Hi Gert, Thank you for your reply. It isn't a secret, we're facing with a problem to get the resources for the testing (not for the customers). On 10/25/21 9:29 AM, Gert Doering wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:18:35AM +0300, Sergei Volgapkin wrote:
May you find the time to tell your opinion about situation with "Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies" (https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587).
We've found that RIPE Team can reply you in this manner "/at this moment we have not received //*sufficient evidence*//in order to see that the request for a temporary assignment is justified/"/./ If you ask about examples of "sufficient evidence" you may get the answer like this "/I am afraid that we are not able to give any examples. Temporary assignments are provided on a case-by-case basis and there is not a 'standard template' for this./"
It means that RIPE able selectively accept requests for the temporary assignments and not every LIR has the same capabilities.
I think that this service should have just standard request form. I'm appreciate for your time and answers. This sounds more like a question for the address policy working group.
And yes, of course this is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, as https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587 is deliberately not including a positive list, because that would limit its use for new things that haven't been tried before.
*So, out of curiosity, what purpose were you requesting address for that got denied? "Assignment to customers", for example, is something the NCC would be correctly refusing.*
Gert Doering -- NetMaster
-- Sergei