- members-discuss - mailman.ripe.net

Re: Does anyone have experience with the seizure of IP addresses at RIPE?
by Lars Grønlund 25 Aug '25

25 Aug '25

Thread: https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss@ripe.net/thread/RSMA… Hi Thomas, There is precedent in national courts treating IP addresses as attachable assets (e.g. *Amtsgericht Hamburg, case 67a M 93/19*, and *OLG Wien, case 3 R 195/14y*). The difficulty is that RIPE NCC, under Dutch law, considers them contractual “rights of use” and will only act on a *Dutch court order*. In practice, creditors either secure a voluntary transfer from the debtor or go through proceedings in the Netherlands. Without that, RIPE will not execute a garnishment. Best regards, *Lars Grønlund* GITC ApS · www.gitc.dk

1 0

Re: Does anyone have experience with the seizure of IP addressesat RIPE?
by Jørgen Hovland ☁️ 25 Aug '25

25 Aug '25

1 0

Final Report from the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Task Force
by Peter Hessler 14 Jul '25

14 Jul '25

Dear all, On behalf of the RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Task Force, I am delighted to share our final report, which outlines the principles intended to guide the development of a new charging scheme model for the RIPE NCC. You can read the final report at: https://www.ripe.net/s/charging-scheme-task-force-2024/final-report/ Over the course of just under a year, the task force met 18 times to explore a wide range of issues related to how the RIPE NCC could charge its members. These discussions involved disagreements and compromises, but ultimately we reached consensus on the principles presented in this report. The work of the task force, including the minutes from these meetings, is available at: https://www.ripe.net/s/charging-scheme-task-force-2024/ Thank you to everyone who contributed to this process, including all members of the task force and members who provided feedback. Best regards, Peter Hessler Co-Chair, RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Task Force

6 7

RIPE NCC Quarterly Planning Q3 2025
by Boris Duval 25 Jun '25

25 Jun '25

Dear colleagues, We have now published the upcoming quarterly plans for our development teams: https://www.ripe.net/quarterly-planning We publish these plans each quarter to showcase the work items we will be carrying out over the next months. We welcome your feedback and encourage you to suggest items that the RIPE NCC should be working on going forward. The plans cover the following areas: - RIPE Database - Business Applications, including the LIR Portal, Registry Services and other applications. - DNS and K-root - RIPE Atlas - RIPEstat - Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) - Routing Information Service (RIS) - Information Security, Risk, and Compliance - Training and Certification If you have any questions or input on these plans, please share your suggestions on this list or the RIPE NCC Forum: https://forum.ripe.net/ Kind regards, Boris Duval Communications Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Charging Scheme Task Force Meeting Minutes Published
by Karla Liddle-White 12 Jun '25

12 Jun '25

Dear all, The minutes from the latest RIPE NCC Charging Scheme Task Force meetings are available, including those from meetings 11, 12 and 13. You can find the published minutes at: https://www.ripe.net/s/charging-scheme-task-force-2024/ The task force welcomes comments on the minutes, either on the list here or you can email them directly at: charging-scheme-task-force2024(a)ripe.net Best regards, Karla Liddle-White Senior Communications Officer RIPE NCC

1 0

Re: Reminder that Charging Scheme Task Force comments are open until the end of the month
by D. Walde - Walde IT-Systemhaus 10 Jun '25

10 Jun '25

IPv6 is cheaper to implement, but the transition is a curse for admins. They don't understand it, because they only know 255. Companies should clean up their IPv4 networks. Fees should be fairer for members. We have costs that are rising with the maturity. Yes, perhaps a red line should be applied there. But we're all clear on this point, only because there is a membership charter, and it's not exactly fair. We need to come up with a new fee structure that is fair to all members. -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Walde IT-Systemhaus - CEO Dirk Walde - IT-Specialist

29 112

Members-Discuss Mailing List Placed Under Moderation
by Hans Petter Holen 03 Jun '25

03 Jun '25

Dear members, In light of recent activity on the members-discuss mailing list, the Executive Board resolved to place the members-discuss mailing list in moderation until further notice. This follows numerous complaints that have been made about mails that are off-topic and/or contain material that does not show tolerance or respect for fellow members of the list. The resolution is: “The RIPE NCC Executive Board resolves to temporarily moderate the members-discuss mailing list starting from Monday 2 June 2025, 20:00 CEST and until further notice. The mailing list will be moderated in accordance with the purpose of the mailing list and the principles of the RIPE Code of Conduct by a designated member of the RIPE NCC Executive Board and a RIPE NCC staff member. All emails, accepted or rejected, will be archived on the RIPE NCC website.” The minutes of the Board meeting will be published soon. With this resolution, the principles of the RIPE Code of Conduct will be applied to the members-discuss list. Emails that do not meet the requirements of the code of conduct will not be approved to be posted to the list. Mails that do not meet the intended purpose of providing members with a means to discuss membership issues among themselves will also not be approved to be posted to the list. The moderators of the list will be the Executive Board Secretary and one member of RIPE NCC staff. Mails will be moderated during office hours. A separate archive of all mails, including those rejected by the moderators, is available for all members to view should they wish to do so. Mails on the unmoderated list are deleted after three months. https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/members-discuss-unmoderated@ripe.net/ Sincerely, Hans Petter Holen Managing Director and CEO RIPE NCC

1 0

Re: Reminder that Charging Scheme Task Force comments are open until the end of the month
by D. Walde - Walde IT-Systemhaus 02 Jun '25

02 Jun '25

It's about fair distribution. And companies that earn millions should also understand that they have to do their share. And not just laugh and say, "Yeah, unfortunately, you came 30 years too late." You won't even be able to get started in the market. We need to come up with a new fee structure that is fair to all members. Yes, I'm exaggerating about the statement about millions. But it should be possible to even consider approaches to a fair model. Everyone should openly say how we could improve the model without being immediately punished by others. Suggestions are welcome. Just because the model is 30 years old doesn't necessarily make it good or fair. Suggestions are ideas, and they can be good, bad, or whatever. But that's what suggestions are about: the exchange of ideas and opinions. Just because I like chocolate ice cream the most doesn't mean everyone has to share my opinion. or even like ice cream. Greetings, Dirk -- Best regards / Mit freundlichen Grüßen Walde IT-Systemhaus - CEO Dirk Walde - IT-Specialist

12 38

Re: Reminder that Charging Scheme Task Force comments are open until the end of the month
by Matthias Brumm 31 May '25

31 May '25

Hi! If you mean the network administrators in organisations, we are on the same page. Because of them, ISPs feel the need of IPv4. End users / consumers and network / backbone operators are good to go. Matthias Am Samstag, dem 31.05.2025 um 12:39 +0200 schrieb Kees Meijs | Nefos: > > Hi, > > End users don't care for IPv6 (or even known about) when "it works". > It's the local network administrators. > > K. > > On 31-05-2025 11:13, Matthias Brumm wrote: > > > > > > But I do not think the network operators are the breaking point, it > > is > > the customers who are afraid of IPv6. > > > >

1 0

Analysis on Participation in May 2025 GM
by Ilke Ilhan 30 May '25

30 May '25

Hi all, Following the GM on 14 May, we analysed participation and reflected on turnout. In this new article on RIPE Labs, we share our thoughts on what we saw: https://labs.ripe.net/author/ilke-ilhan/gm-may-2025-a-deep-dive-into-low-tu… Let us know what else you'd like to see covered in these post-GM pieces. Cheers, Ilke

2 2