Hi all,
Is it worth seeing if there is another organisation who could take RIPE's work and knowledge, and further the cause if RIPE are withdrawing development time? I suspect a lot more organisations would be interested in a product if it had the RIPE brand on it, even if RIPE were not completely involved in it's development.

Just my 2 pence.

Harry

On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:09 PM Lukas Tribus <lukas@ltri.eu> wrote:
Gert wrote:
> When we looked at possible software options for our RPKI validator, we
> compared performance, memory, robustness, agility of development, and
> this all concluded in "this was nice as a demonstration vehicle, but I do
> not want to run it near a any production system, ever".

The real issue is: a lot of network operators do NOT have the time for
this kind of assessment. They make a judgement call based on the good
overall reputation of RIPE (and as Erik mentioned: training) and just
go with it.

I agree and support sunsetting the development of the RIPE RPKI validator.

-- lukas

_______________________________________________
members-discuss mailing list
members-discuss@ripe.net
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/members-discuss
Unsubscribe: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/options/members-discuss/me%40harrycross.me