Hello, 
It seems so. I had the same feeling of being ignored when I asked if equalizing status of every resource holder (PI, PA, legacy) was viable solution for stabilizing income. 

Best regards,
Łukasz Jarosz

wt., 7 maj 2024, 16:15 użytkownik Daniel Pearson <daniel@privatesystems.net> napisał:
Based on their response, it seems we have no choice but to replace the
board?

"This legal framework ensures that a Charging Scheme may only be
proposed by those who were elected to serve on the Executive Board...."

They just don't want to listen to us.

On 5/7/24 9:08 AM, Clement Cavadore wrote:
> On Tue, 2024-05-07 at 09:01 -0500, Daniel Pearson wrote:
>> Please allow me to summarize this long email.
>>
>> "We hear you members, but we disagree, so we are still going to do
>> what we want to do".
> That's a very realistic tl;dr from Ondřej's mail. And I am still
> completely disappointed in what RIPE NCC and its board are doing.
>
> "You have the right to disagree, but still, we don't care, and we'll
> move on with what we decided, even if we are sitting on a big financial
> reserve which could offer us some time to find better solutions"
>


_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/lukasz%40jarosz.pl