- members-discuss - mailman.ripe.net

Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [news] Board Resolution to Suspend Creation of Multiple LIR Accounts
by Hank Nussbacher 19 Nov '15

19 Nov '15

At 12:39 19/11/2015 +0200, Nigel Titley wrote: Took 7 years: https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/2008-December/003… Now lets see how they solve the problem. -Hank >Dear colleagues, > >On 18 November 2015, the RIPE NCC Executive Board held a Board Meeting >in which it made a resolution to temporarily restrict the ability of >RIPE NCC members to acquire additional LIR accounts. The resolution also >temporarily suspends existing, ongoing or pending requests of RIPE NCC >members to open additional LIR accounts. > >The draft minutes of the 103rd Executive Board Meeting, in which the >resolution was drafted, are now available: >https://www.ripe.net/about-us/executive-board/minutes/2015/minutes-103rd-ex… > >The board made the resolution following discussion at the RIPE NCC >General Meeting (GM), where a participant pointed out that the ability >for a member to create multiple LIR accounts might not be in accordance >with RIPE policy. The board resolution comes into immediate effect in >order to prevent members rapidly accruing LIR accounts in light of the >GM discussions. > >The resolution does not include the acquisition of additional LIR >accounts due to changes in two RIPE NCC members' business structures >(e.g. merger or acquisition between two organisations that are RIPE NCC >members). > >For the next GM, the board plans to add an agenda item on this topic for >deliberation and will put forward a formal resolution for the members to >vote on. > >The board may revisit its decision on this matter at any time in >accordance with the discussions, and no later than at the first >Executive Board Meeting after the next General Meeting. > >The board would like the membership to discuss this matter on the ><members-discuss(a)ripe.net> mailing list. You can also contact the board >directly at <exec-board(a)ripe.net>. > >Best regards, > >Nigel Titley >RIPE NCC Executive Board Chairman

2 1

IETF funding from RIPE
by Roger Jørgensen 19 Nov '15

19 Nov '15

Dear execboard, Yes please set up a longterm support plan so IETF can get a predictable funding source. -- Roger Jorgensen | ROJO9-RIPE rogerj(a)gmail.com | - IPv6 is The Key! http://www.jorgensen.no | roger(a)jorgensen.no

2 1

Re: [members-discuss] scanned document (3127743)
by Henry Spanka 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Hey, Why are you sending a message with almost to content including a binary .exe file? Isn’t this against the RIPE NCC rules and could take some NCC members at risk in case it’s a virus or something. Definitely really suspiciously although I think, that it was an accident. Best regards Henry Spanka | myVirtualserver Development Team Von: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Info BusinessCom Gesendet: Friday, October 16, 2015 1:28 PM An: 'j.vaandrager(a)verkerk.com' <j.vaandrager(a)verkerk.com>; 'm.vanvuuren(a)verkerk.com' <m.vanvuuren(a)verkerk.com>; 'db-wg(a)ripe.net' <db-wg(a)ripe.net>; 'members-discuss(a)ripe.net' <members-discuss(a)ripe.net>; 'ncc-announce(a)ripe.net' <ncc-announce(a)ripe.net> Betreff: [members-discuss] scanned document (3127743) Scanner model: HP Scanner software version: 61212-418703 Scanner file name: Covered unfair resample

4 3

scanned document (3127743)
by Info BusinessCom 16 Oct '15

16 Oct '15

Scanner model: HP Scanner software version: 61212-418703 Scanner file name: Covered unfair resample

1 0

Promote the use of IRC
by Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) 07 Sep '15

07 Sep '15

Hi all, Im wondering what do you guys think about the use of IRC instead of mailing list for some quick discussions, chit chat, etc... RIPE already have a unique IRC server, but I'm sure lot of us could host irc servers and irc services (as nickname registrarion, channels, etc.) The IRC could also be a good way to learn about how RIPE works in all of their WG, and I think is a good way to know better each other, have a really good BCOP communication. I'm relatively new to RIPE and maybe this question was answered before, but I didnt found anything searching for "IRC" or "Chat". For sure, I could host and irc server and/or irc services. I worked with them before. As a note, we could see the posibility to be authenticated on IRC based on our RIPE login. Also, channel logs (for logging history) can be publicly available as html. What do you think? I'm crazy? Regards, --Daniel PD: Very sorry for my english :)

8 8

Re: [members-discuss] Promote the use of IRC
by Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) 11 Aug '15

11 Aug '15

Hi, The 11/08/2015 a las 13:38, Gunnar Guðvarðarson wrote: > Hey, > > Why not use a public service such as Freenode for such purpose? Ripe already have a single irc server, we can build the network from that. The 11/08/2015 a las 13:42, Varasdy Imre Csaba wrote: >i think this is good idea to have a place for chit-chat, quick >discussion, community based help-channel. >But i'm not sure, if IRC is the best way for this. >(for example, if your client was disconnected/turned off you cannot >track back the conversation) For that I said to have a "bot" to track all public channels (or the ones we want) and save the log to html to have publicly available, so you dont miss the conversations. Regards, --Daniel

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] Promote the use of IRC
by Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) 11 Aug '15

11 Aug '15

Helli Michael, > Ripe does have a IRC server used for meetings and discussions, but it would be good to have a social channel there for all ripe partners and people working with ripe to connect and discuss in. > > Its on irc.ripe.net. Yes, i know, I try to follow meetings on the IRC. Its a single server with no services (nickname, channel registration, etc). If we can get a good IRC network (with few servers linked to a hub server (the ripe one, for example) and a good services (for not to be supplanted) I think it can work. > I agree though it would be good to have general IRC rooms for those of us wishing to chat instead of using a mailing list. Mailing list should be used for what they are meant, but there are a lot of discussions, chit chat, etc... that can be done in IRC and then embodied (<-- not sure if is the correct word) on the Mailing List as "official". > > Kind regards, Regards,

2 1

Discussion on LIRs from Donetsk Area
by Axel Pawlik 01 Jul '15

01 Jul '15

Dear colleagues, To clarify matters relating to the discussion on LIRs from the Donetsk area, I would like to remind you of the RIPE NCC Executive Board's resolution on continuity to service to all members. Please see the statement at: https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/about-ripe-ncc-and-ripe/executive-bo… The RIPE NCC needs to confirm that an entity exists. Dutch law does not restrict the RIPE NCC from using any means it finds appropriate as proof that a legal entity exists. Documents issued by any national authority are considered to be sufficient proof. The RIPE NCC can neither recognise nor deny one state’s authority over a region. Given the situation, the RIPE NCC is striving to facilitate the provision of its services to network operators in this area and does not wish to deny services for political reasons. Our priority remains the provision of services to all our members. kind regards, Axel Pawlik Managing Director RIPE NCC

7 7

Re: [members-discuss] Discussion on LIRs from Donetsk Area
by Samorukov,Alexey 30 Jun '15

30 Jun '15

I am aware of situation were RIPE NCC made registrations based on fake/spoofed documentation. This is the reason why i asked RIPE NCC representatives to check it because it "looks like a Friday joke” (c). I am aware that RIPE NCC members may not be aware about belonging of Donetsk and Lugansk cities or did very relaxed check of the submitted document. Thats it. > > After reading the entire discussion, it seems that it is political debates about territory on which this ORG object was registered. RIPE NCC does not register LIR without documents. Dot. >

2 1

Re: [members-discuss] Discussion on LIRs from Donetsk Area
by Samorukov,Alexey 30 Jun '15

30 Jun '15

> > To clarify matters relating to the discussion on LIRs from the Donetsk > area, I would like to remind you of the RIPE NCC Executive Board's > resolution on continuity to service to all members. Please see the > statement at: > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/about-ripe-ncc-and-ripe/executive-bo… <https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/about-ripe-ncc-and-ripe/executive-bo…> > > The RIPE NCC needs to confirm that an entity exists. Dutch law does not > restrict the RIPE NCC from using any means it finds appropriate as proof > that a legal entity exists. Documents issued by any national authority > are considered to be sufficient proof. Thank you for reply, it would be great to have some clarifications, if possible. Does it mean that organization "Center of Internet services in DNR” is exists in Russia? I cant find any references to it in the registries. Also it is not clear what is “national authority” here. Admin-c and tech-c numbers are with Ukrainian prefix. Lugansk is Ukrainian city. DNR itself is a terroristic organization which is located in the Donetsk area (not Lugansk, btw). Could you please check and confirm that all documents were checked properly? Thank you.

6 11