"Members voted" members like you, not the opposite. Oh and btw:

I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should
pay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like,
because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or
something else).

"you" builded whole thing and of course most likely and its crystal clear that you benefited from this. If you really would care too much about this build that "you" did for "us" to grant that much from your "build" be fair and accept the reality and implement a policy like other RIRs based on resource holder! Why are you so strongly against this if "you" builded for us?!

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:36 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

Hi,

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:31:41PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
> Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs
> do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting
> too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members
> too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it?

That's back to "I want everyone else to pay more, and I want to pay less".

I want the same thing, but of course *we* should pay less, and *you* should
pay more. And I can find lots of arguments why this is more fair (like,
because we build this whole thing that you can now take for granted, or
something else).

So, a reasonable compromise seems to be "all members pay the same", and
this is what members vote for, multiple times.

Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279