Heh, i would'n post that much if the policy was fair just like other RIRs do charge based on resource. Let's be honest, if you agreed that posting too much should be charged more, i totally agree and a lot of other members too, holding more resources should pay more. Very simple isn't it?
Hi,
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:20:05PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
> I believe RIPE it is the only RIR who charges its members the same
> amount no matter the resource holder! Other RIRs like APNIC and many other
> RIRs:
> https://www.apnic.net/get-ip/apnic-membership/how-much-does-it-cost/member-fees-calculator/
> have a great and fair solution about resource holders.
Again that funny argument that this would be "more fair". I could argue
that you should be charged more, because you are posting so much to the
ripe-members list, which costs lots of time. Wouldn't that be "more fair"?
> If you believe that only you and or RIPE is right then tell other RIRs
> should be sued!
I do not need to sue anyone. The members have voted last year that they
did not want the category scheme proposed. Very easy.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279