Hello, Even all of us to seeing this discussion as spam. I think it is useful and all candidates for election must write their ideas and point of views too. Now I can clearly make my judgment if to give my vote for mr Elad Khoen or not. PS: The spamming come from all who try to respond to these technical ideas. So please stop ! Just read make your mind and lets hear the others candidates.
Most people who are standing as candidates won't resort to personal attacks when their ideas are constructively criticised. Responding to technical ideas with constructive criticism is not spam. Constant flaming and conspiracy theories sent on a membership mailing list is spam. If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of ivaylo Sent: 01 May 2020 10:03 To: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: [members-discuss] Good to know Hello, Even all of us to seeing this discussion as spam. I think it is useful and all candidates for election must write their ideas and point of views too. Now I can clearly make my judgment if to give my vote for mr Elad Khoen or not. PS: The spamming come from all who try to respond to these technical ideas. So please stop ! Just read make your mind and lets hear the others candidates. _______________________________________________
Craig, You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was personally attacked. --- If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. --- In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come true and no one else will push them. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Craig Arnold <craig.arnold@airband.co.uk> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 1:00 PM To: ivaylo <ivaylo@bglans.net>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know Most people who are standing as candidates won't resort to personal attacks when their ideas are constructively criticised. Responding to technical ideas with constructive criticism is not spam. Constant flaming and conspiracy theories sent on a membership mailing list is spam. If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. -----Original Message----- From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> On Behalf Of ivaylo Sent: 01 May 2020 10:03 To: members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: [members-discuss] Good to know Hello, Even all of us to seeing this discussion as spam. I think it is useful and all candidates for election must write their ideas and point of views too. Now I can clearly make my judgment if to give my vote for mr Elad Khoen or not. PS: The spamming come from all who try to respond to these technical ideas. So please stop ! Just read make your mind and lets hear the others candidates. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
On 2020-05-01 13:33, Elad Cohen wrote:
Craig,
You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was personally attacked.
--- If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. --- In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come true and no one else will push them. As far as I know, Internet standards are accepted collectively, and this does not require person to be internet czar. My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone. And almost always in the process of technical discussion in relevant workgroups, ideas are adjusted and finalized. Can we see somewhere a previous technical discussions, in relevant workgroups, where all these proposals were discussed, improved and seems rejected for an apparently unfair reason?
And, in general - trying to force on everybody technically poorly thought-out decisions using power - is an extremely bad idea.
---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers). Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 1:56 PM To: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 2020-05-01 13:33, Elad Cohen wrote:
Craig,
You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was personally attacked.
--- If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. --- In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come true and no one else will push them. As far as I know, Internet standards are accepted collectively, and this does not require person to be internet czar. My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone. And almost always in the process of technical discussion in relevant workgroups, ideas are adjusted and finalized. Can we see somewhere a previous technical discussions, in relevant workgroups, where all these proposals were discussed, improved and seems rejected for an apparently unfair reason?
And, in general - trying to force on everybody technically poorly thought-out decisions using power - is an extremely bad idea. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
Elad, Why do you hate IPv6 so much? How does a person become "related" to IPv6? Why can you not simply accept that your ideas are flawed, they simply cannot be implemented no matter how many times you say you will get it done if you are elected. It's the same as me saying if I get to be chair, everyone can have a free router hardware upgrade. As RIPE chair I will just make Juniper, Cisco et-al provide the equipment free of charge because it will make the internet better. With the power of the RIRs no manufacturer can say no. I'm sure you will say this is a personal attack on you, or that I am part of an IPv6 conspiracy, or I have secret dealings with a spam blacklist company. Bottom line is, you have proved yourself to be unfit for office. You tell members to go sit in a corner, that RIPE is corrupt, you show no respect for anyone with an opinion different to yours. I cannot think of a worse candidate. The only possible good that has come from your posting is you alerting people to just how dangerous a person you would be if given any kind of power. I am now, like so many others, off to file a complaint about you to RIPE. Best regards, Stuart Willet. From: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Elad Cohen Sent: 01 May 2020 12:03 To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>; members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know ---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers). Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> on behalf of Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com<mailto:nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 1:56 PM To: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 2020-05-01 13:33, Elad Cohen wrote:
Craig,
You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was personally attacked.
--- If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. --- In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come true and no one else will push them. As far as I know, Internet standards are accepted collectively, and this does not require person to be internet czar. My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone. And almost always in the process of technical discussion in relevant workgroups, ideas are adjusted and finalized. Can we see somewhere a previous technical discussions, in relevant workgroups, where all these proposals were discussed, improved and seems rejected for an apparently unfair reason?
And, in general - trying to force on everybody technically poorly thought-out decisions using power - is an extremely bad idea. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
Stuart, You were asked to go to the sandbox where your friends are at, but you still keep spamming the list, go spam Ripe as you wrote and leave us alone please. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: Stuart Willet (primary) <stu@safehosts.co.uk> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:11 PM To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io>; Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: RE: [members-discuss] Good to know Elad, Why do you hate IPv6 so much? How does a person become “related” to IPv6? Why can you not simply accept that your ideas are flawed, they simply cannot be implemented no matter how many times you say you will get it done if you are elected. It’s the same as me saying if I get to be chair, everyone can have a free router hardware upgrade. As RIPE chair I will just make Juniper, Cisco et-al provide the equipment free of charge because it will make the internet better. With the power of the RIRs no manufacturer can say no. I’m sure you will say this is a personal attack on you, or that I am part of an IPv6 conspiracy, or I have secret dealings with a spam blacklist company. Bottom line is, you have proved yourself to be unfit for office. You tell members to go sit in a corner, that RIPE is corrupt, you show no respect for anyone with an opinion different to yours. I cannot think of a worse candidate. The only possible good that has come from your posting is you alerting people to just how dangerous a person you would be if given any kind of power. I am now, like so many others, off to file a complaint about you to RIPE. Best regards, Stuart Willet. From: members-discuss [mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net] On Behalf Of Elad Cohen Sent: 01 May 2020 12:03 To: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>; members-discuss@ripe.net Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know ---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers). Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net>> on behalf of Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com<mailto:nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com>> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 1:56 PM To: members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> <members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net>> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 2020-05-01 13:33, Elad Cohen wrote:
Craig,
You are the one currently personally attacking and I'm asking from you to stop and not to spam the list, all I did was to make 3 posts regarding what I will show in the General Meetings and then I was personally attacked.
--- If someone feels so strongly about current issues, and has ideas on how to combat them, they don't need to be elected to the RIPE NCC board to realise their ideas. --- In reality, in order to make an idea come true - power is needed - in this case the power of Ripe and power of the other RIR's which are connected to Ripe, you are only attacking and you have no clue in what you are writing, in how to implement new methods, in how to change habits. Without me being in the Ripe Board the ideas will not come true and no one else will push them. As far as I know, Internet standards are accepted collectively, and this does not require person to be internet czar. My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone. And almost always in the process of technical discussion in relevant workgroups, ideas are adjusted and finalized. Can we see somewhere a previous technical discussions, in relevant workgroups, where all these proposals were discussed, improved and seems rejected for an apparently unfair reason?
And, in general - trying to force on everybody technically poorly thought-out decisions using power - is an extremely bad idea. _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
On 2020-05-01 14:02, Elad Cohen wrote:
---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers).
Respectfully, Elad
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment). And yet, I repeat the question - can I see where these ideas were discussed previously?
Google them, now let us please not write any new response to the list and respect the list. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:11 PM To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 2020-05-01 14:02, Elad Cohen wrote:
---- "My personal experience - if the idea(technical) is really good, worked out in detail and well prepared - it will be accepted from anyone." ---- This list showed to you that anyone related to IPv6 will resist IPv4+ , an idea can implement changes that will hurt people enjoying from the current state (such as IPv6 deployers).
Respectfully, Elad
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment). And yet, I repeat the question - can I see where these ideas were discussed previously?
On 2020-05-01 14:20, Elad Cohen wrote:
Google them, now let us please not write any new response to the list and respect the list.
Respectfully, Elad
I searched, did not found discussions on these ideas, especially where you was participating. I would be grateful if you provided the community with such links in order to better get understanding of technical sides, pros/cons and etc. It's essential since you want the power to implement these ideas. And important nuance, as I wrote earlier, such power to implement technical ideas is required in very exceptional cases, when the idea cannot be implemented in a normal way(and someone tried to implement normal way).
On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks about, bending the subject. Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing. Regards, Arjen
Vevida, The specs you can see in my first post. Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now. Now let us all be quiet and respect the list. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster@vevida.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks about, bending the subject. Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing. Regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
Ragazzi avete rotto i coglioni cazzo. Andate a parlare su un forum, fate un post su linkedin ma non rompete il cazzo qui su processori fpga,risc... Adesso nella vostra lingua, andatevi a tradurre tutto. Siete dei maleducati Please forgive me all others Best Regards Roberto Beneduci
Il giorno 1 mag 2020, alle ore 14:02, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> ha scritto:
Vevida, The specs you can see in my first post. Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now. Now let us all be quiet and respect the list. Respectfully, Elad From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster@vevida.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks about, bending the subject. Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing. Regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/roberto.beneduci%40co... Le informazioni contenute nel presente messaggio, inclusi i relativi ed eventuali allegati, sono di natura strettamente riservata e destinate all'uso esclusivo da parte del legittimo ricevente. Si comunica pertanto come la diffusione, la copia e/o l'inoltro non autorizzato della presente email costituisca reato ai sensi dell’art. 616 c.p.. In tal senso, qualora il messaggio Le fosse pervenuto per errore, è fatto espresso divieto di copiare, inoltrare e/o rendere altrimenti noto a terzi il contenuto del presente messaggio e dei suoi eventuali allegati. La preghiamo cortesemente di cancellare immediatamente il messaggio pervenutoLe per errore, nonché di avvisare il mittente. Si ringrazia anticipatamente per la collaborazione.
According to H. L. Mencken, "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." Elad Cohen just gave us three good examples of this, proposing for three different complex problems three simple solutions, which are wrong. Thank you, Elad. We understood Mencken's lesson, now you can stop. Regards -- Franco Tauceri DomainRegister m: 39.3483064202 w: https://DomainRegister.international e: franco.tauceri@domainregister.it On 01/05/2020 01:44 PM, Elad Cohen wrote:
Vevida,
The specs you can see in my first post.
Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now.
Now let us all be quiet and respect the list.
Respectfully, Elad
-------------------------
From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster@vevida.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know
On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks about, bending the subject.
Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing.
Regards,
Arjen
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io [1] _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/franco.tauceri%40doma...
Links: ------ [1] https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io
Franco, What you wrote makes a lot of sense, specially that it is not backed by anything, we all thank you. Respefctulley, Elad ________________________________ From: Franco Tauceri <franco.tauceri@domainregister.it> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 3:46 PM To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io>; members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know According to H. L. Mencken, "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." Elad Cohen just gave us three good examples of this, proposing for three different complex problems three simple solutions, which are wrong. Thank you, Elad. We understood Mencken's lesson, now you can stop. Regards -- [https://domainregister.international/templates/dr/assets/images/dr-logo.svg] Franco Tauceri DomainRegister m: 39.3483064202 w: https://DomainRegister.international e: franco.tauceri@domainregister.it<mailto:franco.tauceri@domainregister.it> On 01/05/2020 01:44 PM, Elad Cohen wrote: Vevida, The specs you can see in my first post. Regarding FPGA - as I already explained in my first post and I need to repeat and to spam the list because of you - any end-device (can it be ASIC / FPGA / Windows operating system / Linux operating system / etc) will not be able to speak IPv4+ unless it will be updated/upgraded, but even if it will not be updated/upgraded it will still be able to speak IPv4 exactly like it is now, the internet will not break, it will just be able to reach IPv4 destination addresses - exactly like it is working now. Now let us all be quiet and respect the list. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: members-discuss <members-discuss-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Vevida Hostmaster <hostmaster@vevida.com> Sent: Friday, May 1, 2020 2:38 PM Cc: members-discuss@ripe.net <members-discuss@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [members-discuss] Good to know On 01-05-2020 13:11, Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote:
This mailing list, IMHO, is not intended for such technical discussions at all. Starting with the fact that most likely relevant experts not present here, who can give reasoned answers/proposals (for example, those who develop chipsets for network equipment).
True that. This is no place for that. Buteven *if* there would be someone who actually created an FPGA or three for routing he would still continue to talk bullcrap, and say that he would not know what he talks about, bending the subject. Fact is, there only hollow words, no spec, no RFC, no PoC, no nothing. Regards, Arjen _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/elad%40netstyle.io _______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net<mailto:members-discuss@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/franco.tauceri%40doma...
participants (8)
-
Craig Arnold -
Denys Fedoryshchenko -
Elad Cohen -
Franco Tauceri -
ivaylo -
Roberto Beneduci -
Stuart Willet (primary) -
Vevida Hostmaster