- members-discuss - mailman.ripe.net

Filter your mail and don't spam this list with unsubscribe requests (you can unsubscribe via LIR Portal)
by Ondřej Surý 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

People, are you aware that your unsubscribe request goes to all people subscribed to this list? Please don't send unsusbcribe requests to this list. There are headers in each message from this list: List-Subscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss>, <mailto:members-discuss-request@ripe.net?subject=subscribe> List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss>, <mailto:members-discuss-request@ripe.net?subject=unsubscribe> And if you open that address you will discover that: "Subscription to this list is for RIPE NCC members only and can be done through the LIR Portal." So please, if you want to be unsubscribed from this list, go to your account in LIR Portal and unsubscribe there Also please how to use filtering in your mail client - in case you don't want to follow-up heated debate, just create filter on subject of this discussion, and you will still receive all other emails. Ondrej On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Omar Awwad<omar(a)sama.jo> wrote: > Please remove my address from this discussion > > omar(a)sama.jo > > omar(a)samatelecom.com > > > > > > From: members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net] > On Behalf Of Fitzgerald, Emma > Sent: Monday, June 22, 2009 11:36 AM > To: members-discuss(a)ripe.net; members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net > Subject: RE: Betr.: [members-discuss] Please remove my address > > > > Please remove my address ! > > > > emma.fitzgerald(a)colt.net > > > > ************************************************************************************* > The message is intended for the named addressee only and may not be > disclosed to or used by anyone else, nor may it be copied in any way. > > The contents of this message and its attachments are confidential and may > also be subject to legal privilege. If you are not the named addressee > and/or have received this message in error, please advise us by e-mailing > security(a)colt.net and delete the message and any attachments without > retaining any copies. > > Internet communications are not secure and COLT does not accept > responsibility for this message, its contents nor responsibility for any > viruses. > > No contracts can be created or varied on behalf of COLT Telecommunications, > its subsidiaries or affiliates ("COLT") and any other party by email > Communications unless expressly agreed in writing with such other party. > > Please note that incoming emails will be automatically scanned to eliminate > potential viruses and unsolicited promotional emails. For more information > refer to www.colt.net or contact us on +44(0)20 7390 3900. -- Ondrej Sury technicky reditel/Chief Technical Officer ----------------------------------------- CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry Americka 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ sip:ondrej.sury@nic.cz tel:+420.222745110 mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112 -----------------------------------------

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Roman Kalendaryov 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

Please remove my e-mail address from this discussion. Regards, Roman Kalendaryov * Email: roman.k(a)orange.co.il <mailto:itai-f@bynet.co.il> * Tel: +972-54-7812385 * Mobile: +972-54-5942385 IP Advanced Solutions & Security Manager Technologies Division Partner Communications Company Ltd. ------------------------------------------------------------ This message contains information that may be confidential or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone any of the information in this message. If you have received this message and are not the intended recipient, kindly notify the sender and delete this message from your computer.

1 0

Re: [SPAM] - Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010 - Email found in subject
by alopez＠adif.es 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

Please remove my address I did not request to be included ----- Mensaje original ----- De: Saeed Khalid [saeed.khalid(a)etisalcom.com] Enviado: 20/06/2009 11:38 ZE3 Para: Abdullah Al-Batati <batatia(a)sbm.com.sa>; Max Tulyev <president(a)ukraine.su> CC: "members-discuss(a)ripe.net" <members-discuss(a)ripe.net>; "members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net" <members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net> Asunto: RE: [SPAM] - Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010 - Email found in subject Please also remove my address on urgent basis Best Regards, Saeed Khalid Head of Technical & Network Services Etisalcom Bahrain W.L.L. Cell +973 36070205 ________________________________ From: members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net [mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Abdullah Al-Batati Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2009 1:29 AM To: Max Tulyev Cc: members-discuss(a)ripe.net; members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net Subject: [SPAM] - Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010 - Email found in subject Gentlemen, Kindly remove my name from list. it's too much e-mail I'm receiving daily with no action is required from my side. Regards, Abdullah Al-Batati Acting Field Manager, Integrated Technology Services Western Region Tel : 966-2-6104163 Mobile: 0503678658 Saudi Business Machines, Ltd. General Marketing & Services Representative of IBM WTC Max Tulyev <president(a)ukraine.su> Sent by: members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net 06/20/2009 12:32 AM To members-discuss(a)ripe.net cc Subject Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010 Martin List-Petersen wrote: > Again. Differentiate between RIPE and the RIPE NCC. RIPE is the LIR > membership. The RIPE NCC handles the ressources and actions the > policies, that have been worked out by the RIPE membership (the LIRs). Wrong. RIPE is an open community, anyone can join for free just by signing on the interesting lists. You don't have to be a LIR representative for that. LIRs are stakeholders of RIPE _NCC_ ;) -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@FIDO) __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 4173 (20090620) __________ The message was checked by ESET Smart Security. http://www.eset.com

2 1

Fwd: Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Hank Nussbacher 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

>> >>Well, >>they didn't leave. They were in the back of the room. >> >>But yes, any online voting system will >> >>a) give more people a chance to vote >> >>and >> >>b) be more precise >> >> >>I just stated by personal preference and reasoning. Do what you want >>from there :) I know what I'm voting for, if it comes up to a vote. > >Problem is it will probably brought for a vote at the next AGM where it >will be defeated since the 50 LIRs who attend probably won't want their >vote diluted by the unwashed masses. > >-Hank To change voting: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/articles-association.html#seventeen we have to go via: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/articles-association.html#twenty and will require 2/3 of those voting to be in favor of the change! -Hank

1 0

Remove My Name.
by aaldafiri＠gic.com.kw 22 Jun '09

22 Jun '09

Hello, Can you please Unsubscribe my email address from the above list please ? Thank You. Ahmed Al-Dafiri Enterprise Network Manager Information Technology Department Office : +(965) 222-5082 Fax: +(965) 222-5010 Email :aaldafiri@gic.com.kw Gulf investment Corporation. This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is protected by copyright, is privileged confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please return this message to the sender at the email address of the sender and destroy any copies of the message you may have. Please not: The electronic communication may not be secured and therefore Gulf Investment Corporation does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message.

1 0

Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Natalya Petrova 21 Jun '09

21 Jun '09

RegID: kz.kazaktelecom Good morning, dear colleagues! Thanks for your message. I have read on a site the information be relative Charging Scheme 2010. There are some questions for me. I ask the help in the explanatory. Questions: 1) " - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment and the fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It mentions only PI? or PA? or PI+PA? 2) "fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It every month a payment? or every quarter? or for a year? 3) "fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - It is payment for what quantity of addresses (50EUR= ? IPs)? 4) " - Direct assignments will have a recurring charge per assignment and the fee will be EUR 50 per direct assignment" - Operates for all direct assignments? or Only new direct assignments (included after 3 May, 2009)? I shall be very grateful for explanatories. Thanks for the help and understanding. Yours faithfully, Natalya

31 64

Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Michiel Klaver 19 Jun '09

19 Jun '09

> On 19-6-2009 12:34, Sven Olaf Kamphuis wrote: >> >> (before we registered our first PI block I even called and asked them >> if PROVIDER INDEPENDANT space would not cause recurring fees for us, >> and they said no. (besides the showing up in the billing score for a >> short time, which ofcourse is calculated into our one-time >> administration fee.) >> The RIPE example contract(1) for the 2007-01 policy indicated there should be a periodic maintenance fee under section 4.2. At the last RIPE meeting there were questions asked about the amount that a LIR should ask for this fee, but no concrete answers were given. The new (draft) charging scheme indicates an amount of 50eur/year, but all our new 2007-01 PI space with contracts have a lower maintenance fee amount. It would have been a lot less complicated if this was discussed and all clear before the new PI policy 2007-01 was accepted. (1) http://www.ripe.net/membership/lir-end-user-agreement.html With kind regards, Michiel Klaver BA.ict GrafiX Internet B.V. Stationsplein 20 2907 MJ Capelle aan den IJssel The Netherlands Web: http://grafix.nl/ Tel: +31-(0)10-2640210 Fax: +31-(0)10-2640211 Providing high-end professional internet services at our privately owned net-neutral in-house Data Center Facilities in Capelle aan den IJssel and Alphen aan den Rijn. Connected at TeleCityRedbus2 (Amsterdam) and Spaanse Kubus (Rotterdam).

5 7

AW: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Marcus.Gerdon 19 Jun '09

19 Jun '09

So that would be an easy one: To receive provider-independent resources get into contract with RIPE-NCC. Without any other way. Only problem with this 'Direct End User Assignment' is the horrible, far to high fee NCC want's to invoice. My theory: our dear hostmasters don't want to have the typical end-user hassle themselves and simply go for keeping that which has been made possible by 2007-01 far away by simply setting the fee high enough. Being forced to have a LIR handle a independent resource makes that resource dependent. just my 2c. Marcus ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Engineering IP Services Versatel West GmbH Unterste-Wilms-Strasse 29 D-44143 Dortmund Fon: +49-(0)231-399-4486 | Fax: +49-(0)231-399-4491 marcus.gerdon(a)versatel.de | www.versatel.de Sitz der Gesellschaft: Dortmund | Registergericht: Dortmund HRB 21738 Geschäftsführer: Marc Lützenkirchen, Dr. Hai Cheng, Dr. Max Padberg, Peter Schindler ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AS8881 / AS8638 / AS13270 | MG3031-RIPE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net > [mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net] Im Auftrag von Geraint Evans > Gesendet: Freitag, 19. Juni 2009 11:13 > An: Jon Morby; lir(a)uralttk.ru > Cc: Sven Olaf Kamphuis; Martin List-Petersen; lir(a)uralttk.ru; > Sven Olaf Kamphuis; members-discuss(a)ripe.net > Betreff: RE: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010 > > The simple fact of the matter is PI space is not effectively > being controlled. > > RIPE need to take control of it so that we don't have the > same problems with IPv6 as we do now with IPv4. > > PI space has been passed to end users, and because its P.I no > one is really maintaining who has what and what it is being used for. > > By making LIR's responsible for the relationship with the end > user of the P.I a reclamation can be easily achieved - if > needed, I don't agree with the charging but I do agree with > making whoever requested the P.I space on behalf of a client > responsible. > > > Geraint > > -----Original Message----- > From: members-discuss-admin(a)ripe.net > [mailto:members-discuss-admin@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Jon Morby > Sent: 19 June 2009 09:29 > To: lir(a)uralttk.ru > Cc: Sven Olaf Kamphuis; Martin List-Petersen; lir(a)uralttk.ru; > Sven Olaf Kamphuis; members-discuss(a)ripe.net > Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010 > > And sadly it is a precedent ... EUR50 this year .... EUR500 the year > after ... EUR5000 the year after that ?? > > Once it has been agreed in principal that we RIPE should start > charging for an assignment, it is then possible for "the few" > who are > able to make it to these RIPE jollies^Wmeetings all over Europe and > steer the policies then do so to their best interests. > > We've seen this recently with Nominet in the UK where by they > now have > 2 tiers of access, and it is no longer a "level playing > field" for all > members .. you have members, and you have "elite" members > > I totally agree that RIPE have been needlessly steering > everyone into > becoming an LIR when they only need a small assignment, and this has > lead to a waste of IP allocations .. however my understanding > is that > this policy isn't designed to limit PA space assignments > anyway ... it > is designed to make PI harder to obtain, thus steering yet > more people > into the LIR route (whether they need to be an LIR or not) ... > > How many LIRs find RIPE referring customers to them because they > needed an assignment? Few I suspect - they all either get told "go > find one from this list" or otherwise "become an LIR" and pay the > small LIR fee. > > Maybe its just me only seeing the glass as half full? > > Jon > > On 19 Jun 2009, at 09:16, Heidrich Attila wrote: > > > I think you do. > > > > Consider the domain registration. The registrator is kinda "service > > provider" whether it serves any kind of > access/hosting/content/DNS or > > whatever, and the end user is the only "independent" user > of the named > > resource - but not owner. > > > > I think this is very similar to the PI assignments. In > Hungary this is > > normal the regitrstor having a one time enrollment feer, a > yearly fee > > (well, this contains registration fees for the whole amount), and > > per-transaction fees after all new registration, transfers, and > > prolongals. > > > > I do not think EUR50 to be so big problem, but we are an ISP, so > > this is > > quite normal for us to have the customer pay after allocating > > resources > > of any kind. > > > > Attila > > > > -----Eredeti üzenet----- > > > >> Not every LIR is an ISP, a lot of them are. If you assign PI to > >> somebody > >> else, you have a provider/enduser relationship. That makes you a > >> service > >> provider of some sort. Be it internet, content or hosting. > > > > no, you dont. > > > > the customer usually asks to just register ip space and an > AS number > > which > > he then announces himself to transits of -his- choice. > > > > > > > > -------------- > > Ezen uzenet kizarolag a cimzettjenek szol es olyan bizalmas jellegu > > informaciokat tartalmazhat, amelyek feltarasat jogszabaly vagy > > szerzodes > > tiltja. Amennyiben a jelen uzenetet On teves kezbesites > folytan kapta, > > kerjuk haladektalanul ertesitsen bennunket es az uzenetet annak > > csatolmanyaival egyutt torolje. Amennyiben On nem cimzettje a jelen > > uzenetnek, annak es mellekleteinek elolvasasa, masolasa, > > tovabbitasa, vagy > > barmely celbol torteno felhasznalasa szigoruan tilos. > Megjegyezzuk, > > hogy az > > e-mail utjan torteno kozlesek nem garantaljak az elkuldott uzenetek > > bizalmas jellegenek es teljessegenek megorzeset, valamint > az uzenetek > > megfelelo kezbesiteset. A fentieken tulmenoen, a Hungarian > Telephone > > and > > Cable Corp., annak kapcsolt vallalkozasai, illetve az altaluk > > megbizott > > harmadik felek a jelen e-mail cimrol kuldott, vagy arra > erkezo barmely > > uzenetet ellenorizhetnek, lemasolhatnak, felhasznalhatnak vagy > > harmadik fel > > reszere tovabbithatnak. > > > > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee and > may contain > > confidential information protected from disclosure by law or > > contract. If > > you have received this message in error, please immediately notify > > us and > > delete it together with its attachments. If you are not an > addressee > > of > > this message, reading, copying, distribution or use for any > purpose > > of the > > contents of this message or its attachments is strictly forbidden. > > Additionally, please note that communication by email guarantees > > neither > > the confidentiality nor the completeness or proper receipt of the > > messages > > sent. Furthermore, Hungarian Telephone and Cable Corp., its > > affiliates and > > third parties retained by them may monitor, copy, use or > forward to > > third > > parties any outgoing messages from and incoming messages to > this email > > address. > > > >

2 1

Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Sven Olaf Kamphuis 19 Jun '09

19 Jun '09

yes! voting through the lir portal, great idea. (first on the agenda, the correction of 2007-01).. -- Sven Olaf Kamphuis CB3ROB DataServices Phone: +31/87-8747479 Skype: CB3ROB MSN: sven(a)cb3rob.net C.V.: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cb3rob Confidential: Please be advised that the information contained in this email message, including all attached documents or files, is privileged and confidential and is intended only for the use of the individual or individuals addressed. Any other use, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. On Fri, 19 Jun 2009, David Crane wrote: > > On 19 Jun 2009, at 11:01, Jon Morby wrote: > > > I'd be happier voting based on the minutes of the meeting through > > the LIR portal however ... and even happier if I can watch a stream > > of the whole proceedings on the basis it is difficult for me to get > > to any of these events > > > This would be perfect. Much more democratic way of getting opinions > off people without impacting upon our working days. > > -Dave. > > > > > X-CONTACT-FILTER-MATCH: "ripe.net" >

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] Discuss Charging Scheme 2010
by Jeroen Wunnink 19 Jun '09

19 Jun '09

We've been discussing this draft with some of the NLNOG'ers (Dutch network operators), and from what we (or at least I) understood in a nutshell: In this draft, the PI space will lose it's scoring points scheme, and it'll just cost 50 euro's/year for an allocation (doesn't matter if it's a /24 or a /21 ?) Now a lot can (and has) already been said about the administrative implications, but from an operational standpoint it raises a few questions here. If a PI assignment will 'only' cost 50 euro's a year, won't everyone and his dog with a good story on why they need PI space just request their own range ?, I'm seeing a flurry of new customers with 1 or 2 servers knocking at our door to colocate these and say: 'Hey we have our own PI space, we don't need part of your PA, please add our range to your routers' Resulting lots of new small fragmented prefixes being added to the already growing global routing table.. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Jeroen Wunnink, EasyHosting B.V. Systeembeheerder systeembeheer(a)easyhosting.nl telefoon:+31 (035) 6285455 Postbus 48 fax: +31 (035) 6838242 3755 ZG Eemnes http://www.easyhosting.nl http://www.easycolocate.nl

9 11