Hi Gert,

Thank you for your reply.

It isn't a secret, we're facing with a problem to get the resources for the testing (not for the customers).

Hi,

On Mon, Oct 25, 2021 at 09:18:35AM +0300, Sergei Volgapkin wrote:

May you find the time to tell your opinion about situation with 
"Temporary Internet Number Assignment Policies" 
(https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587).

We've found that RIPE Team can reply you in this manner "/at this moment 
we have not received //*sufficient evidence*//in order to see that the 
request for a temporary assignment is justified/"/./
If you ask about examples of "sufficient evidence" you may get the 
answer like this "/I am afraid that we are not able to give any 
examples. Temporary assignments are provided on a case-by-case basis and 
there is not a 'standard template' for this./"

It means that RIPE able selectively accept requests for the temporary 
assignments and not every LIR has the same capabilities.

I think that this service should have just standard request form. I'm 
appreciate for your time and answers.

This sounds more like a question for the address policy working group.

And yes, of course this is evaluated on a case-by-case basis, as 
https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-587 is deliberately not
including a positive list, because that would limit its use for new
things that haven't been tried before.


So, out of curiosity, what purpose were you requesting address for that
got denied?  "Assignment to customers", for example, is something the
NCC would be correctly refusing.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster

-- 
Sergei