On 2 Aug 2026, at 16:51, denis walker <ripedenis@gmail.com> wrote: [..] As things stand there is no accountability, no penalty. It's either full closure or untouchable. We need a rethink and a reset. This is what I am working on....
Reverse DNS is needed to spam properly. IRR / RPKI / ASPA is needed to route (though RPKI/ASPA becomes 'unknown' which is the majority of prefixes today) So yes, if a RIR does not delegate then a prefix becomes a lot less useable. Thus marking a LIR as 'under investigation' or similar and then at non-response closing it can be a means to stop the abuse. But, it becomes really tricky if an LIR is saying one thing and a pile of others are saying another (they did abuse etc) And I do not think RIRs have the resources (unless membership fees go insane) to resolve that. Even if a RIR gives out an 'advise' that the resources are 'tainted' or 'likely abuse' a legal proceeding can cause a whole lot of problems for the RIR. Same for blacklists of course, as the folks from the original MAPS and nowadays Spamhaus and similar setups can attest to, the legal issues are the biggest problem there. (and for some on the wrong side, people claim that the *good* people from Spamhaus do not respond to the delisting requests etc... ) Regards, Jeroen