W dniu 2016-02-11 o 16:52, Jack pisze:
Well there are compagnies in that wild world that : - are "new" (didn't exists in near 2k) - have a huge utilization of IP addresses - do not have enough money to pay 15€/IPv4
Are they just supposed to die ? You cannot blame the survive instinct:)
Buying a compagny to get its IP are a solution for rich people, I am pretty sure that google, lvl3 nor akamai will ever run out of IP
I agree with Jack. Market price per IP is to expensive. We have lot of small companies in Poland which are serving services in "white area's - called white stains - where there is no business for big ISP to invest ", this is more voluntary services than business. All they have the same problem - lack of IPv4. But I think problem is similar in other countries. Setup additional LIR account is not logical. Why to pay /22 if you don't need this at this moment. I think it should be "Additional Fee for resources additional resources more than /22 " It should be based on minimal /24 allocation and with annual fee that will not exceed annual provider fee for /22. This fee should be based on quarter of year. With some reasonable request limit by year. For example annual fee for /24 is 340E If you request it in May you will pay 225E. If you lost a client you will return /24 back to ripe. It will help smaller ISP/LIRs to serve our services. We have almost 4500 km of network with /22. I know companies who do not have any network now but they have /18 /20. It should be a rule to get legal address space, not buying it from the market. Best regards Dariusz Siedlecki Glenbrook