You don't really care about arguments, the same you did with charging model like other RIRs, and you argued that because of this model alot of LIRs from other RIRs moved to ripe, while i wondered how much you pointed out go and find yourself, i found it and provided to you. Which it was the opposite of what you've said.
It has nothing to do with personal attack, it has to do with because you are instructing other LIR members for as per your words "over 25 years" to implement IPv6, but you didn't implemented for over 25 years guess how much 1.6%!

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:23 PM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:54:28PM +0200, Mentor Leniqi wrote:
> This:
>
> -have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? I won't but you should.

Not today, actually, as I've not done anything useful today, just argued
on mailing lists.  But over the last few days, yes, quite a few machines
with v6 (including a very stubborn OpenIndiana 2024 system which needs
extra guidance to make v6 config persistent).

That you are resorting to personal attacks now, after being asked to
explain your measurement methodology, is answer enough, though.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Ingo Lalla,
                                           Karin Schuler, Sebastian Cler
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279