Hi all, Is it worth seeing if there is another organisation who could take RIPE's work and knowledge, and further the cause if RIPE are withdrawing development time? I suspect a lot more organisations would be interested in a product if it had the RIPE brand on it, even if RIPE were not completely involved in it's development. Just my 2 pence. Harry On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:09 PM Lukas Tribus <lukas@ltri.eu> wrote:
Gert wrote:
When we looked at possible software options for our RPKI validator, we compared performance, memory, robustness, agility of development, and this all concluded in "this was nice as a demonstration vehicle, but I do not want to run it near a any production system, ever".
The real issue is: a lot of network operators do NOT have the time for this kind of assessment. They make a judgement call based on the good overall reputation of RIPE (and as Erik mentioned: training) and just go with it.
I agree and support sunsetting the development of the RIPE RPKI validator.
-- lukas
_______________________________________________ members-discuss mailing list members-discuss@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/me%40harrycross.me