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/ ------------------------------- Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845 I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours. From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED <admin@roskomnadzor.io> Date: Tuesday, 14 May 2024 at 16:29 To: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>, members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources. If you pay taxes MORE - its doesnt give you additional votes! RIPE is Association - you cant have "shares". Payment per resources mean - EVERY pay SAME amount. Every member will be pay SAME AMOUNT PER RESOURCES! i.e. 10 EUR/YEAR per 256 IPv4. If you dont want to pay more? -> return resources to RIPE! If you have large scale resources doesnt mean about you must have more votes! On 14.05.2024 15:16, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor....
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/michele%40blacknight....

Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065897013%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ji3hoK%2BsY6ipzoX83JOBZ%2Fg2KIdXOqBIIuBfX4Z4byA%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065905971%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZVxdoVlcIywrbbDRH1xIG9rAsysyXni5VdVPhx2LcdI%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065910614%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6o1OYa5CeVb9k45LVOlNEvC9WAANwxn3O%2FyHQCg%2BulM%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065915193%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k02jqDwJgBAoYeKOIRWYf8qqK4jmfB140K%2FfSSsDHAE%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/evgeniy.brodskiy%40kyivstar.net>

It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065897013%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ji3hoK%2BsY6ipzoX83JOBZ%2Fg2KIdXOqBIIuBfX4Z4byA%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065905971%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZVxdoVlcIywrbbDRH1xIG9rAsysyXni5VdVPhx2LcdI%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065910614%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=6o1OYa5CeVb9k45LVOlNEvC9WAANwxn3O%2FyHQCg%2BulM%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Ca4f43eebec784f2dec3608dc742be4a8%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638512979065915193%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=k02jqDwJgBAoYeKOIRWYf8qqK4jmfB140K%2FfSSsDHAE%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/evgeniy.brodskiy%40kyivstar.net>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee. I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ?? I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you... -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n...

For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC? Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net>:
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization. When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others. So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises. Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong. About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them. From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: sdy@a-n-t.ru; members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC? Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee. I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ?? I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you... -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is? If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too? On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :) In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...


Конфіденційно/Confidential Ok, please show exact place in ARIN policy which restrict ARIN members to provide services for EU customers and work in EU. ________________________________ От: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 9:54:44 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Копия: sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For you not, but for ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, etc.. do… I dont know, if you already red the policies, but i did. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>: Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization. When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others. So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises. Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong. About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them. From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: sdy@a-n-t.ru; members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC? Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee. I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ?? I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you... -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is? If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too? On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :) In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

What does this tells to you: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#9-out-of-region-use On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:04 PM Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Конфіденційно/Confidential
Ok, please show exact place in ARIN policy which restrict ARIN members to provide services for EU customers and work in EU.
------------------------------ *От:* Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> *Отправлено:* среда, мая 15, 2024 9:54:44 PM *Кому:* Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> *Копия:* sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru>; members-discuss@ripe.net < members-discuss@ripe.net> *Тема:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
For you not, but for ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, etc.. do…
I dont know, if you already red the policies, but i did.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
*Murat TERZIOGLU* *PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions*
Bochumer Str. 20
D-44866 Bochum
Telefon: 0234/58825994
Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de
m.terzioglu@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy < Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>:
Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization.
When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others.
So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises.
Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong.
About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them.
*From:* Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM *To:* Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> *Cc:* sdy@a-n-t.ru; members-discuss@ripe.net *Subject:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC?
Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
*Murat TERZIOGLU* *PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions*
Bochumer Str. 20
D-44866 Bochum
Telefon: 0234/58825994
Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de
m.terzioglu@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net>:
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different
members fee ?
________________________________
От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени
sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru>
Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM
Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>
Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM]
Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look!
If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to
equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S.
Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for
government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from
your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more
votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE.
Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due
to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request
proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg
eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f
9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown%
7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ
XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW
48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/
?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc
uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef
f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138
67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL
Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953
08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796
1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO
gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/
ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio
ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk
iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43
00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0
%3D&reserved=0>
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen
iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd
573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW
FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9
Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur
l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530
8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617
90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J
7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25
40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0
25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%
7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI
joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq%
2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/
inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma
n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data
=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7
4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935
1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6
Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6
DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Конфіденційно/Confidential Show, it is possible for EU company to be an ARIN member, but this requires some considerable effort. And even in case you don't want to be an ARIN member, how it of contradict first part of my answer. Wich promises was given to new LIR in RIPE and stay unrelised? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 10:15:24 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members What does this tells to you: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#9-out-of-region-use On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:04 PM Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> wrote: Конфіденційно/Confidential Ok, please show exact place in ARIN policy which restrict ARIN members to provide services for EU customers and work in EU. ________________________________ От: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 9:54:44 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Копия: sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For you not, but for ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, etc.. do… I dont know, if you already red the policies, but i did. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>>: Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization. When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others. So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises. Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong. About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them. From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC? Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee. I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ?? I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you... -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is? If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too? On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :) In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio<http://ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio> ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma<http://inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma> n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net<http://2540kyivstar.net/>&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Mate, i really dont get you. Until proof was provided you was arguing that there is no issue with that, after you got with proofs, now you are arguing and replying to me something that i didnt asked about it! We are talking about something else, read the whole mail list replies and you will get it. Cheers. On Wed, 15 May 2024, 21:59 Evgeniy Brodskiy, <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> wrote:
Конфіденційно/Confidential
Show, it is possible for EU company to be an ARIN member, but this requires some considerable effort.
And even in case you don't want to be an ARIN member, how it of contradict first part of my answer. Wich promises was given to new LIR in RIPE and stay unrelised?
------------------------------ *От:* members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> *Отправлено:* среда, мая 15, 2024 10:15:24 PM *Кому:* Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> *Копия:* members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> *Тема:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
What does this tells to you: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#9-out-of-region-use
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:04 PM Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Конфіденційно/Confidential
Ok, please show exact place in ARIN policy which restrict ARIN members to provide services for EU customers and work in EU.
------------------------------ *От:* Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> *Отправлено:* среда, мая 15, 2024 9:54:44 PM *Кому:* Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> *Копия:* sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru>; members-discuss@ripe.net < members-discuss@ripe.net> *Тема:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
For you not, but for ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, etc.. do…
I dont know, if you already red the policies, but i did.
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
*Murat TERZIOGLU* *PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions*
Bochumer Str. 20
D-44866 Bochum
Telefon: 0234/58825994
Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de
m.terzioglu@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy < Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>:
Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization.
When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others.
So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises.
Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong.
About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them.
*From:* Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM *To:* Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> *Cc:* sdy@a-n-t.ru; members-discuss@ripe.net *Subject:* Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC?
Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
*Murat TERZIOGLU* *PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions*
Bochumer Str. 20
D-44866 Bochum
Telefon: 0234/58825994
Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de
m.terzioglu@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net>:
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different
members fee ?
________________________________
От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени
sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru>
Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM
Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>
Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net>
Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM]
Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look!
If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to
equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S.
Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for
government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from
your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more
votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE.
Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due
to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request
proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg
eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f
9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown%
7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ
XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW
48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/
?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net <http://2flists.ripe.net/> %2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc
uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef
f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138
67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL
Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953
08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796
1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL
CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO
gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/
ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio
ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk
iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43
00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb
3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0
%3D&reserved=0>
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen
iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd
573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW
FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9
Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur
l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net <http://2flists.ripe.net/> %2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530
8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617
90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J
7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25
40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0
25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%
7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI
joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq%
2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/
inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma
n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data
=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7
4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935
1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6
Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6
DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...


Конфіденційно/Confidential Dear Murat, Sounds like you blame us to provide such service as static IP for part of our subscribers. May be you also look to another part of our business, to our contribution in IPv6 internet access. I am curious, do you have same amount of IPv6 users ?? From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 11:57 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: Mentor Leniqi <mentor.leniqi@albahost.net>; members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members I think you dont exactly know, what RIPE NCC does. Do you think, that the RIPE NCC is a supermarket? If i am not happy with it, i go to the next one? I understand, of course it is for Kyivstar only benefit resource: [cid:image001.jpg@01DAA725.632664A0] Статична IP-адреса від Київстар ✅ Як встановити послугу за вигідною ціною<https://kyivstar.ua/home-internet-services/home-internet/static-ip> kyivstar.ua<https://kyivstar.ua/home-internet-services/home-internet/static-ip> -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 22:00 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Конфіденційно/Confidential Show, it is possible for EU company to be an ARIN member, but this requires some considerable effort. And even in case you don't want to be an ARIN member, how it of contradict first part of my answer. Wich promises was given to new LIR in RIPE and stay unrelised? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 10:15:24 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members What does this tells to you: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#9-out-of-region-use On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:04 PM Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> wrote: Конфіденційно/Confidential Ok, please show exact place in ARIN policy which restrict ARIN members to provide services for EU customers and work in EU. ________________________________ От: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 9:54:44 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Копия: sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For you not, but for ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, etc.. do… I dont know, if you already red the policies, but i did. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>>: Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization. When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others. So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises. Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong. About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them. From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC? Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee. I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ?? I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you... -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is? If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too? On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :) In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio<http://ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio> ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma<http://inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma> n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net<http://2540kyivstar.net/>&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...


To be honest I have no idea. What is reason you asking me type of LIRs business ?? P.S. I am still interesting how wildly IPv6 presented in your network. From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2024 12:13 AM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: Mentor Leniqi <mentor.leniqi@albahost.net>; members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Does RIPE NCC offers resources only for ISPs? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 23:11 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>>: Конфіденційно/Confidential Dear Murat, Sounds like you blame us to provide such service as static IP for part of our subscribers. May be you also look to another part of our business, to our contribution in IPv6 internet access. I am curious, do you have same amount of IPv6 users ?? From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 11:57 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: Mentor Leniqi <mentor.leniqi@albahost.net<mailto:mentor.leniqi@albahost.net>>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members I think you dont exactly know, what RIPE NCC does. Do you think, that the RIPE NCC is a supermarket? If i am not happy with it, i go to the next one? I understand, of course it is for Kyivstar only benefit resource: <image001.jpg> Статична IP-адреса від Київстар ✅ Як встановити послугу за вигідною ціною<https://kyivstar.ua/home-internet-services/home-internet/static-ip> kyivstar.ua<https://kyivstar.ua/home-internet-services/home-internet/static-ip> -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 22:00 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Конфіденційно/Confidential Show, it is possible for EU company to be an ARIN member, but this requires some considerable effort. And even in case you don't want to be an ARIN member, how it of contradict first part of my answer. Wich promises was given to new LIR in RIPE and stay unrelised? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 10:15:24 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members What does this tells to you: https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#9-out-of-region-use On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:04 PM Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> wrote: Конфіденційно/Confidential Ok, please show exact place in ARIN policy which restrict ARIN members to provide services for EU customers and work in EU. ________________________________ От: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 9:54:44 PM Кому: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Копия: sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For you not, but for ARIN, RIPE NCC, APNIC, etc.. do… I dont know, if you already red the policies, but i did. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 20:37 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>>: Of course it is a reason if you disagree with RIPE policy and count RIPE as unfair organization. When you became LIR nobody promise you that you will pay per /24 or you obtain IP take away from others. So you shouldn’t have any unreleased promises. Briefly I don’t any restriction became ARIN member and work in EU. Hope more experienced participants of mailing list correct me if I am wrong. About resources of ARIN when you became ARIN member you can discuss it with them. From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de>> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:38 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>; members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members For example if my customers are in eu and i work in eu and my operation is in eu, would that be a reason, why i work with RIPE NCC? Show me the way for example, if it is possible to create a LIR on ARIN and work here in EU as a member of ARIN and with of course the resource of ARIN? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de/> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 19:27 schrieb Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>: Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee. I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ?? I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you... -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members It is not talk about "different members fee"! It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs. Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators. Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years! So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is? If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dear Jan. We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member! P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes. We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too? On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO. If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :) In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other! If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :) Do we really want that? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio<http://ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio> ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma<http://inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma> n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net<http://2540kyivstar.net/>&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0> ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...


*You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ?And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??* Argument of the year! If you know the RIR rules that well and accept as such, you would'n said that knowing that each RIR is based on continent/region. As an EU citizen/entity, you are forced to use RIPE NCC! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:27 PM Evgeniy Brodskiy via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n... _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

You still don't understand. We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests. Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources. It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

Dmitry, and why should they do that? Who cares about small members/comunnity? It is clear that those with big resource holders nor RIPE NCC don't want that, a proof you have with lates charging scheme with no option to refuse, and even if you abstain, it is enough 27 LIR members to vote and policy accepted! The majority who was and is against this? Leave it or take it, nobody cares about your voice as long as its in RIPE NCC and big boys interest :) On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:50 PM <sdy@a-n-t.ru> wrote:
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

This works as long as NCC members agree to the rising payments. It looks like something is changing. I think if NCС ignores this, it will end not good. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Dmitry, and why should they do that? Who cares about small members/comunnity? It is clear that those with big resource holders nor RIPE NCC don't want that, a proof you have with lates charging scheme with no option to refuse, and even if you abstain, it is enough 27 LIR members to vote and policy accepted! The majority who was and is against this? Leave it or take it, nobody cares about your voice as long as its in RIPE NCC and big boys interest :)
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:50 PM <sdy@a-n-t.ru> wrote:
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

Конфіденційно/Confidential Hi Mentor, I don’t understand who or what stops you from be able to voting ? As a LIR at the moment you have 1 voice and are able to vote for the best option for you own. And even more you can be a candidate of EB election. It is also possible for you. If you believe that majority of community supports you than all in your hands. From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:57 PM To: sdy@a-n-t.ru Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Dmitry, and why should they do that? Who cares about small members/comunnity? It is clear that those with big resource holders nor RIPE NCC don't want that, a proof you have with lates charging scheme with no option to refuse, and even if you abstain, it is enough 27 LIR members to vote and policy accepted! The majority who was and is against this? Leave it or take it, nobody cares about your voice as long as its in RIPE NCC and big boys interest :) On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:50 PM <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> wrote: You still don't understand. We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests. Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources. It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/ ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://lis/ ts.ripe.net<http://ts.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prote/ ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio<http://ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio> ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru<http://2540a-n-t.ru/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net<http://2flists.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://list/ s.ripe.net<http://s.ripe.net/>%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safel/ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma<http://inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma> n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net<http://2540kyivstar.net/>&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net<http://40kyivstar.net/>%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.n...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

I completely understand. I don’t see a big difference between rollback of IP allocation or rollback of RIPE membership it is the same set of rules. If you insist to change one action done in the past why somebody else cant insist to change other action done also in the past ? most of the LIRs are not satisfied - sorry it's completely speculative. I see a couple of very loud people in this mailing list but it is not a majority at all. Also a see a result of voting and it shows that your statement completely wrong. -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:50 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members You still don't understand. We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests. Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources. It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named -
"members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory.
You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but
not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same
time. How it is possible ?
And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR
for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your
point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs
according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to
provide access to Internet for our subscribers.
And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people
to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message-----
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of
sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM
To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM]
Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we
have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner
organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at
all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources
from different networks.
If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources,
then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about
different members fee ?
________________________________
От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени
sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>>
Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM
Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>>
Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>
Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM]
Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look!
If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to
equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S.
Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for
government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from
your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have
more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE.
Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due
to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would
request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEv
g
eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8
f
9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown
%
7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC
J
XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZ
W
48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com
/
?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-dis
c
uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4ae
f
f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513
8
67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
M
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8o
L Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru
&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95
3
08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679
6
1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
L
CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUM
O
gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prot
ection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.prote%2F&data=
05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc
7507a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851392284487
4695%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ
BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=o08p50r0jMeHbNLIlDMdb
we%2BuBbzD%2FPB%2Fs0Ev7F3hNQ%3D&reserved=0
ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Fopti
o
ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brods
k
iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4
3
00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
b
3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
D
%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR
0
%3D&reserved=0>
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvge
n
iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9b
d
573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CT
W
FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI
6
Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu
9
Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?u
r
l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss
&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953
0
8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961
7
90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ
B
TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41
J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2
5
40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b
0
25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0
%
7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
I
joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq
%
2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safe
links.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur01.safel%2F&data=0
5%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc75
07a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851392284488399
9%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI
6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3MNjvsSRG35oyi6O7RlBYUY4FW
oBb7gZdI9OIAdqdW4%3D&reserved=0
inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailm
a
n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&dat
a
=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc
7
4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617993
5
1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI
6
Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio
6
DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist<https://list/>
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen
iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc7507a197%7Cf8f9bd
573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513922844888720%7CUnknown%7CTW
FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cD6vnEm3QdmKXy%2FQEqCx8ETKbtm8H3HSOsVBxiGrEZ
c%3D&reserved=0
Unsubscribe:
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist<https://list/>
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%2540kyivst
ar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49
d0f18308dc7507a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513
922844893307%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZTlvhgkbdLpi3b2wE
ENRg%2B7FTV%2BXXpy%2FgPaIOB6FBaU%3D&reserved=0
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc7507a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513922844900183%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tQSXAUs%2FSN67X6neO1ep5bxdf6EHKST82zXuLlhozng%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%2540kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc7507a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513922844904939%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qIz4P87d1gkASCDmCXP3hhkJwH89Z7wg7F59MwjsLp8%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%40kyivstar.net>

May be... May be... Time will decide who is right. It was only first inflation step, with 23% payment rise. Next year it will be more and more. So discussion will not stop.
I completely understand.
I don’t see a big difference between rollback of IP allocation or rollback of RIPE membership it is the same set of rules.
If you insist to change one action done in the past why somebody else cant insist to change other action done also in the past ?
most of the LIRs are not satisfied - sorry it's completely speculative. I see a couple of very loud people in this mailing list but it is not a majority at all.
Also a see a result of voting and it shows that your statement completely wrong.
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:50 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments.
So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
It's in the best interest of the whole community.
----
Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named -
"members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory.
You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but
not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same
time. How it is possible ?
And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR
for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your
point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs
according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to
provide access to Internet for our subscribers.
And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people
to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message-----
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> On Behalf Of
sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM
To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net<mailto:Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net>>
Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM]
Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we
have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner
organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at
all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources
from different networks.
If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources,
then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about
different members fee ?
________________________________
От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> от имени
sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru> <sdy@a-n-t.ru<mailto:sdy@a-n-t.ru>>
Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM
Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si<mailto:jan@go6.si>>
Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>>
Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM]
Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look!
If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to
equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S.
Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for
government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from
your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have
more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE.
Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due
to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would
request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEv
g
eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8
f
9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown
%
7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLC
J
XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZ
W
48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com
/
?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-dis
c
uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4ae
f
f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513
8
67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2lu
M
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8o
L Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru
&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95
3
08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679
6
1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIi
L
CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUM
O
gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.prot
ection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.prote%2F&data=
05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc
7507a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851392284487
4695%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ
BTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=o08p50r0jMeHbNLIlDMdb
we%2BuBbzD%2FPB%2Fs0Ev7F3hNQ%3D&reserved=0
ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Fopti
o
ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brods
k
iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4
3
00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
b
3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
D
%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR
0
%3D&reserved=0>
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvge
n
iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9b
d
573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CT
W
FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI
6
Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu
9
Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?u
r
l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss
&
data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953
0
8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961
7
90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJ
B
TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41
J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0>
Unsubscribe:
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2
5
40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b
0
25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0
%
7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQ
I
joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq
%
2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://eur01.safe
links.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Feur01.safel%2F&data=0
5%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc75
07a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851392284488399
9%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI
6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=3MNjvsSRG35oyi6O7RlBYUY4FW
oBb7gZdI9OIAdqdW4%3D&reserved=0
inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailm
a
n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&dat
a
=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc
7
4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617993
5
1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI
6
Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio
6
DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist<https://list/>
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen
iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49d0f18308dc7507a197%7Cf8f9bd
573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513922844888720%7CUnknown%7CTW
FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6
Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=cD6vnEm3QdmKXy%2FQEqCx8ETKbtm8H3HSOsVBxiGrEZ
c%3D&reserved=0
Unsubscribe:
https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist<https://list/>
s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%2540kyivst
ar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7Cf7215f491f3e49
d0f18308dc7507a197%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513
922844893307%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM
zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZTlvhgkbdLpi3b2wE
ENRg%2B7FTV%2BXXpy%2FgPaIOB6FBaU%3D&reserved=0
-----------------------------
С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий
ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком"
+7(498)785-8-000 раб.
+7(495)940-92-11 доп.
+7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

HI, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 08:50:10PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments.
For an interesting definition of "most". Math is hard, but I said this upthread already. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

On 15 May 2024, at 19:50, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
I beg to differ. Most members are perfectly fine with the current situation and implicitly trust the Board to come up with reasonable charging scheme. Only a tiny percentage of members ever show up for a GM. Why is that? Very simple: GM meetings tend to be very boring. They’re mostly about budgets and charging schemes. The membership fee is very low and always has been: Most of us have QSFPs in our networks that cost more than the RIPE NCC membership. A single router costs 10-100x more and I buy them by the pallet. The membership fee is a vanishingly small part of our budget and that’s true for most members that run actual networks. There is a very small minority who’s unhappy with the situation because a few hundred euro is a big problem for them. And you know what? I don’t care. If there’s a charging scheme that makes me pay a little more to help those folks out, I’m fine with that. So please make some concrete proposals instead of just complaining about how unfair the world is. Maybe we should bring the Small, Medium, Large categories back, maybe we need something else. But remember, it was the membership, which now includes you, that voted to remove those categories.. Alex
It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw3ywIkEIW906kmHhXQzg591 ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://eur01.safelinks.prote/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1TOn2lX9mYmxWMnBElSVbY ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8 s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?ur&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw3ptX6zWQYdSSGsIYema9Z4 l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8 s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://eur01.safel/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1MrLfOkKy_iKEy4UopfPgZ inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8 Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%2540kyivstar.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8 Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn

Strongly agree! (Even if I show up at the GM.) -- Kind Regards Sebastian Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> im Auftrag von Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2024 um 11:53 An: sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 15 May 2024, at 19:50, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
I beg to differ. Most members are perfectly fine with the current situation and implicitly trust the Board to come up with reasonable charging scheme. Only a tiny percentage of members ever show up for a GM. Why is that? Very simple: GM meetings tend to be very boring. They’re mostly about budgets and charging schemes. The membership fee is very low and always has been: Most of us have QSFPs in our networks that cost more than the RIPE NCC membership. A single router costs 10-100x more and I buy them by the pallet. The membership fee is a vanishingly small part of our budget and that’s true for most members that run actual networks. There is a very small minority who’s unhappy with the situation because a few hundred euro is a big problem for them. And you know what? I don’t care. If there’s a charging scheme that makes me pay a little more to help those folks out, I’m fine with that. So please make some concrete proposals instead of just complaining about how unfair the world is. Maybe we should bring the Small, Medium, Large categories back, maybe we need something else. But remember, it was the membership, which now includes you, that voted to remove those categories.. Alex
It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flis%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110253071%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vuMJPm8YjBYJTi8VLnFVrfEZudzAD1oKkh64SdcnOTg%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO> ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3ywIkEIW906kmHhXQzg591&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110265093%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pPkNTA5BR%2BEqVg68OlAfIE1mD3klQK%2BV22ZxIOkESj0%3D&reserved=0 ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flis%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110273479%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=H4%2BDJYUFlKy0awxe3%2F3GykjQcgUFcT8pnfE1%2FhpKiPU%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO> ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.prote%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1TOn2lX9mYmxWMnBElSVbY&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110280953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ArKb7wT3A3f1QomLz4%2B%2FzuUn4ovtFgGZ7pnIlCnZLaQ%3D&reserved=0 ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flist%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110287627%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JsJU0Dggym9qubYlpQXs9%2BYh%2Bi8JLzHZmfafIUAxfPs%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8> s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Fur%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3ptX6zWQYdSSGsIYema9Z4&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110292620%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l1oJwhK%2FeqsQ2mqUYtQ7IngK%2BxauGg9HcEaIs5lJ3dQ%3D&reserved=0 l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flist%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110297456%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1XQD9CFVda8U0oYRL5q8tgSX3RNNx6usITtZfrFj%2FAo%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8> s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safel%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1MrLfOkKy_iKEy4UopfPgZ&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110302469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WiGk0JEiJd%2FopVEOi2mbPHBpWvMKLcQ98ucxnD9qk9U%3D&reserved=0 inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110306665%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=52z7bAIRbUHgddqftQqSMHgmF9JtX6GIqJelff5aUvo%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%252540kyivstar.net%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110310343%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q3hhFYWvrgSrlMzWZVjNOIllkRwQku3JZ%2BKDI%2FyI5Uc%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%2540kyivstar.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110314288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r8EtaeQGTsYTs61KqVuay%2FOj2E0CMSsmnpyu5xQYzDI%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Faleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110318924%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EyIwl1Q9EY1OK1aojbZMyQBbG5akdFVQgyIlqXVLjwg%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110323660%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NH21LNSWQ4aIQou0S5Wvv5Ke%2F5abG8dbZjxCIPHETvc%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsebastian-becker%2540telekom.de&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110328486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ON8y9SEwucL6868AUK0ZeDdi4BvtuKwBQ2npZx%2BqwMI%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sebastian-becker%40telekom.de>

No. I'll (and sure many else LIRs) be much more happy, if large holders give to each LIRs /20 Ipv4 than pay 100 euro for me more for year. No more small/large categories! Only flat payment for EVERY deficit resource now will make some progress in situation. ----- Dmitry Serbulov
Strongly agree! (Even if I show up at the GM.)
-- Kind Regards Sebastian
Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> im Auftrag von Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2024 um 11:53 An: sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 15 May 2024, at 19:50, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
I beg to differ.
Most members are perfectly fine with the current situation and implicitly trust the Board to come up with reasonable charging scheme.
Only a tiny percentage of members ever show up for a GM. Why is that?
Very simple:
GM meetings tend to be very boring. They’re mostly about budgets and charging schemes.
The membership fee is very low and always has been: Most of us have QSFPs in our networks that cost more than the RIPE NCC membership. A single router costs 10-100x more and I buy them by the pallet. The membership fee is a vanishingly small part of our budget and that’s true for most members that run actual networks.
There is a very small minority who’s unhappy with the situation because a few hundred euro is a big problem for them.
And you know what?
I don’t care.
If there’s a charging scheme that makes me pay a little more to help those folks out, I’m fine with that.
So please make some concrete proposals instead of just complaining about how unfair the world is.
Maybe we should bring the Small, Medium, Large categories back, maybe we need something else.
But remember, it was the membership, which now includes you, that voted to remove those categories..
Alex
It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote:
If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flis%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110253071%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vuMJPm8YjBYJTi8VLnFVrfEZudzAD1oKkh64SdcnOTg%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO> ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3ywIkEIW906kmHhXQzg591&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110265093%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pPkNTA5BR%2BEqVg68OlAfIE1mD3klQK%2BV22ZxIOkESj0%3D&reserved=0 ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flis%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110273479%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=H4%2BDJYUFlKy0awxe3%2F3GykjQcgUFcT8pnfE1%2FhpKiPU%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO> ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.prote%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1TOn2lX9mYmxWMnBElSVbY&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110280953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ArKb7wT3A3f1QomLz4%2B%2FzuUn4ovtFgGZ7pnIlCnZLaQ%3D&reserved=0 ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flist%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110287627%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JsJU0Dggym9qubYlpQXs9%2BYh%2Bi8JLzHZmfafIUAxfPs%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8> s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Fur%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3ptX6zWQYdSSGsIYema9Z4&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110292620%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l1oJwhK%2FeqsQ2mqUYtQ7IngK%2BxauGg9HcEaIs5lJ3dQ%3D&reserved=0 l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flist%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110297456%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1XQD9CFVda8U0oYRL5q8tgSX3RNNx6usITtZfrFj%2FAo%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8> s.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0<https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safel%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1MrLfOkKy_iKEy4UopfPgZ&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110302469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WiGk0JEiJd%2FopVEOi2mbPHBpWvMKLcQ98ucxnD9qk9U%3D&reserved=0 inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110306665%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=52z7bAIRbUHgddqftQqSMHgmF9JtX6GIqJelff5aUvo%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%252540kyivstar.net%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110310343%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q3hhFYWvrgSrlMzWZVjNOIllkRwQku3JZ%2BKDI%2FyI5Uc%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%2540kyivstar.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110314288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r8EtaeQGTsYTs61KqVuay%2FOj2E0CMSsmnpyu5xQYzDI%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Faleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110318924%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EyIwl1Q9EY1OK1aojbZMyQBbG5akdFVQgyIlqXVLjwg%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110323660%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NH21LNSWQ4aIQou0S5Wvv5Ke%2F5abG8dbZjxCIPHETvc%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsebastian-becker%2540telekom.de&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110328486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ON8y9SEwucL6868AUK0ZeDdi4BvtuKwBQ2npZx%2BqwMI%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sebastian-becker%40telekom.de>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

Dmitry, that's what other RIRs did except RIPE. And those who worked 25 years for the good of us/internet (new LIRs) in which we are "enjoying" now, in which they took the advantage and collected thousand of IPv4 space are the most against such model. The irony, they hide behind, as what they say "we are against model pay per resource usage" but in the same time, they "care" for RIPE NCC in small LIR shoulders! On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:13 PM <sdy@a-n-t.ru> wrote:
No.
I'll (and sure many else LIRs) be much more happy, if large holders give to each LIRs /20 Ipv4 than pay 100 euro for me more for year.
No more small/large categories! Only flat payment for EVERY deficit resource now will make some progress in situation. ----- Dmitry Serbulov
Strongly agree! (Even if I show up at the GM.)
-- Kind Regards Sebastian
Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> im Auftrag von Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2024 um 11:53 An: sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 15 May 2024, at 19:50, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
You still don't understand.
We didn't just agree to the rules (Ok), we all became equal members of the community. And this community can change the rules in their common interests.
Obviously, most of the LIRs are not satisfied with the current situation with a lack of access to resources and growing payments. So the rules need to be changed. And apparently 7% of those who own 84% of the resources will have to pay much more or release scarce resources.
I beg to differ.
Most members are perfectly fine with the current situation and implicitly trust the Board to come up with reasonable charging scheme.
Only a tiny percentage of members ever show up for a GM. Why is that?
Very simple:
GM meetings tend to be very boring. They’re mostly about budgets and charging schemes.
The membership fee is very low and always has been: Most of us have QSFPs in our networks that cost more than the RIPE NCC membership. A single router costs 10-100x more and I buy them by the pallet. The membership fee is a vanishingly small part of our budget and that’s true for most members that run actual networks.
There is a very small minority who’s unhappy with the situation because a few hundred euro is a big problem for them.
And you know what?
I don’t care.
If there’s a charging scheme that makes me pay a little more to help those folks out, I’m fine with that.
So please make some concrete proposals instead of just complaining about how unfair the world is.
Maybe we should bring the Small, Medium, Large categories back, maybe we need something else.
But remember, it was the membership, which now includes you, that voted to remove those categories..
Alex
It's in the best interest of the whole community. ---- Serbulov Dmitry
Sorry but actually it is talk about members fee. It is named - "members fee" and it is members fee.
I don’t think current situation is discriminatory. You Ok with membership rules that gave your ability to be a LIR but not Ok with IP addresses allocation rules which exists in the same time. How it is possible ? And more if in the moment you became a LIR why you chose RIPE as RIR for registry service if this organization so discriminatory from your point of view ??
I can't say for other large LIRs but our company obtained IPs according to RIPEN rules (yes it is not a gift it is procedure) to provide access to Internet for our subscribers. And we don't hold or sell IPs we use them to provide access for people to internet. Hope same as you...
-----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of sdy@a-n-t.ru Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 7:19 PM To: Evgeniy Brodskiy <Evgeniy.Brodskiy@kyivstar.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
It is not talk about "different members fee"!
It is talking about payment for network resources that we need, but we have not, but, as fact, pay for it use by another LIRs.
Let's not forget that the RIPE community and NCC is a partner organization for network management and interaction. And it is not at all a gathering of big players and address speculators.
Our main task is to organize non-discriminatory access to resources from different networks. If, as a result, now 7% of LIRs took 84% of the address resources, then we have clearly been doing something wrong all these years!
So, at least, another 93% LIRs must to think what is role of NCC is?
If it is all not about money maybe we can stop talking about different members fee ?
________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Отправлено: вторник, мая 14, 2024 6:38:26 PM Кому: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Dear Jan.
We have alternative look! If we all pay equal sum - lets devide RIPE ipv4 and AS numbers to equal parts for every NCC member!
P.S. Please - do not repeat paranoid idea: payment sum = number of votes.
We live in 21 century. Money now is not a fetish! When you vote for government in your country, do you proceed your votes numbers from your salary and taxes too?
On 14. 5. 24 15:05, ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED wrote: > If big organization pay a large amount of taxes - are they have more > votes? Im think so - NO.
If you have more shares in the company - you have more votes :)
> > In proportional model - you pay FIXED amount PER RESOURCE. > Why Big members must have more votes? They pay same as other!
If big members would pay significantly higher members fee price (due to larger IPv4 space), then it's only logical that they would request proportionally more votes at the GM :)
Do we really want that?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flis%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110253071%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=vuMJPm8YjBYJTi8VLnFVrfEZudzAD1oKkh64SdcnOTg%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO
ts.ripe.net %2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvg eniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f 9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961755557%7CUnknown% 7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJ XVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=8%2Fi1iRoNvI7tGvWJhCDBg0Zx4SHYAYssglZW 48G2LeI%3D&reserved=0< https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3ywIkEIW906kmHhXQzg591&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110265093%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pPkNTA5BR%2BEqVg68OlAfIE1mD3klQK%2BV22ZxIOkESj0%3D&reserved=0 ?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net %2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-disc uss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aef f95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138 67961767143%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luM zIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=iK0vg2BlbU88S8oL Em34i1VbWyr1KdVGnFVSgzDLUQI%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe:
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flis%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110273479%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=H4%2BDJYUFlKy0awxe3%2F3GykjQcgUFcT8pnfE1%2FhpKiPU%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lis/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0tG8nuWy6CCs1W4ACiM4iO
ts.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru & data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aeff953 08dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796 1773798%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FWKFnAaHkrWGRNVQHUMO gqUMdZkOs%2BSSUXMFV0s3b80%3D&reserved=0< https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.prote%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1TOn2lX9mYmxWMnBElSVbY&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110280953%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ArKb7wT3A3f1QomLz4%2B%2FzuUn4ovtFgGZ7pnIlCnZLaQ%3D&reserved=0
ction.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptio
ns%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsdy%2540a-n-t.ru &data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodsk iy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba43 00a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961780584%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D %7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qB7IxvJBzFfp%2FEsAWIfw9N8MTYHvE%2B4Rdd%2FBWt1RMR0 %3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flist%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110287627%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=JsJU0Dggym9qubYlpQXs9%2BYh%2Bi8JLzHZmfafIUAxfPs%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8
s.ripe.net %2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgen iy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd 573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513867961785548%7CUnknown%7CTW FpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6 Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fE4MKYVyC%2Bco%2Bobe2sc%2FPjH4b60xjMWGmqrwu9 Vr67U%3D&reserved=0< https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com%2F%3Fur%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3ptX6zWQYdSSGsIYema9Z4&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110292620%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=l1oJwhK%2FeqsQ2mqUYtQ7IngK%2BxauGg9HcEaIs5lJ3dQ%3D&reserved=0 l=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net %2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss& data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aeff9530 8dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C6385138679617 90163%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Qv4WFSNvzoMuwFJgSGqwp41J 7x%2Bol%2BTG%2F4ZPJbiBCxc%3D&reserved=0> Unsubscribe:
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flist%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110297456%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=1XQD9CFVda8U0oYRL5q8tgSX3RNNx6usITtZfrFj%2FAo%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://list/&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw1uu2WIpTzxPje42EGpRov8
s.ripe.net %2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%25 40kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b0 25607a4aeff95308dc74fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0% 7C638513867961794729%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQI joiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Zy8xvCPq% 2FOxlABKuDtSfytkedyghGLmByNpVlCp9aRM%3D&reserved=0< https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Feur01.safel%2F%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1MrLfOkKy_iKEy4UopfPgZ&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110302469%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WiGk0JEiJd%2FopVEOi2mbPHBpWvMKLcQ98ucxnD9qk9U%3D&reserved=0
inks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailma
n%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net &data =05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net %7C5e94b025607a4aeff95308dc7 4fada14%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C63851386796179935 1%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6 Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EQrPzOKI2oLeDbT%2F4KutSGRio6 DjAh753R3XYH6Mq7A%3D&reserved=0>
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110306665%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=52z7bAIRbUHgddqftQqSMHgmF9JtX6GIqJelff5aUvo%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8
Unsubscribe:
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fregistry%252540kyivstar.net%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110310343%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=q3hhFYWvrgSrlMzWZVjNOIllkRwQku3JZ%2BKDI%2FyI5Uc%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/registry%2540kyivstar.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw0jFn_O3MEeAfg-mPuXd9sD
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110314288%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=r8EtaeQGTsYTs61KqVuay%2FOj2E0CMSsmnpyu5xQYzDI%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw33VMbs18WmNVSCqAc-4tL8
Unsubscribe:
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Faleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1716400278000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110318924%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EyIwl1Q9EY1OK1aojbZMyQBbG5akdFVQgyIlqXVLjwg%3D&reserved=0 < https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1716400278000000&usg=AOvVaw10FOm99DSnRuEUDtx5CFbn
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110323660%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NH21LNSWQ4aIQou0S5Wvv5Ke%2F5abG8dbZjxCIPHETvc%3D&reserved=0 <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss>
Unsubscribe:
https://deu01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fsebastian-becker%2540telekom.de&data=05%7C02%7CSebastian-Becker%40telekom.de%7C5de352f9a7c74083e03308dc758e0a1e%7Cbde4dffc4b604cf68b04a5eeb25f5c4f%7C0%7C0%7C638514500110328486%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ON8y9SEwucL6868AUK0ZeDdi4BvtuKwBQ2npZx%2BqwMI%3D&reserved=0 < https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sebastian-becker%40te...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:11:17PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
I'll (and sure many else LIRs) be much more happy, if large holders give to each LIRs /20 Ipv4 than pay 100 euro for me more for year.
They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves. So, lots of new LIRs showed up, and used all the remaining IPv4. Now we have a new generation of "new LIRs" that complain again. $ host -t aaaa a-n-t.ru a-n-t.ru has no AAAA record if you stick yourself in the past, the past will haunt you. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

No AAAA? Because I can't give normal access services by IPv6 now! Why? For 25 years LIRs talking web resources and programs migration not happen! Why? To much talking, too bad economic model. --- Dmitry Serbulov
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:11:17PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
I'll (and sure many else LIRs) be much more happy, if large holders give to each LIRs /20 Ipv4 than pay 100 euro for me more for year.
They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves.
So, lots of new LIRs showed up, and used all the remaining IPv4.
Now we have a new generation of "new LIRs" that complain again.
$ host -t aaaa a-n-t.ru a-n-t.ru has no AAAA record
if you stick yourself in the past, the past will haunt you.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:29:19PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
No AAAA?
Because I can't give normal access services by IPv6 now! Why? For 25 years LIRs talking web resources and programs migration not happen! Why? To much talking, too bad economic model.
IPv6 can be deployed just fine. Yes, there are sometimes corner cases where things do not work right, or create extra work, or some vendors do not deliver what they promise (and you still need a bit of IPv4 to run translation services for all the other networks that do not get their work done). *Not* deploying IPv6 and complaining about the state the world is in will not solve anything. Even if we could find enough IPv4 so *you* can continue to ignore the problem the next LIR will step up and complain that *you* got so much IPv4, and they cannot have enough. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

"Wai Jesus, why are you teaching me to live, Fima?" Gert, I take it you ran out of arguments and decided to discuss personalities? Don't worry, our company will work in the same conditions that I propose. We will also pay and will also have to migrate to IPv6. Why should I do something now that I don't need to! There will be another economic model - there will be incentives - there will be movement. And stop looking at everyone's personal interests! The question now is how to break the global dead end with rising costs and lack of access to resources. The community was not created to feed the bureaucracy and throw up their hands: "it just happened." It was created to solve problems, and it's time to deal with them!
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:29:19PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
No AAAA?
Because I can't give normal access services by IPv6 now! Why? For 25 years LIRs talking web resources and programs migration not happen! Why? To much talking, too bad economic model.
IPv6 can be deployed just fine. Yes, there are sometimes corner cases where things do not work right, or create extra work, or some vendors do not deliver what they promise (and you still need a bit of IPv4 to run translation services for all the other networks that do not get their work done).
*Not* deploying IPv6 and complaining about the state the world is in will not solve anything. Even if we could find enough IPv4 so *you* can continue to ignore the problem the next LIR will step up and complain that *you* got so much IPv4, and they cannot have enough.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
And stop looking at everyone's personal interests! The question now is how to break the global dead end with rising costs and lack of access to resources.
There is no way to fix the "lack of IPv4 addresses". Not with less IPv4 addresses available (even if 100% utilized) than there are number of people on this planet. IPv4 blocks can be distributed around differently, and then someone else will complain louder - and inevitably, costs will rise, as long as the Internet is growing, and people rely on IPv4. Nothing of this is news, and it's not like we didn't tell this to people for more than 20 years. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Not agree with you. 1. NAT technology and working through it software grow up on with 25 years. 2. Current Network management, Security and Privacy model in IPv4 much lucky then in IPv6 for me. The most problem is that there is no economic or regulatory stimulus for ALL migration to IPv6. Big resource holders have interests to froze situation. We need regulation or economic stimulus to move to IPv6. In economic - it is pay more for each IPv4. In regulation? ОК - let's for 5 years politics start each LIR return each year 10% of IPv4 to unused space. Do you like it? --- Dmitry Serbulov
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 02:01:06PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
And stop looking at everyone's personal interests! The question now is how to break the global dead end with rising costs and lack of access to resources.
There is no way to fix the "lack of IPv4 addresses". Not with less IPv4 addresses available (even if 100% utilized) than there are number of people on this planet. IPv4 blocks can be distributed around differently, and then someone else will complain louder - and inevitably, costs will rise, as long as the Internet is growing, and people rely on IPv4.
Nothing of this is news, and it's not like we didn't tell this to people for more than 20 years.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

The community was not created to feed the bureaucracy and throw up their hands: "it just happened." It was created to solve problems, and it's time to deal with them!
Am Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2024, 13:01:06 CEST schrieb sdy@a-n-t.ru: thank you! ß) -- --- Niels Dettenbach Syndicat IT & Internet https://www.syndicat.com PGP: https://syndicat.com/pub_key.asc ---

You can enable IPv6 on *your* services. For some reason, you didn't. It's time to start with yourself. You cannot blame others. If you haven't deployed IPv6 in your network, it's your fault. And even if you increase payments for IPv4, those addresses will *not* return to the free pool. That's just a dream of lazy people, who didn't deployed IPv6. That dream will never come true. Nobody will return addresses to pool for free, if he when can sell them with profit. The market is hungry and will pay for them. - Daniel On 5/16/24 12:29 PM, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
Because I can't give normal access services by IPv6 now! Why? For 25 years LIRs talking web resources and programs migration not happen! Why? To much talking, too bad economic model. --- Dmitry Serbulov

And here we have your spacenet AG graph in which you were alerting all members to implement IPv6 for 25 years, and your IPv6 percentage is: 1.67% https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/AS5539?c=DE&p=1&v=1&w=30&x=1 But you still keep telling others to use IPv6 only! On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:25 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 01:11:17PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
I'll (and sure many else LIRs) be much more happy, if large holders give to each LIRs /20 Ipv4 than pay 100 euro for me more for year.
They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves.
So, lots of new LIRs showed up, and used all the remaining IPv4.
Now we have a new generation of "new LIRs" that complain again.
$ host -t aaaa a-n-t.ru a-n-t.ru has no AAAA record
if you stick yourself in the past, the past will haunt you.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:30:30PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
And here we have your spacenet AG graph in which you were alerting all members to implement IPv6 for 25 years, and your IPv6 percentage is: 1.67% https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/AS5539?c=DE&p=1&v=1&w=30&x=1
But you still keep telling others to use IPv6 only!
We have only very few access (eyeball) customers, so the numbers apnic is seeing from us are not very reliable. I'm still surprised that the numbers are *that* low - the charts show that we had close to 100% in 2018-2019, 80+% "IPv6 preferred" in 2021, and then I guess something happened in Geoff's measurement which made it drop to close-to-zero - maybe Corona, nobody coming to the offices anymore etc. In our hosting environment, every customer has IPv6, though we can not force customers to actually use it. So you'll see some hosted web sites with v4+v6 and some on v4-only. www.space.net, mail.space.net, v6.de etc had IPv6 since 1999 or so. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

No not really, it is very accurate, since i can see our own graph and is perfectly fine and pretty telling the truth! On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 1:07 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:30:30PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
And here we have your spacenet AG graph in which you were alerting all members to implement IPv6 for 25 years, and your IPv6 percentage is: 1.67% https://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/AS5539?c=DE&p=1&v=1&w=30&x=1
But you still keep telling others to use IPv6 only!
We have only very few access (eyeball) customers, so the numbers apnic is seeing from us are not very reliable. I'm still surprised that the numbers are *that* low - the charts show that we had close to 100% in 2018-2019, 80+% "IPv6 preferred" in 2021, and then I guess something happened in Geoff's measurement which made it drop to close-to-zero - maybe Corona, nobody coming to the offices anymore etc.
In our hosting environment, every customer has IPv6, though we can not force customers to actually use it. So you'll see some hosted web sites with v4+v6 and some on v4-only.
www.space.net, mail.space.net, v6.de etc had IPv6 since 1999 or so.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:04:25PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
No not really, it is very accurate, since i can see our own graph and is perfectly fine and pretty telling the truth!
So what exactly are you measuring? Geoff is measuring eyeball visits, by means of ads delivered and DNS queries / http requests executed, which is necessarily skewed for a network with very few eyeballs. So, what is your measurement approach? Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

This: -have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? I won't but you should. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 3:50 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:04:25PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
No not really, it is very accurate, since i can see our own graph and is perfectly fine and pretty telling the truth!
So what exactly are you measuring? Geoff is measuring eyeball visits, by means of ads delivered and DNS queries / http requests executed, which is necessarily skewed for a network with very few eyeballs.
So, what is your measurement approach?
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:54:28PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
This:
-have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? I won't but you should.
Not today, actually, as I've not done anything useful today, just argued on mailing lists. But over the last few days, yes, quite a few machines with v6 (including a very stubborn OpenIndiana 2024 system which needs extra guidance to make v6 config persistent). That you are resorting to personal attacks now, after being asked to explain your measurement methodology, is answer enough, though. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

You don't really care about arguments, the same you did with charging model like other RIRs, and you argued that because of this model alot of LIRs from other RIRs moved to ripe, while i wondered how much you pointed out go and find yourself, i found it and provided to you. Which it was the opposite of what you've said. It has nothing to do with personal attack, it has to do with because you are instructing other LIR members for as per your words "over 25 years" to implement IPv6, but you didn't implemented for over 25 years guess how much 1.6%! On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:23 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:54:28PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
This:
-have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? I won't but you should.
Not today, actually, as I've not done anything useful today, just argued on mailing lists. But over the last few days, yes, quite a few machines with v6 (including a very stubborn OpenIndiana 2024 system which needs extra guidance to make v6 config persistent).
That you are resorting to personal attacks now, after being asked to explain your measurement methodology, is answer enough, though.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 04:30:28PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
You don't really care about arguments, the same you did with charging model like other RIRs, and you argued that because of this model alot of LIRs from other RIRs moved to ripe,
That argument wasn't made by me. I never actually did comparisons with other RIRs, just pointed out factual incorrectnesses (like "you cannot have space from RIR A and use it in RIR B region").
It has nothing to do with personal attack, it has to do with because you are instructing other LIR members for as per your words "over 25 years" to implement IPv6, but you didn't implemented for over 25 years guess how much 1.6%!
I asked how you come to that conclusion, and you came back with "you are not doing IPv6 deployment", which is, well, no idea how to respond to that. I explained why Geoff's measurement need to be carefully looked at (and that they had 100% in earlier times) but you are not interested, it seems. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

* Look, i really don't need to argue with you because it's worthless it's not *>* just AfriNIC but all the RIRs require almost the same. And, do me a favour, *>* find me the statistic that the LIRs from other RIRs moved to RIPE just *>* because of price per resource holder.
* It is true, and stop making other members less knowledgeable! We all know *>* to read the RIR rules, and we can see the inter-RIR transfers. Almost not a *>* single one moved to RIPE because of price/model charged by resource holder *>* but because mostly EU companies buys those IPv4 space!
Here we go: Gert Doering gert at space.net <members-discuss%40ripe.net?Subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bmembers-discuss%5D%20How%20can%20I%20vote%20against%20Charging%20Scheme%20A%2C%0A%20B%20and%20C&In-Reply-To=%3CZkXaBQ7MTyDN7WnG%40Space.Net%3E> *Thu May 16 12:03:49 CEST 2024* Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:57:53AM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote: * I'm not going to do your homework. I just correct factually incorrect claims, because some other reader might actually believe all this - and that would start doing more harm. Gert Doering There was pointed that, if we vote for a model charge per resource holder just like all other RIR have such policy, someone or i believe Murat pointed that because of such model big boys will move away from RIPE to other RIRs, i asked/wondered how many of LIRs non-RIPE moved to RIPE because of such model, you said that go and find out yourself which i found it. Your reply: Gert Doering gert at space.net <members-discuss%40ripe.net?Subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bmembers-discuss%5D%20How%20can%20I%20vote%20against%20Charging%20Scheme%20A%2C%0A%20B%20and%20C&In-Reply-To=%3CZkXbWqxJn7CKeUdM%40Space.Net%3E> *Thu May 16 12:09:30 CEST 2024* Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:06:07PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote: * So how do you read that from the available data? Unless backed by data, I call it an unfounded claim... Gert Doering you can clearly see that it was noone moved to RIPE because of charging model pay per resource which is openly here: https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/resource-transfers-and-mergers/tran... Now regarding obtain the resource from other RIR, while you are in Eu/RIPE region and use into RIPE region from other RIRs, you clearly pointed that except AFRINIC others don't have such policies. Article 9 of ARIN prevent or at least you would need registered business in Arin region and i am not going to lose my time with you which is worthless arguing with you regarding this really. It is known that and you can't think nor say that all other RIRs are doing wrong except RIPE doing right regarding charging model. It is very simple, pay per resource holder is the way to go, there is no other fair method. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:37 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 04:30:28PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
You don't really care about arguments, the same you did with charging model like other RIRs, and you argued that because of this model alot of LIRs from other RIRs moved to ripe,
That argument wasn't made by me. I never actually did comparisons with other RIRs, just pointed out factual incorrectnesses (like "you cannot have space from RIR A and use it in RIR B region").
It has nothing to do with personal attack, it has to do with because you are instructing other LIR members for as per your words "over 25 years" to implement IPv6, but you didn't implemented for over 25 years guess how much 1.6%!
I asked how you come to that conclusion, and you came back with "you are not doing IPv6 deployment", which is, well, no idea how to respond to that. I explained why Geoff's measurement need to be carefully looked at (and that they had 100% in earlier times) but you are not interested, it seems.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Just to reiterate this:
They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves.
There are numerous discussions in the address policy archives where IPv4 allocations were gradually made more restrictive to slow down the burn rate, whilst others advocated running out as quickly as possible in an attempt to force the deployment of, and transition to, IPv6. Cheers, Rob

Rob, believe me, those who burnet IPv4 space like Gert will never transition to IPv6, we have an example Gert for that in which he has for 25 years alerting members to implement IPv6 but he/his company has for 25 years implemented 1.6% of IPv6! Btw my new moto is from now on: -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? Because i will never do, but you should do it :) On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:54 PM Rob Evans <rhe@nosc.ja.net> wrote:
Just to reiterate this:
They did, actually. All the old LIRs created policies to ensure that new LIRs could still get some IPv4, instead of using it all up themselves.
There are numerous discussions in the address policy archives where IPv4 allocations were gradually made more restrictive to slow down the burn rate, whilst others advocated running out as quickly as possible in an attempt to force the deployment of, and transition to, IPv6.
Cheers, Rob
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

On 16/05/2024 12:51, Alex Le Heux wrote:
The membership fee is very low and always has been: Most of us have QSFPs in our networks that cost more than the RIPE NCC membership. A single router costs 10-100x more and I buy them by the pallet. The membership fee is a vanishingly small part of our budget and that’s true for most members that run actual networks.
There is a very small minority who’s unhappy with the situation because a few hundred euro is a big problem for them.
+1!! -Hank

Jan, that has nothing to do with VOTES but with holding resources! And if you think that we as a small LIR with one /24 are asked for anything then you can see here that it's not the case here! Nobody cares about our opinions, they do whatever they want! On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:59 PM Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> wrote:
On 14. 5. 24 14:51, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space!
Careful what you wish for... as then the big members would require many more votes, because they pay more. Would you be happy with 1 vote and big LIR having 1000 votes?
Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Do you think, that the members doesn’t know, what they want? https://www.ripe.net/media/images/Where_Your_Fee_Goes_Draft_Activity_Plan_an... Look at this chart and share us, why should I pay these costs same as the Telekom, or Orange??? I pay for my /24 subnet 29€ this year only for RIPE database. But Telekom owns more than /8 subnet (calculated) and they pay alsi 29€? Who would agree this? I know who would agree this... (This is not a question to you..) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Jan Zorz - Go6 Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 14:59 An: members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members On 14. 5. 24 14:51, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space!
Careful what you wish for... as then the big members would require many more votes, because they pay more. Would you be happy with 1 vote and big LIR having 1000 votes? Cheers, Jan _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

On 14. May 2024, at 14:51, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Murat TERZIOGLU, actually the main issue is that there is no equality on the membership between LIRs, since we with one /24 pay the same amount as Sebastian with 100k of IPv4 space! And of course, those members with alot of resources feels comfortable with it! I would like to see those confortability, if there would be an policy/adoption to raise the membership fees to members like Sebastian by 5x more, and let see if he is comfortable with it!
There already was a charging scheme with different member sizes. The membership decided to abandon this in favour of a simpler charging scheme. There were options for a charging scheme with this kind of structure and these options did not get the required votes. Seems the majority want’s the simpler option. But feel free to suggest it again and see if that has changed. I’m fine with that. Don’t assume that other people are just here to get the cheapest membership possible. Best Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

On 14. May 2024, at 14:45, <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote:
Hi,
do you know, how many members took part to the votes? If you compare to the participation generally, it is a big part. And of course it is a reaction of the members, many members.
The statement was that a large portion *of the membership* supported the proposal. That is simply not true. Also the members that vote are not the same group of people that supported the proposal.
And the Sponsoring LIR is not a option.
Why?
In anyway, if the small resource holder, whereas they are about more than 60% of actual members, make consolidation or move to other options, the problem will again occur for remaining members and the board will try to ensure the budget...
Sure, that might be the case. We already hat higher membership fees in the past and if more LIRs leave then they will increase again. This is not something that should surprise anyone. And when “small resource holders” make “consolidations” in the most cases this means they only registered in the first place to get more IPv4 space by gaming the system. We see that effect already. That’s just how it is.
So we will have discussion again. And we don’t have this discussion in this year only. For years there is no solution for this problem and the 700 people showed their reaction in different contexts.
The solution is to discuss the Activity Plan and convince the membership that there should be changes in the plan.
"Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you." By the way, this is not your decision I think.. This is not a private family company...
If people complain that the fees are too high for them I think it is reasonable to suggest cheaper alternatives.
If I were someone who owns for example /15 subnet, of course I would prefer to have the offered proposals because the others with only /24 or /23 subnet pay for my resources also…
No you don’t. You pay for your membership. Resources don’t consume money. Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

Thanks for your response.
No you don’t. You pay for your membership. Resources don’t consume money.
https://www.ripe.net/media/images/Where_Your_Fee_Goes_Draft_Activity_Plan_an... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Sebastian Wiesinger Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 15:46 An: members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 14. May 2024, at 14:45, <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote:
Hi,
do you know, how many members took part to the votes? If you compare to the participation generally, it is a big part. And of course it is a reaction of the members, many members.
The statement was that a large portion *of the membership* supported the proposal. That is simply not true. Also the members that vote are not the same group of people that supported the proposal.
And the Sponsoring LIR is not a option.
Why?
In anyway, if the small resource holder, whereas they are about more than 60% of actual members, make consolidation or move to other options, the problem will again occur for remaining members and the board will try to ensure the budget...
Sure, that might be the case. We already hat higher membership fees in the past and if more LIRs leave then they will increase again. This is not something that should surprise anyone. And when “small resource holders” make “consolidations” in the most cases this means they only registered in the first place to get more IPv4 space by gaming the system. We see that effect already. That’s just how it is.
So we will have discussion again. And we don’t have this discussion in this year only. For years there is no solution for this problem and the 700 people showed their reaction in different contexts.
The solution is to discuss the Activity Plan and convince the membership that there should be changes in the plan.
"Or just quit being a member if you feel it is not worth it. Sponsoring LIRs are available to you." By the way, this is not your decision I think.. This is not a private family company...
If people complain that the fees are too high for them I think it is reasonable to suggest cheaper alternatives.
If I were someone who owns for example /15 subnet, of course I would prefer to have the offered proposals because the others with only /24 or /23 subnet pay for my resources also…
No you don’t. You pay for your membership. Resources don’t consume money. Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

On 14. May 2024, at 16:03, <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote:
No you don’t. You pay for your membership. Resources don’t consume money.
https://www.ripe.net/media/images/Where_Your_Fee_Goes_Draft_Activity_Plan_an...
What do you want to say? That a /8 costs more money in the database than a /24? I don’t get your point. Best Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

The chart is self explanatory. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Sebastian Wiesinger Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 16:06 An: members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
On 14. May 2024, at 16:03, <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote:
No you don’t. You pay for your membership. Resources don’t consume money.
https://www.ripe.net/media/images/Where_Your_Fee_Goes_Draft_Activity_P lan_and_Bu.width-800.png
What do you want to say? That a /8 costs more money in the database than a /24? I don’t get your point. Best Regards Sebastian -- Sebastian Wiesinger Senior Principal Network Architect Service Integration noris network AG Thomas-Mann-Straße 16-20 90471 Nürnberg Deutschland Tel +49 911 9352 1459 Fax +49 911 9352 100 Email sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de noris network AG - Mehr Leistung als Standard Vorstand: Ingo Kraupa (Vorsitzender), Joachim Astel, Florian Sippel Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Stefan Schnabel - AG Nürnberg HRB 17689

On Tue May 14, 2024 at 04:59:31PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
The chart is self explanatory.
Clearly it's not, because I don't understand what you're trying to say either. Which item on that chart is directly related to the number of IPv4 addresses that a member has? Simon

Unfortunately, i dont have budget for "Community Building"... I paid already enough for RIPE NCC... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Simon Lockhart <simon@slimey.org> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Mai 2024 17:02 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Sebastian Wiesinger' <sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de>; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members On Tue May 14, 2024 at 04:59:31PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
The chart is self explanatory.
Clearly it's not, because I don't understand what you're trying to say either. Which item on that chart is directly related to the number of IPv4 addresses that a member has? Simon

On Tue May 14, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
Unfortunately, i dont have budget for "Community Building"... I paid already enough for RIPE NCC...
Then make the case when the activity plan is next discussed that Community Building should be dropped from the activity plan. The Activity Plan isn't a shopping list. You can't chose which bits of it you want to buy. They are the things you get by paying to be a RIPE member. If you don't want to pay for, and therefore have the benefits of, being a RIPE member then there are other options - such as having your numbering resources held by a sponsoring LIR. Simon

Hi, On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
Unfortunately, i dont have budget for "Community Building"... I paid already enough for RIPE NCC...
Which is, I think, part of the problem here. The Internet works because many different companies that all compete with each other business-wise have to cooperate to "make that thing work", and this is really helped by having people to talk to, get and offer advice, and so on. Namely, a community of network folks. So, I see "community building" and "keep the governments off our backs" (by outreach, training, etc.) as fundamental pillars of the work the RIPE NCC does, for all of us. And we're happy to fund that. And no, this has nothing to do with how many resources a LIR has. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hello, You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900€ yearly. Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets. This has a commercial benefit. Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs.. Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal... But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024 16:17 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org>; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hi, On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
Unfortunately, i don’t have budget for "Community Building"... I paid already enough for RIPE NCC...
Which is, I think, part of the problem here. The Internet works because many different companies that all compete with each other business-wise have to cooperate to "make that thing work", and this is really helped by having people to talk to, get and offer advice, and so on. Namely, a community of network folks. So, I see "community building" and "keep the governments off our backs" (by outreach, training, etc.) as fundamental pillars of the work the RIPE NCC does, for all of us. And we're happy to fund that. And no, this has nothing to do with how many resources a LIR has. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Exactly, and interestingly those with a huge amount of IPv4 space are the loudest and so called "care too much for RIPE NCC"! Cheers. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 5:04 PM <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote:
Hello,
You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs
You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900€ yearly.
Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets.
This has a commercial benefit.
Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs..
Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal...
But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible...
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS
Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland
Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de info@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024 16:17 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org>; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Hi,
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
Unfortunately, i don’t have budget for "Community Building"... I paid already enough for RIPE NCC...
Which is, I think, part of the problem here.
The Internet works because many different companies that all compete with each other business-wise have to cooperate to "make that thing work", and this is really helped by having people to talk to, get and offer advice, and so on.
Namely, a community of network folks.
So, I see "community building" and "keep the governments off our backs" (by outreach, training, etc.) as fundamental pillars of the work the RIPE NCC does, for all of us. And we're happy to fund that.
And no, this has nothing to do with how many resources a LIR has.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:08:14PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Exactly, and interestingly those with a huge amount of IPv4 space are the loudest and so called "care too much for RIPE NCC"!
"Loudest" is not exactly how I would call my contributions. Those that make an enormous amount of noise here are those that want all the benefits and have others pay for it. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

It is really simple Gert! Split your resource with us who have only one /24, and you won't hear us complaining about this! I see that you have a "moto" (*have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?) *Why not release/return IPv4, and stay on your moto with IPv6 :) Where did you get "*Those that make an enormous amount of noise here are those that want all the benefits and have others pay for it*."?! Aren't we all paying the same fee of membership with one /24 a.k.a you 100+ /24? And because of this, we are complaining. You know, ripe uses database to store things/network etc, as per your logic, the database size is the same for /24 and for 100+x/24? If yes, then you/RIPE have my vote, if no, you should and members like you should pay 5-10x more than those with one /24. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 5:11 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:08:14PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Exactly, and interestingly those with a huge amount of IPv4 space are the loudest and so called "care too much for RIPE NCC"!
"Loudest" is not exactly how I would call my contributions.
Those that make an enormous amount of noise here are those that want all the benefits and have others pay for it.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
It is really simple Gert! Split your resource with us who have only one /24, and you won't hear us complaining about this! I see that you have a "moto" (*have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?) *Why not release/return IPv4, and stay on your moto with IPv6 :) Where did you get "*Those that make an enormous amount of noise here are those that want all the benefits and have others pay for it*."?! Aren't we all paying the same fee of membership with one /24 a.k.a you 100+ /24? And because of this, we are complaining. You know, ripe uses database to store things/network etc, as per your logic, the database size is the same for /24 and for 100+x/24? If yes, then you/RIPE have my vote, if no, you should and members like you should pay 5-10x more than those with one /24.
So we're now making those that do properly document their end-user assignments (= lots of database objects) pay more than those who are sloppy in documenting? That does not sound like a really good idea. And yes, I have understood your point, no need to repeat it another 473 times. YOU HAVE MORE RESOURCES THAN I HAVE SO YOU MUST PAY MORE. No, this is not how membership organizations work - RIPE NCC is not renting out address space (and there are very good tax reasons against moving there). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

I believe RIPE it is the only RIR who charges its members the same amount no matter the resource holder! Other RIRs like APNIC and many other RIRs: https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/member-f... have a great and fair solution about resource holders. If you believe that only you and or RIPE is right then tell other RIRs should be sued! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:16 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
It is really simple Gert! Split your resource with us who have only one /24, and you won't hear us complaining about this! I see that you have a "moto" (*have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?) *Why not release/return IPv4, and stay on your moto with IPv6 :) Where did you get "*Those that make an enormous amount of noise here are those that want all the benefits and have others pay for it*."?! Aren't we all paying the same fee of membership with one /24 a.k.a you 100+ /24? And because of this, we are complaining. You know, ripe uses database to store things/network etc, as per your logic, the database size is the same for /24 and for 100+x/24? If yes,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:22:09PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote: then
you/RIPE have my vote, if no, you should and members like you should pay 5-10x more than those with one /24.
So we're now making those that do properly document their end-user assignments (= lots of database objects) pay more than those who are sloppy in documenting? That does not sound like a really good idea.
And yes, I have understood your point, no need to repeat it another 473 times. YOU HAVE MORE RESOURCES THAN I HAVE SO YOU MUST PAY MORE.
No, this is not how membership organizations work - RIPE NCC is not renting out address space (and there are very good tax reasons against moving there).
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:20:05PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
I believe RIPE it is the only RIR who charges its members the same amount no matter the resource holder! Other RIRs like APNIC and many other RIRs: https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/member-f... have a great and fair solution about resource holders.
Again that funny argument that this would be "more fair". I could argue that you should be charged more, because you are posting so much to the ripe-members list, which costs lots of time. Wouldn't that be "more fair"?
If you believe that only you and or RIPE is right then tell other RIRs should be sued!
I do not need to sue anyone. The members have voted last year that they did not want the category scheme proposed. Very easy. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it? On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:26 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:20:05PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
I believe RIPE it is the only RIR who charges its members the same amount no matter the resource holder! Other RIRs like APNIC and many other RIRs:
https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/member-f...
have a great and fair solution about resource holders.
Again that funny argument that this would be "more fair". I could argue that you should be charged more, because you are posting so much to the ripe-members list, which costs lots of time. Wouldn't that be "more fair"?
If you believe that only you and or RIPE is right then tell other RIRs should be sued!
I do not need to sue anyone. The members have voted last year that they did not want the category scheme proposed. Very easy.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it?
That's back to "I want everyone else to pay more, and I want to pay less". I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should pay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like, because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or something else). So, a reasonable compromise seems to be "all members pay the same", and this is what members vote for, multiple times. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Pardon me for interrupting. But is it such a hard concept for everyone to meet in the middle and agree that we should all probably pay a little less? I think a good starting point is simply asking why does the budget need to be so large to begin with? Daniel~ On 5/15/24 11:36 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it? That's back to "I want everyone else to pay more, and I want to pay less".
I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should pay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like, because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or something else).
So, a reasonable compromise seems to be "all members pay the same", and this is what members vote for, multiple times.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

"Members voted" members like you, not the opposite. Oh and btw: *I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* shouldpay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like,because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, orsomething else).* "you" builded whole thing and of course most likely and its crystal clear that you benefited from this. If you really would care too much about this build that "you" did for "us" to grant that much from your "build" be fair and accept the reality and implement a policy like other RIRs based on resource holder! Why are you so strongly against this if "you" builded for us?! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:36 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it?
That's back to "I want everyone else to pay more, and I want to pay less".
I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should pay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like, because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or something else).
So, a reasonable compromise seems to be "all members pay the same", and this is what members vote for, multiple times.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:03:34PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs
You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900??? yearly.
Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets.
This has a commercial benefit.
We have paid RIPE fees for over 25 years now. Maybe we have paid enough, and only the newcomers should pay now? Silly arguments can be made in all directions.
Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs..
I've been around for a while, and helped build all this, which you want for free now. So, yes. We do pay for this, and we do not complain (except if they do silly "MOVE IT ALL TO THE CLOUD" proposals, or build ticket systems from hell).
Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal...
But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible...
This is a member organization. Every member has one vote, and pays the same amount of money. We're not paying for resources, we pay for membership. If you do not want to be a member, then don't. But then do not complain that you can't play with the other kids. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Member organization, who gives you unique resources for free, you to make commercial benefit! What can you do without your ASN and resources? Or how can you do your business without? By the way, this is Discussion Mailing List for Charging Scheme. It is obvious to talk here about this. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024 17:10 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Gert Doering' <gert@space.net>; 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org>; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: AW: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:03:34PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs
You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900??? yearly.
Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets.
This has a commercial benefit.
We have paid RIPE fees for over 25 years now. Maybe we have paid enough, and only the newcomers should pay now? Silly arguments can be made in all directions.
Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs..
I've been around for a while, and helped build all this, which you want for free now. So, yes. We do pay for this, and we do not complain (except if they do silly "MOVE IT ALL TO THE CLOUD" proposals, or build ticket systems from hell).
Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal...
But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible...
This is a member organization. Every member has one vote, and pays the same amount of money. We're not paying for resources, we pay for membership. If you do not want to be a member, then don't. But then do not complain that you can't play with the other kids. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Le Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:20:33PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de a écrit :
Member organization, who gives you unique resources for free, you to make commercial benefit!
What can you do without your ASN and resources? Or how can you do your business without?
You can get IP and ASN without being a member. -- Denis Fondras / Liopen

Hi, Do you think, 1000 members in waiting list, about double of them in transfer restriction period, dont know the alternatives??? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 17:25 schrieb Denis Fondras - Liopen via members-discuss <members-discuss@ripe.net>: Le Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:20:33PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de a écrit :
Member organization, who gives you unique resources for free, you to make commercial benefit!
What can you do without your ASN and resources? Or how can you do your business without?
You can get IP and ASN without being a member.
-- Denis Fondras / Liopen
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

Sorry Gert, but... It is very funny listen about 25 years payments now, then 1 IPv4 price on market now more than 20 euro. It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing! All that we need to know from https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/member-and-community-consultations/char... : IS: ----> A quick initial assessment of this scenarios shows that: 37.48% of the revenue budget would come from 25 members or 0.12% of the membership 47.35% of the revenue budget would come from 1,350 or 6.7% of the membership 15.17% of the revenue budget would come from 18,790 or 93.18% of the membership <---- So 93% NCC member pays for "good life" of 7% LIRs! Sorry, but it's looks like: "We need revolution!". ----------- Serbulov Dmitry
Member organization, who gives you unique resources for free, you to make commercial benefit!
What can you do without your ASN and resources? Or how can you do your business without?
By the way, this is Discussion Mailing List for Charging Scheme. It is obvious to talk here about this.
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS
Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland
Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de info@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024 17:10 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Gert Doering' <gert@space.net>; 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org>; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: AW: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:03:34PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs
You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900??? yearly.
Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets.
This has a commercial benefit.
We have paid RIPE fees for over 25 years now. Maybe we have paid enough, and only the newcomers should pay now?
Silly arguments can be made in all directions.
Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs..
I've been around for a while, and helped build all this, which you want for free now. So, yes. We do pay for this, and we do not complain (except if they do silly "MOVE IT ALL TO THE CLOUD" proposals, or build ticket systems from hell).
Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal...
But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible...
This is a member organization. Every member has one vote, and pays the same amount of money.
We're not paying for resources, we pay for membership.
If you do not want to be a member, then don't. But then do not complain that you can't play with the other kids.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 07:00:21PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing!
You should be very thankful to "LIRs like me" - because now you *did* get a /24, or a few, instead of "nothing". The LIRs that were here for the last 20 years limited the amount of addresses they could receive, voluntarily, by various proposals how to deal with the diminishing IPv4 address space ("run-out fairly" proposal, "last /8 allocation policy", etc.) - so *you* could still get some. Also, we've been telling the world since 25 years(!) that they should move to IPv6, because IPv4 is running out, and will be expensive at some point... so indeed, it's very annoying that so many networks out there are still v4-only, requiring us all to provide v4 to our customers. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi
Also, we've been telling the world since 25 years(!) that they should move to IPv6, because IPv4 is running out, and will be expensive at some point... so indeed, it's very annoying that so many networks out there are still v4-only, requiring us all to provide v4 to our customers.
OK! 25 years your telling - and nothing done. So now I see easy way - lets get fee for each deficit resource. If you need it - you will pay it! If not - move to IPv6 now! If it was payment 1E for each IPv4 we all already moved to IPv6. But Now YOU, and LIRs like YOU, want continue telling about what is need to do but do nothing, because you make money on this situation! Situation that YOU DONE!
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 07:00:21PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing!
You should be very thankful to "LIRs like me" - because now you *did* get a /24, or a few, instead of "nothing".
The LIRs that were here for the last 20 years limited the amount of addresses they could receive, voluntarily, by various proposals how to deal with the diminishing IPv4 address space ("run-out fairly" proposal, "last /8 allocation policy", etc.) - so *you* could still get some.
Also, we've been telling the world since 25 years(!) that they should move to IPv6, because IPv4 is running out, and will be expensive at some point... so indeed, it's very annoying that so many networks out there are still v4-only, requiring us all to provide v4 to our customers.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

OK! 25 years your telling - and nothing done.
Shut up! You are blaming people, you do not even know. You are aggressively annoying everyone, who contribute to the Internet we all know today. And that only for our small business impact? Do you really depend on 2k€ for doing your business? Do you try to tell us, that you are doing Internet commercially and can't afford a new computer? Go figure. And btw, come back, when you returned IPv4 space back to RIPE, because you did not need it anymore.

please beware os using the word "you." it tends toward ad hominem as opposed to reasonable discussion. randy

You are right, but unfortunately in english “you” and “you” have the same writing. I am sure no one would blame someone else personally. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 19:13 schrieb Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>:
please beware os using the word "you." it tends toward ad hominem as opposed to reasonable discussion.
randy
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

You are right, but unfortunately in english “you” and “you” have the same writing.
the generic is 'one' randy

Hi
On 15 May 2024, at 19:24, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 07:00:21PM +0300, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote: It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing!
You should be very thankful to "LIRs like me" - because now you *did* get a /24, or a few, instead of "nothing".
The LIRs that were here for the last 20 years limited the amount of addresses they could receive, voluntarily, by various proposals how to deal with the diminishing IPv4 address space ("run-out fairly" proposal, "last /8 allocation policy", etc.) - so *you* could still get some.
Also, we've been telling the world since 25 years(!) that they should move to IPv6, because IPv4 is running out, and will be expensive at some point... so indeed, it's very annoying that so many networks out there are still v4-only, requiring us all to provide v4 to our customers.
Sorry, but that’s terribly not true. If you read this list somewhere in the beginning of this list mess you will find many biggest holders (ISPs) saying exactly this: we are not economically interested in solving problems of enabling IPv6 or doing IPv4 renumbering (e.g. currently using /16 where /24 is sufficient). They don’t care or sometimes even worse - doing that intentionally. Exactly this networks (and not some general “world”) of 25 years ago are main reason other networks still need dual stack and hunting for any /24 they can get. If you actually succeeded in what you say - this talk would never happen. As already said: proportional fee is not about proportional/disproportional resource consumption. It’s a measurement perfectly indicating size of the company and it possibilities. As well as perfect motivator to implement IPv6 and stop (un)intentionally hurting other networks. As well as solution on how to properly finance additional things of activity plan (ATLAS, research) never needed or voted by some “new” members. As well as solution to the existing poor scheme of “sponsoring” LIRs, which is different from other RIRs. eg on ARIN small resource holder can pay small fee directly to RIR without intermediate untrustable org.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mihail%40fedorov.net <signature.asc>

Exactly that! And RIPE it is the only RIR who allowed multiLIR accounts, we can see a person/entity with more than 20 lir accounts hoarding the IPv4 space and only purpose is to lease out not using it by himself! The benefit, of course, is RIPE from signup fees, and membership fees without thinking that after 2 years they merge them into one LIR account and hold the resource. Not sure that RIPE staff was thinking of doing/allowing such a policy in which the budget for RIPE NCC was short term and not long term! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:00 PM <sdy@a-n-t.ru> wrote:
Sorry Gert, but...
It is very funny listen about 25 years payments now, then 1 IPv4 price on market now more than 20 euro.
It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing!
All that we need to know from
https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/member-and-community-consultations/char... :
IS: ----> A quick initial assessment of this scenarios shows that:
37.48% of the revenue budget would come from 25 members or 0.12% of the membership 47.35% of the revenue budget would come from 1,350 or 6.7% of the membership 15.17% of the revenue budget would come from 18,790 or 93.18% of the membership <----
So 93% NCC member pays for "good life" of 7% LIRs!
Sorry, but it's looks like: "We need revolution!".
----------- Serbulov Dmitry
Member organization, who gives you unique resources for free, you to make commercial benefit!
What can you do without your ASN and resources? Or how can you do your business without?
By the way, this is Discussion Mailing List for Charging Scheme. It is obvious to talk here about this.
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS
Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland
Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de info@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024 17:10 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Gert Doering' <gert@space.net>; 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org ; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: AW: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:03:34PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs
You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900??? yearly.
Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets.
This has a commercial benefit.
We have paid RIPE fees for over 25 years now. Maybe we have paid enough, and only the newcomers should pay now?
Silly arguments can be made in all directions.
Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs..
I've been around for a while, and helped build all this, which you want for free now. So, yes. We do pay for this, and we do not complain (except if they do silly "MOVE IT ALL TO THE CLOUD" proposals, or build ticket systems from hell).
Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal...
But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible...
This is a member organization. Every member has one vote, and pays the same amount of money.
We're not paying for resources, we pay for membership.
If you do not want to be a member, then don't. But then do not complain that you can't play with the other kids.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/sdy%40a-n-t.ru
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:23:53PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi via members-discuss wrote:
Exactly that! And RIPE it is the only RIR who allowed multiLIR accounts, we can see a person/entity with more than 20 lir accounts hoarding the IPv4 space and only purpose is to lease out not using it by himself! The benefit, of course, is RIPE from signup fees, and membership fees without thinking that after 2 years they merge them into one LIR account and hold the resource. Not sure that RIPE staff was thinking of doing/allowing such a policy in which the budget for RIPE NCC was short term and not long term!
Oh, please. This was all very well known and very well understood. It was clear that people were trying to make as much money as they could out of the last /22s given out, so we made the policy as restrictive as we could (and I've been called bad names because of that) - but it was clear as well that the NCC has one primary goal, which is "accuracy of the registry". So if the board hadn't permitted multiple LIR accounts, people would have just opened shell companies (UK Ltd can be founded for a few pounds), so they had "independent legal entities", the addresses would have been requested anyway, *and* the database accuracy would have been worse. This is all in the public archives of this list and the address policy WG list. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

On 15. 5. 24 18:00, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing!
Ever heard of that mysterious thing, called IPv6? :) Cheers, Jan

There are still IPv6 dragons … 😉 Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> im Auftrag von Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Datum: Donnerstag, 16. Mai 2024 um 14:03 An: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members On 15. 5. 24 18:00, sdy@a-n-t.ru wrote:
It was done by you and LIRs like you! To do nothing 25 years to make economic crisis model in international network addressing!
Ever heard of that mysterious thing, called IPv6? :) Cheers, Jan

Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:20:33PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
By the way, this is Discussion Mailing List for Charging Scheme. It is obvious to talk here about this.
First of all, this is the generic "ripe members" list, not "the list for charging scheme". Second, indeed, a few of you do all the *talking*, but maybe you should start *listening* for a change... The amount of time you are burning by repeating your demands, again and again, intermixed with complaints, could easily be used to finance the NCC for the next few years. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

Hi, RIPE NCC is not a Member Organisation, is a Member Organisation, who is a Regional Internet Registry (RIR) responsible for allocating and managing IP addresses and Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) for Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Central Asia.. So main part of the members are member because they need resources. Which resources? The resources, which are unique! So yes, RIRs are monopoly! RIPE NCC is monopoly, because there is no place to get the resource for the europen region. And the people as you, they are working for large resource holders, of course want them to pay for the resource they use lower… Possibly all the costs will be paid from the small LIRs. Why because you are older in the world than the others… Stone age thinking!!! Doesnt work forever… You will see, it will change! If not, there wont be a “stable future” for RIPE NCC, as our EB tells… -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 17:09 schrieb Gert Doering <gert@space.net>:
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:03:34PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote: You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs
You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900??? yearly.
Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets.
This has a commercial benefit.
We have paid RIPE fees for over 25 years now. Maybe we have paid enough, and only the newcomers should pay now?
Silly arguments can be made in all directions.
Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs..
I've been around for a while, and helped build all this, which you want for free now. So, yes. We do pay for this, and we do not complain (except if they do silly "MOVE IT ALL TO THE CLOUD" proposals, or build ticket systems from hell).
Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal...
But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible...
This is a member organization. Every member has one vote, and pays the same amount of money.
We're not paying for resources, we pay for membership.
If you do not want to be a member, then don't. But then do not complain that you can't play with the other kids.
Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279

On Wed May 15, 2024 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
So yes, RIRs are monopoly! RIPE NCC is monopoly, because there is no place to get the resource for the europen region.
I beg to differ. https://ipv4.global https://www.ipxo.com https://ipv4marketgroup.com Shall I continue? Simon

These are companies what are doing business over RIPE. They are not RIR! On 15.05.2024 17:17, Simon Lockhart wrote:
On Wed May 15, 2024 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
So yes, RIRs are monopoly! RIPE NCC is monopoly, because there is no place to get the resource for the europen region.
I beg to differ.
https://ipv4.global https://www.ipxo.com https://ipv4marketgroup.com
Shall I continue?
Simon
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor....

Simon, don't continue, i am pretty sure people/entities like me and Murat aren't offering anything there but those with 100+ of /24. And who have the loudest tone against the policy charged by resource holders! And regarding such sites, you would encour alot of issues i.e last time we got a /24 from one of such sites will not name it now, because abuses are unpredictable, we got our whole /24 withdrawal and leaved our existing customer all offline due for one customer who abused his IP/service. So go and do business with such sites if you dare. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 7:18 PM Simon Lockhart <simon@slimey.org> wrote:
So yes, RIRs are monopoly! RIPE NCC is monopoly, because there is no
On Wed May 15, 2024 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote: place to
get the resource for the europen region.
I beg to differ.
https://ipv4.global https://www.ipxo.com https://ipv4marketgroup.com
Shall I continue?
Simon
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/mentor.leniqi%40albah...

Are they RIRs? What are they doing? Are they selling reselling or leasing resources, from RIRs, or from large LIRs? In my region, what should a provider do? Manage it again on RIPE NCC, nowhere else. If lease, why should a provider rely on sort of company, if this is a common resource??? How stable is the future of them? You understand this but dont want to show us :) -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 15.05.2024 um 19:17 schrieb Simon Lockhart <simon@slimey.org>: On Wed May 15, 2024 at 07:14:04PM +0200, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
So yes, RIRs are monopoly! RIPE NCC is monopoly, because there is no place to get the resource for the europen region.
I beg to differ.
https://ipv4.global https://www.ipxo.com https://ipv4marketgroup.com
Shall I continue?
Simon

Sorry Murat, but according to your logic “RIPE NCC is monopoly” why you are not argue to IANA ?? Or even more you can try to create one more RIR with much more fair resource allocation. As I see for you RIPE with its "unfair rules" so inconvenient to obtain registry service so nothing should stop you to create more fair organization. I believe companies with 20, 25 years contribution made existence of RIPE even possible will live here. From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:14 PM To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hi, RIPE NCC is not a Member Organisation, is a Member Organisation, who is a Regional Internet Registry (RIR) responsible for allocating and managing IP addresses and Autonomous System Numbers (ASNs) for Europe, the Middle East, and parts of Central Asia.. So main part of the members are member because they need resources. Which resources? The resources, which are unique! So yes, RIRs are monopoly! RIPE NCC is monopoly, because there is no place to get the resource for the europen region. And the people as you, they are working for large resource holders, of course want them to pay for the resource they use lower… Possibly all the costs will be paid from the small LIRs. Why because you are older in the world than the others… Stone age thinking!!! Doesnt work forever… You will see, it will change! If not, there wont be a “stable future” for RIPE NCC, as our EB tells… -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de<http://www.prebits.de> m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 15.05.2024 um 17:09 schrieb Gert Doering <gert@space.net<mailto:gert@space.net>>: Hi, On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:03:34PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de<mailto:m.terzioglu@prebits.de> wrote: You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900??? yearly. Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets. This has a commercial benefit. We have paid RIPE fees for over 25 years now. Maybe we have paid enough, and only the newcomers should pay now? Silly arguments can be made in all directions. Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs.. I've been around for a while, and helped build all this, which you want for free now. So, yes. We do pay for this, and we do not complain (except if they do silly "MOVE IT ALL TO THE CLOUD" proposals, or build ticket systems from hell). Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal... But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible... This is a member organization. Every member has one vote, and pays the same amount of money. We're not paying for resources, we pay for membership. If you do not want to be a member, then don't. But then do not complain that you can't play with the other kids. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279


Конфіденційно/Confidential Dear Murat, Lats talk more, for example, about Atlas. My company doesn't use Atlas at all. How it fits to your calculations? Let's look more deep in HR, why do you think LIR with 10x /8 consume more HR resources ten LIR with 10x /24 ? Our staff doesn't participate in RIPE learning cople of year, how this counted by you? So why membership fee have to be propotional to commercial benefit (btw it is not the same as amount of IPs) ? ________________________________ От: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> от имени m.terzioglu@prebits.de <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Отправлено: среда, мая 15, 2024 6:05:12 PM Кому: 'Gert Doering' <gert@space.net> Копия: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Тема: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hello, You have: 10 x IPv4 Allocations 2 x IPv6 Allocations 2 x ASNs You will pay with the new charging scheme between 2600 - 2900€ yearly. Your 10 x IPv4 Subnets includes more than 400 x /24 IPv4 subnets. This has a commercial benefit. Than pay to our non-profit Organization, RIPE NCC, proportional as your commercial benefit from our "Internet" for community building, training, ATLAS, EB, Office, HR, etc... proportional from/for all the costs.. Using the whole Internet Resources so much as you have, but pay for that unequal... But I am sure, you think your benefit and want to pay for your resource as low as possible... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS Bochumer Str. 20 44866 Bochum Deutschland Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.prebits.de%2F&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C732edaedefe24730368e08dc74f06977%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513823120497094%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=2DMP4Ef1XruVsJ6ldnaxktNbRjTSYb4lUZAJ5FVTjME%3D&reserved=0<http://www.prebits.de/> info@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. Mai 2024 16:17 An: m.terzioglu@prebits.de Cc: 'Simon Lockhart' <simon@slimey.org>; members-discuss@ripe.net Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [comms-circle] Re: [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hi, On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:11:35PM +0200, m.terzioglu@prebits.de wrote:
Unfortunately, i don’t have budget for "Community Building"... I paid already enough for RIPE NCC...
Which is, I think, part of the problem here. The Internet works because many different companies that all compete with each other business-wise have to cooperate to "make that thing work", and this is really helped by having people to talk to, get and offer advice, and so on. Namely, a community of network folks. So, I see "community building" and "keep the governments off our backs" (by outreach, training, etc.) as fundamental pillars of the work the RIPE NCC does, for all of us. And we're happy to fund that. And no, this has nothing to do with how many resources a LIR has. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla, Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C732edaedefe24730368e08dc74f06977%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513823120505825%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=jW1qyPv94qzcTGUaAhXvVtn19HHeGTshwkb%2BEBQQHJg%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fevgeniy.brodskiy%2540kyivstar.net&data=05%7C02%7CEvgeniy.Brodskiy%40kyivstar.net%7C732edaedefe24730368e08dc74f06977%7Cf8f9bd573bba4300a6ec3b8e70a30986%7C0%7C0%7C638513823120510518%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=POXzUnjaRQxr75Fnbfp8%2FV4bj94afSwQcHtg%2BJubu4w%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/evgeniy.brodskiy%40kyivstar.net>


On 14 May 2024, at 15:27, Sebastian Wiesinger <sebastian.wiesinger@noris.de> wrote:
No it is not a large potion. There are roughly 20000 members, you’re talking about 3.5%. I know it is in vogue right now to just demand things, reality, law and facts be damned. Still:
It is not 700 in favour, it is 700 people saying it should be voted on but that does not mean that they will vote in favour of it. f

On Tue, 14 May 2024 at 15:04, Fearghas McKay <fearghas@gmail.com> wrote:
It is not 700 in favour, it is 700 people saying it should be voted on but that does not mean that they will vote in favour of it.
IBTD. It's 700 members saying the topic "no increase" shall be discussed at the GM. The agenda proposal did not contain a resolution proposal. André -- André Grüneberg, Managing Director andre.grueneberg@bcix.de +49 30 2332195 42 BCIX Management GmbH Albrechtstr. 110 12103 Berlin Germany Geschäftsführer/Managing Directors: Jens Lietzmann, André Grüneberg Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 143581 B

On 14-05-2024 13:47, Daniel Pearson wrote:
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
711 individual LIR's are of the opinion that it should be on the agenda, which does not imply that they are in favor or against the motion. regards, Jan Kuipers -- PROCOLIX BV Jan Kuipers (ma-do, 09:00-17:00)

Hi Daniel, You can see the resolution on the Charging Scheme was passed unanimously at the 174th Board Meeting. The minutes are at: https://www.ripe.net/about-us/executive-board/minutes/2024/174th-executive-b... The mail from the Board Chair explaining its reasoning was also signed by the full Board: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ncc-announce/2024-May/001713.html And on recalling the Board, Rob's message indeed points to the relevant part of the Articles of Association. The Open House for meeting the Board candidates is tomorrow and people can still sign up for that: https://www.ripe.net/membership/meetings/open-house/meet-the-may-2024-execut... And I'm glad you bring attention to the Board candidate mailing list. People can subscribe here to ask questions and have discussions with the candidates: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/ripe-ncc-mailing-lists/executive-board-... All the best, Fergal On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 2:06 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Fergal,
Thanks for that clarification, I can't help but feel like this "choice" was carefully crafted in how it has been presented to the membership base to ensure that regardless of what "choice" we make, the board is going to get what they want, which is to raise fee's and sustain an even higher budget.
It's quite obvious that a large portion of the membership is firmly against this: https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/member-proposals/1/ , as of this date, 711 individual LIR's supported a motion to maintain the old charging scheme.
We've been "told" that such a motion cannot be made by the membership and "must" come from the EB, which is highly debatable.
You now confirm that members, *regardless of their action* have no voice in the matter and *some* form of price change to the charging scheme will occur even if only a single member votes for it.
Since we're on the topic of discussions, I noticed something that was ignored previously, and I cannot seem to find in the EB meeting minutes.
Which board members voted FOR this charging scheme and which members abstained or voted against this charging scheme.
Second question, how many members need to support a proposal to recall board members and force a new election? It seems that may be the only way we will actually see any progress on this matter is to fully replace the board of directors.
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:33 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Daniel,
In that scenario, only 50 members would be voting and 950 would be abstaining from the vote. So 26 would be the target needed for a resolution to achieve a majority and pass.
The Articles of Association provide more details on how the voting works, but they do note that "Abstentions and invalid votes shall be considered as not having been cast. All votes, both valid and invalid, and all abstentions shall be recorded in the minutes."
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-818/#article-18-general-meeting-...
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 1:16 PM Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Fergal,
Would you not require a majority vote on each item for it to be adopted?
If for example, we have 1,000 members registered to vote, but 950 of them abstained from voting on the charging scheme, surely you could not in good conscious pass any of the options?
Daniel~
On 5/14/24 6:12 AM, Fergal Cunningham wrote:
Hi Clément,
The Abstain option will be there for all resolutions and for the Board election, and this will indeed be reflected in the reporting as usual.
And although the Abstains are recorded, they don't count towards the results of the vote. Only the preferential choices count towards the result. And it's worth pointing out that for the charging scheme vote, members can vote for all three options in order of preference, or they can choose just one or two options.
All the best, Fergal
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:15 AM Clement Cavadore via members-discuss < members-discuss@ripe.net> wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 13:32 +0200, Jan Zorz - Go6 wrote:
Yes, but those votes need to happen at the GM, not on the mailing list :)
Actually, I have no clue on what to vote at next GM regarding the charging scheme. None of the proposal is OK with what I would like to see.
I hope the abstain option will be taken into consideration. I wouldn't like not to vote, as my opinion won't be reflected if I simply do not vote.
Regards,
Clément Cavadore
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/ripencc-management%40...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing listmembers-discuss@ripe.nethttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

Jan,
So the real discussion shouldn't be the budget and member fees, but the activity plan - the budget needs to follow that. :)
I was trying to remind myself of this. Up until about 2011/2012, both were on the agenda at the autumn meeting. I’ve got a vague recollection that there was a desire to set the charging scheme earlier so it could make its way into budgets earlier in the year, but perhaps I’m misremembering. Cheers, Rob

Rob, On 10. 5. 24 22:46, Rob Evans wrote:
So the real discussion shouldn't be the budget and member fees, but the activity plan - the budget needs to follow that. :)
I was trying to remind myself of this. Up until about 2011/2012, both were on the agenda at the autumn meeting. I’ve got a vague recollection that there was a desire to set the charging scheme earlier so it could make its way into budgets earlier in the year, but perhaps I’m misremembering.
Well, there are two possible ways of doing it: - get the activity plan with all the projects approved and then ask for budget for it or - get the fictional budget approved and then try to retrofit all your activity in there. I think I know which one I would choose ;) Cheers, Jan

Allow me to rephrase your short but nonsensical email: I ignore the fact that there is an Activity Plan, voted on by the membership, but insist that we should have a charging scheme that doesn’t actually fund the activities in that plan, leaving the organization with a large deficit. Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:01, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members.
We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715695355000000&usg=AOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715695355000000&usg=AOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG

Hi Alex, If only the membership had been calling for RIPE to reduce it's expenditures and budget for the last two years perhaps the board would have had time to implement such cost cutting measures which wouldn't require a new charging scheme to begin with? Daniel~ On 5/7/24 9:35 AM, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Allow me to rephrase your short but nonsensical email:
I ignore the fact that there is an Activity Plan, voted on by the membership, but insist that we should have a charging scheme that doesn’t actually fund the activities in that plan, leaving the organization with a large deficit.
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:01, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members.
We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715695355000000&usg=AOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715695355000000&usg=AOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%40privatesyste...

Does the Activity Plan that the membership accepted reflect this? The Activity Plan comes first, that leads to a budget and the Charging Scheme then funds that budget. Not the other way around. Attacking the Charging Scheme instead of working on the Activity Plan is just lazy. Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:39, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Alex,
If only the membership had been calling for RIPE to reduce it's expenditures and budget for the last two years perhaps the board would have had time to implement such cost cutting measures which wouldn't require a new charging scheme to begin with?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 9:35 AM, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Allow me to rephrase your short but nonsensical email:
I ignore the fact that there is an Activity Plan, voted on by the membership, but insist that we should have a charging scheme that doesn’t actually fund the activities in that plan, leaving the organization with a large deficit.
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:01, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members.
We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715695355000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw16DLKbpTsPi_56l0c3FtIy Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715695355000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw2bcydIEY5At7kibHcx5HJp
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%2540privatesystems.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw1E7HxyvdAIlVNrpK586yy-
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw3lfRV1VhxWLoSs9tCVrFQR

Hi Alex, honest question, do you have a link to the vote where we voted for that Activity Plan? I was of the opinion that the Executive Board decides on that by themselves (after "discussion"), was I wrong about that? I also can't find that on the agenda of any GM in 2022 or 2023. Best regards, Andreas -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Alex Le Heux Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Mai 2024 16:52 An: Members-Discuss RIPE <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Does the Activity Plan that the membership accepted reflect this? The Activity Plan comes first, that leads to a budget and the Charging Scheme then funds that budget. Not the other way around. Attacking the Charging Scheme instead of working on the Activity Plan is just lazy. Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:39, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Alex,
If only the membership had been calling for RIPE to reduce it's expenditures and budget for the last two years perhaps the board would have had time to implement such cost cutting measures which wouldn't require a new charging scheme to begin with?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 9:35 AM, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Allow me to rephrase your short but nonsensical email:
I ignore the fact that there is an Activity Plan, voted on by the membership, but insist that we should have a charging scheme that doesn’t actually fund the activities in that plan, leaving the organization with a large deficit.
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:01, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members.
We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715695355000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw16DLKbpTsPi_56l0c3FtIy Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715695355000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw2bcydIEY5At7kibHcx5HJp
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%2540privatesystems.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw1E7HxyvdAIlVNrpK586yy-
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw3lfRV1VhxWLoSs9tCVrFQR
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/a.grabmueller%40quari...

Hi Andreas, My mistake, it doesn’t get voted on directly. My point still stands though: The right way to reduce the fees is to adjust the budget and the right way to adjust the budget is to adjust the Activity Plan. The board often specitically asks for input about this and there’s even an entire ncc-services working group to discuss such things. What’s happening here is something else though: Some loud folks are demanding a particular charging scheme while not having any concrete proposals about how to reduce expenses. This will just leave the RIPE NCC with a budget deficit and it is the board’s legal duty to resist such efforts. It feels similar to a five year old staming his foot and demanding an ice cream. Want to reduce membership fees? Work on an activity plan that requires a reduced budget. Anything else is silly. And as Ondrej Filip writes, the board is aware of the concerns and has plans to address these. The RIPE NCC is not a neighbourhood football club though, it’s an RIR with massive responsibilities, so these things take a bit of time. Cheers, Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 17:14, Andreas Grabmüller | QuarIt GmbH <a.grabmueller@quarit.de> wrote:
Hi Alex,
honest question, do you have a link to the vote where we voted for that Activity Plan? I was of the opinion that the Executive Board decides on that by themselves (after "discussion"), was I wrong about that? I also can't find that on the agenda of any GM in 2022 or 2023.
Best regards, Andreas
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> Im Auftrag von Alex Le Heux Gesendet: Dienstag, 7. Mai 2024 16:52 An: Members-Discuss RIPE <members-discuss@ripe.net> Betreff: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members
Does the Activity Plan that the membership accepted reflect this?
The Activity Plan comes first, that leads to a budget and the Charging Scheme then funds that budget.
Not the other way around.
Attacking the Charging Scheme instead of working on the Activity Plan is just lazy.
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:39, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Alex,
If only the membership had been calling for RIPE to reduce it's expenditures and budget for the last two years perhaps the board would have had time to implement such cost cutting measures which wouldn't require a new charging scheme to begin with?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 9:35 AM, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Allow me to rephrase your short but nonsensical email:
I ignore the fact that there is an Activity Plan, voted on by the membership, but insist that we should have a charging scheme that doesn’t actually fund the activities in that plan, leaving the organization with a large deficit.
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:01, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members.
We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.google.com/url?q%253Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss%2526source%253Dgmail-imap%2526ust%253D1715695355000000%2526usg%253DAOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw16DLKbpTsPi_56l0c3FtIy&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw15w6XP9xVXN1zlgnGQFmpY Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://www.google.com/url?q%253Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%25252540ting.com%2526source%253Dgmail-imap%2526ust%253D1715695355000000%2526usg%253DAOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw2bcydIEY5At7kibHcx5HJp&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw0UxR4-NeKyJelTUCNA6wY7
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw1kqOxHX9iycedcBXx-km9e Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%252540privatesystems.net%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1E7HxyvdAIlVNrpK586yy-&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw0BStCVzfgMQXaxskyKGyez
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw1kqOxHX9iycedcBXx-km9e Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3lfRV1VhxWLoSs9tCVrFQR&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw03jdD8KfYZIhJRGJ-8fahx
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw1I723yuzCLJMq4Tp-w5XIw Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/a.grabmueller%2540quarit.de&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw2eRN_daNeB1qCSV1D2Xdt7 _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw1I723yuzCLJMq4Tp-w5XIw Unsubscribe: https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715699723000000&usg=AOvVaw0M0fdaSPhOekJ3g7NyQJ-v

Alex Le Heux wrote on 07/05/2024 16:56:
What’s happening here is something else though: Some loud folks are demanding a particular charging scheme while not having any concrete proposals about how to reduce expenses. compounding this, many of the ideas being floated on members-discuss about charging schemes are coming up short on having a well-defined strategic basis.
The current charging scheme was introduced in 2013 on the basis of a set of recommendations put together by a member-based task force, who produced a policy document setting out strategic principles for what a charging scheme should look like. These principles were then used to build candidate charging schemes. The RIPE NCC membership was presented with options at a GM, and they voted in a flat-rate charging scheme. The vote passed by an overall majority, but there were plenty of people who voted against. Like today, some people at the time were vociferously pro- or con-, but the process to change the charging scheme was done in consultation with the membership and it was solid enough to last 11 years. Asking for reassessment after 11 years is legitimate, but just because this reassessment hasn't happened immediately, that doesn't mean that the exec board is ignoring the membership. It looks like the opposite is the case: the current scheme is the output of a membership based process; the message about changing this approach has clearly been heard; and even though the demands for a non flat-rate charging scheme run directly contrary to what the membership voted in the 2023 GM (which was used as an input for options in the 2024 budget), a commitment has been made to reassess this approach. Overall, this seems like a pretty reasonable approach for the exec board to take. I would hope, and expect, that the process to re-assess what style of charging scheme to adopt will start with a statement of principles + analysis, which would then be used to work towards concrete proposals which can then be put to a member vote. Starting out with solutions on the members-discuss mailing list is no good unless we understand what set of problems these solutions are expected to fix. Nick

What’s happening here is something else though: Some loud folks are demanding a particular charging scheme while not having any concrete proposals about how to reduce expenses.
compounding this, many of the ideas being floated on members-discuss about charging schemes are coming up short on having a well-defined strategic basis.
The current charging scheme was introduced in 2013 on the basis of a set of recommendations put together by a member-based task force, who produced a policy document setting out strategic principles for what a charging scheme should look like.
These principles were then used to build candidate charging schemes. The RIPE NCC membership was presented with options at a GM, and they voted in a flat-rate charging scheme. The vote passed by an overall majority, but there were plenty of people who voted against.
Like today, some people at the time were vociferously pro- or con-, but the process to change the charging scheme was done in consultation with the membership and it was solid enough to last 11 years.
Asking for reassessment after 11 years is legitimate, but just because this reassessment hasn't happened immediately, that doesn't mean that the exec board is ignoring the membership. It looks like the opposite is the case: the current scheme is the output of a membership based process; the message about changing this approach has clearly been heard; and even though the demands for a non flat-rate charging scheme run directly contrary to what the membership voted in the 2023 GM (which was used as an input for options in the 2024 budget), a commitment has been made to reassess this approach. Overall, this seems like a pretty reasonable approach for the exec board to take.
I would hope, and expect, that the process to re-assess what style of charging scheme to adopt will start with a statement of principles + analysis, which would then be used to work towards concrete proposals which can then be put to a member vote. Starting out with solutions on the members-discuss mailing list is no good unless we understand what set of problems these solutions are expected to fix.
"so say we all." well, some of us :) do you suggest the task force based approach again? randy

On 7 May 2024, at 20:42, Nick Hilliard <nick@netability.ie> wrote: ... Asking for reassessment after 11 years is legitimate, but just because this reassessment hasn't happened immediately, that doesn't mean that the exec board is ignoring the membership. It looks like the opposite is the case: the current scheme is the output of a membership based process; the message about changing this approach has clearly been heard; and even though the demands for a non flat-rate charging scheme run directly contrary to what the membership voted in the 2023 GM (which was used as an input for options in the 2024 budget), a commitment has been made to reassess this approach. Overall, this seems like a pretty reasonable approach for the exec board to take.
I would hope, and expect, that the process to re-assess what style of charging scheme to adopt will start with a statement of principles + analysis, which would then be used to work towards concrete proposals which can then be put to a member vote. Starting out with solutions on the members-discuss mailing list is no good unless we understand what set of problems these solutions are expected to fix.
Very much this, thanks Nick. Rob

On 07/05/2024 18:56, Alex Le Heux wrote:
The right way to reduce the fees is to adjust the budget and the right way to adjust the budget is to adjust the Activity Plan. The board often specitically asks for input about this and there’s even an entire ncc-services working group to discuss such things.
What’s happening here is something else though: Some loud folks are demanding a particular charging scheme while not having any concrete proposals about how to reduce expenses. This will just leave the RIPE NCC with a budget deficit and it is the board’s legal duty to resist such efforts.
It feels similar to a five year old staming his foot and demanding an ice cream.
Want to reduce membership fees?
Work on an activity plan that requires a reduced budget.
Anything else is silly.
And as Ondrej Filip writes, the board is aware of the concerns and has plans to address these. The RIPE NCC is not a neighbourhood football club though, it’s an RIR with massive responsibilities, so these things take a bit of time.
Cheers,
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
+1. So true. Want to reduce fees? We need to have a reduced activity plan. I would hope the board polls the membership in regards to a reduced activity plan. -Hank

I would hope the board polls the membership in regards to a reduced activity plan.
they do. every year. randy

Hi, Slight nitpick - there isn't a formal process (or anything) for the membership to accept the Activity Plan. We get the draft as a courtesy only. Yes, one can submit comments through various channels which the EB (an by extension the Management Team, etc.) can/will/won't act on or take into consideration. Another nitpick is that before the Activity Plan, there is a Strategy document (someone might call this a five year plan) which is is what guides "everything". I do not believe the membership voted on the Strategy either. It is also a convenient thing to refer to when there are disagreements on the direction, I have seen it flying around here a few times on members-discuss both last year and now. That is not to say that the membership should vote on such documents but I find it problematic that many things are seemingly railroaded and it is impossible to stop or slow down the train. I think it is important to remember that RIPE exists for the membership, not vice versa. Stating that plan -> budget -> scheme is a done deal makes me always think many think the opposite. Kaj ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Alex Le Heux <aleheux@ting.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 17:52 To: Members-Discuss RIPE <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members [You don't often get email from aleheux@ting.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ] Does the Activity Plan that the membership accepted reflect this? The Activity Plan comes first, that leads to a budget and the Charging Scheme then funds that budget. Not the other way around. Attacking the Charging Scheme instead of working on the Activity Plan is just lazy. Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:39, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Hi Alex,
If only the membership had been calling for RIPE to reduce it's expenditures and budget for the last two years perhaps the board would have had time to implement such cost cutting measures which wouldn't require a new charging scheme to begin with?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 9:35 AM, Alex Le Heux wrote:
Allow me to rephrase your short but nonsensical email:
I ignore the fact that there is an Activity Plan, voted on by the membership, but insist that we should have a charging scheme that doesn’t actually fund the activities in that plan, leaving the organization with a large deficit.
Alex Le Heux Network Architect Tucows Inc / Ting Fiber aleheux@tucowsinc.com
On 7 May 2024, at 16:01, Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> wrote:
Please allow me to summarize this long email.
"We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do what we want to do".
Since they will not listen to the proposal voted upon, I move that we as a membership recall all standing board members and hold new elections for all seats. It is clear that the board is NOT listening to it's members.
We can certainty do that with a proposal can we not Ondřej?
Daniel~
On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting to discuss the input we received from members regarding the Board proposal for the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme 2025. We will publish the minutes as soon as possible, but I want to first give you a summary of the discussions and the outcomes from the meeting.
Since we started engaging with the membership on the charging scheme this year, we have received over 400 emails on the topic. For the first time, we also have a member proposal for a GM agenda topic that has received the required number of expressions of support to be added to the GM agenda. Therefore, we felt it was important for the Board to have this extra meeting, review the various points that were brought forward, and consider the next steps in this process. There were many important points to discuss at this meeting, and although the outcome might not please everyone, the Board was fully aligned on how it should move forward.
First, we considered again what we had decided upon at the Board meeting in March. The Board consciously did not put forward a proposal to keep the charging scheme as it is because we don’t believe that it would be good governance to make a proposal that leaves us with a large deficit, and good governance is what is expected from us by the members who elect us.
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk, and while the Board represents the members, it also has legal and fiduciary responsibilities towards the organisation. It is clear that one of the main responsibilities of the Board is to propose a charging scheme that will properly fund the association, and the charging scheme options we put forward will do that for 2025 and 2026. So we will put forward the three options as proposed on 24 April 2024 for members to vote on at the GM[1].
There were many proposals to provide that funding in alternative ways. However, we believe that this is not the right time to make fundamental changes to the charging model. We are about to embark on a full review of the organisation and its structures, and that will take some time. For us to implement that review and any resulting actions, we need stable funding. All three of the proposed options offer us this. We also note that the redistribution mechanism allows us to return any surplus made to the membership in the following year should members vote to do so. The Board and the Managing Director will also continue to work to improve efficiency and identify areas for cost savings.
We did consider moving this vote to later in the year, but this would negatively impact our planning for 2025, and it would also distract from the very important discussions we need to have with members during the Activity Plan and Budget process this Autumn. During that discussion, we do expect that the members who are convinced that the RIPE NCC needs to reduce its budget will tell us which services need to be reduced or cut in order to accommodate such a reduction.
At our meeting, the Board also discussed the structural review that will take place. This will begin at the RIPE 88 Meeting in two weeks with a BoF on how to build a stable future for the RIPE NCC. We expect that there will be a productive discussion on many issues that need to be resolved so that the RIPE NCC can move forward stably and with a funding model that has the support of its membership. We will keep the membership updated on the outcomes of those discussions and how the members can contribute to the work that will surely emerge from them.
Regarding the membership proposal[2], we acknowledge that the threshold was met to add the GM agenda topic “Keep current billing scheme for the next year”. We will add this as a topic to the agenda as required by the Articles of Association. However, this will not be added as a proposed resolution for members to vote on. Articles 15.4, 15.5 and 15.6 of the RIPE NCC Articles of Association do not allow members to propose a Charging Scheme, as reaffirmed by the external law firm that gives us expert advice on Dutch corporate law.
This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board, who have better insight into the financials and the operations of the organisation, and who have a duty of care for the well-being of the organisation and are liable in case of mismanagement. Parties without such insight, responsibility and liability may not put forward charging schemes for voting that - although appealing for individual members - may be inappropriate for the sustainability of the organisation.
To summarise, the Board recognises the member sentiment and we are committed to addressing it for the long term. However, we must do what we believe is best for the stability of the organisation and its membership, even if it is not an easy or popular thing to do. This is what is required of us when we legally commit to be Board members, and we will faithfully execute on our commitments in this regard.
We listen to your feedback and ideas, and on behalf of the Board I thank you for engaging in these important discussions and look forward to seeing them continue as we work towards a sustainable outcome for the RIPE NCC.
The RIPE NCC Executive Board
Ondřej Filip, Chair Raymond Jetten, Treasurer Piotr Strzyżewski, Secretary Maria Häll, Member Remco van Mook, Member Job Snijders, Member Harald A. Summa, Member
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%253Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%2526source%253Dgmail-imap%2526ust%253D1715695355000000%2526usg%253DAOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw16DLKbpTsPi_56l0c3FtIy&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630686393%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=ZdWbza1uEjT9M%2FSmgq5BCGeqsF9QwN1JE7CdpZFc3ig%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715695355000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw2ygAsTFfF-UcRSLE6Hvbxa&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw16DLKbpTsPi_56l0c3FtIy> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%253Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Faleheux%25252540ting.com%2526source%253Dgmail-imap%2526ust%253D1715695355000000%2526usg%253DAOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw2bcydIEY5At7kibHcx5HJp&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630691399%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nf0r61KcLY9jR51Y64rWf7hytFyxvt22S%2F5CHVRCMlI%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.google.com/url?q%3Dhttps://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715695355000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw067xu9sj889hjrbFPIJNGG&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw2bcydIEY5At7kibHcx5HJp>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630695917%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=lkFhTIO1RFWFR4YCK%2Flr%2BbLDdEBGnh%2BvOfg57NYJmmQ%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fdaniel%252540privatesystems.net%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw1E7HxyvdAIlVNrpK586yy-&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630699993%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PbM%2BkewURoCsjqWrGvvAggRueJdu7wIRH7xBrAeny0w%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/daniel%2540privatesystems.net&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw1E7HxyvdAIlVNrpK586yy->
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630704031%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NuxDjHgxCE%2FRSMY0AfgJmKZnan1miHhS7UVYYQ0aTow%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw38vHZAjr17I0Cwm3n6O7zO> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2Furl%3Fq%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Faleheux%252540ting.com%26source%3Dgmail-imap%26ust%3D1715697644000000%26usg%3DAOvVaw3lfRV1VhxWLoSs9tCVrFQR&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630708073%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=qy5fxchnMiAtEV9vnwONW8AdJEtZ%2Fmr5PtQ%2FS5sVTGE%3D&reserved=0<https://www.google.com/url?q=https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/aleheux%2540ting.com&source=gmail-imap&ust=1715697644000000&usg=AOvVaw3lfRV1VhxWLoSs9tCVrFQR>
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fmembers-discuss&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630712307%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=tSr4gyrXvx%2FoyP%2FjPBSwbFvnVyflJk%2BcMUq5iLflamM%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss> Unsubscribe: https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.ripe.net%2Fmailman%2Foptions%2Fmembers-discuss%2Fkajtzu%2540basen.net&data=05%7C02%7C%7Cc3b138e065c943b884a708dc6ea557a5%7Cd0b71c570f9b4acc923b81d0b26b55b3%7C0%7C0%7C638506903630716238%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C4000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=WWJR0lRSlXJkcIFhjmD8mBKsT8gmU3%2BW37IggUi0384%3D&reserved=0<https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/kajtzu%40basen.net>

Hi ALL!!! I propose a compromise solution to the problem that has happened. I propose to add, instead of the option with fixing "as it was", a payment scheme option with a fixed part of the payment of about 700 euros and a variable part with a flat payment scale for IPv4 and AS32. At the same time, it is necessary to calculate the amount of planned variable payments with a surplus of 10% of the planed budget in case one of the large owners of the resource refuses them. This will remove the claims of the majority of NCC participants and make our contribution payment policy reasonable. -------- Serbulov Dmitry Alpha Net Telecom ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

Hi, the EB dont want sort of charging scheme because they are scared, so that the BIG players would move to the other RIRs… -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 07.05.2024 um 18:22 schrieb sdy@a-n-t.ru:
Hi ALL!!!
I propose a compromise solution to the problem that has happened.
I propose to add, instead of the option with fixing "as it was", a payment scheme option with a fixed part of the payment of about 700 euros and a variable part with a flat payment scale for IPv4 and AS32.
At the same time, it is necessary to calculate the amount of planned variable payments with a surplus of 10% of the planed budget in case one of the large owners of the resource refuses them.
This will remove the claims of the majority of NCC participants and make our contribution payment policy reasonable.
-------- Serbulov Dmitry Alpha Net Telecom
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

I do not think that is really a problem as you cannot "RIR shop". There are more disadvantages than advantages with changing RIRs [and having large amounts of addresses] unless you have a Really Good Idea, for example, to consolidate assets in some jurisdiction. But then you do not really care about whether it is 1200 or 1400 or 1800 or 3500 that you're paying, you have a much bigger picture. The thing is that if you pay more you tend to expect on getting more. Price and perceived value tend to correlate to some (often large) degree. Kaj ________________________________ From: Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS <m.terzioglu@prebits.de> Sent: Tuesday, May 7, 2024 19:25 To: sdy@a-n-t.ru <sdy@a-n-t.ru> Cc: Kaj Niemi <kajtzu@basen.net>; Members-Discuss RIPE <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] Executive Board Meeting to Discuss Charging Scheme Input from Members Hi, the EB dont want sort of charging scheme because they are scared, so that the BIG players would move to the other RIRs… -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995 www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de USt-ID: DE315418902 Am 07.05.2024 um 18:22 schrieb sdy@a-n-t.ru: Hi ALL!!! I propose a compromise solution to the problem that has happened. I propose to add, instead of the option with fixing "as it was", a payment scheme option with a fixed part of the payment of about 700 euros and a variable part with a flat payment scale for IPv4 and AS32. At the same time, it is necessary to calculate the amount of planned variable payments with a surplus of 10% of the planed budget in case one of the large owners of the resource refuses them. This will remove the claims of the majority of NCC participants and make our contribution payment policy reasonable. -------- Serbulov Dmitry Alpha Net Telecom ----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...

Hi! BIG players who pay 2000 euro? No problem, give them to moving to another RIR saving IPv4 in RIPE - someone else will take it and will pay. If someone think 10% percent of budget proficit is not enough for compensate 'want moving' - OK! Let's do it 20%!
Hi,
the EB dont want sort of charging scheme because they are scared, so that the BIG players would move to the other RIRs…
-- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
Murat TERZIOGLU PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions
Bochumer Str. 20 D-44866 Bochum
Telefon: 0234/58825994 Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de m.terzioglu@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 07.05.2024 um 18:22 schrieb sdy@a-n-t.ru:
Hi ALL!!!
I propose a compromise solution to the problem that has happened.
I propose to add, instead of the option with fixing "as it was", a payment scheme option with a fixed part of the payment of about 700 euros and a variable part with a flat payment scale for IPv4 and AS32.
At the same time, it is necessary to calculate the amount of planned variable payments with a surplus of 10% of the planed budget in case one of the large owners of the resource refuses them.
This will remove the claims of the majority of NCC participants and make our contribution payment policy reasonable.
-------- Serbulov Dmitry Alpha Net Telecom
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.

They scared because they work in BIG players :) And they can (in theory) being kicked off from this BIG players after changing charging scheme. On 07.05.2024 16:25, Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS wrote:
Hi,
the EB dont want sort of charging scheme because they are scared, so that the BIG players would move to the other RIRs…
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best Regards
*Murat TERZIOGLU* *PREBITS - Premium Business IT Solutions*
Bochumer Str. 20
D-44866 Bochum
Telefon: 0234/58825994
Telefax: 0234/58825995
www.prebits.de
m.terzioglu@prebits.de
USt-ID: DE315418902
Am 07.05.2024 um 18:22 schrieb sdy@a-n-t.ru:
Hi ALL!!!
I propose a compromise solution to the problem that has happened.
I propose to add, instead of the option with fixing "as it was", a payment scheme option with a fixed part of the payment of about 700 euros and a variable part with a flat payment scale for IPv4 and AS32.
At the same time, it is necessary to calculate the amount of planned variable payments with a surplus of 10% of the planed budget in case one of the large owners of the resource refuses them.
This will remove the claims of the majority of NCC participants and make our contribution payment policy reasonable.
-------- Serbulov Dmitry Alpha Net Telecom
----------------------------- С уважением Сербулов Дмитрий ООО "Альфа Нет Телеком" +7(498)785-8-000 раб. +7(495)940-92-11 доп. +7(925)518-10-69 сот.
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/m.terzioglu%40prebits...
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/admin%40roskomnadzor....

Dear Board, On 5/7/24 8:54 AM, Ondřej Filip wrote:
Dear members,
On 6 May, 2024, the Executive Board held a meeting
[…]
Furthermore, some of the suggestions from members would change the funding model in a way that would put the organisation at risk
[…] Please explain which of the suggestions were putting the organization at risk and how. I’d like to hear about the risks the Board has evaluated. Has the board done any analysis on why it still considers it fair for the PI cost to be €50/year since 2011? A €200/year/block would bring the NCC budget €4mil.. Has the Board ever evaluated if a base fee + a %of IPv4 fee + a %of IPv6 fee + a services (tickets, training, meetings) approach would satisfy more of the membership? Was the resource based charging scheme with emphasis on IPv4 holdings so bad? Is there a risk to the RIPE NCC if a member pays a larger bill? Did the holders of the large blocks really threaten to leave the RIPE NCC service region or is this just a hypothetical situation? How would one large holder of IPv4 addresses leaving really cause such a big risk to the organization ? Wouldn’t their bill be redistributed to all other members? Guess a lot of these questions will find answers during the BoF. Wish remote attendance will be available. Elvis
participants (45)
-
Adam
-
AlbaHost SH.P.K
-
Alex Le Heux
-
Alexander Leefmann
-
Andreas Grabmüller | QuarIt GmbH
-
Andreas Schmieja
-
André Grüneberg
-
Claudius Zingerli
-
Clement Cavadore
-
Daniel Pearson
-
Daniel Suchy
-
David Ponzone
-
Denis Fondras - Liopen
-
Elvis Daniel Velea
-
Evgeniy Brodskiy
-
Fearghas Mckay
-
Fearghas McKay
-
Fergal Cunningham
-
Gert Doering
-
Hank Nussbacher
-
Jan Kuipers
-
Jan Zorz - Go6
-
Kai Siering
-
Kaj Niemi
-
Lutz Donnerhacke
-
m.terzioglu@prebits.de
-
Martin Millnert
-
Mentor Leniqi
-
Michel Lanners
-
Michele Neylon - Blacknight
-
Mihail Fedorov
-
Murat Terzioglu | PREBITS
-
Nick Hilliard
-
Niels Dettenbach
-
Randy Bush
-
Rob Evans
-
ROSKOMNADZOR LIMITED
-
sdy@a-n-t.ru
-
Sebastian Wiesinger
-
Sebastian-Becker@telekom.de
-
Sebastian-Wilhelm Graf
-
Sebastien Brossier
-
Servperso
-
Simon Lockhart
-
Łukasz Jarosz