- members-discuss - mailman.ripe.net

Re: [members-discuss] LIRs from Donetsk area?
by ripe＠ntx.ru 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

The should be legal registration address in the correct country. Yuri@ntx Отправлено с устройства Samsung -------- Исходное сообщение -------- От: Sergey Myasoedov <kaa(a)net-art.cz> Дата: 28.06.2015 2:33 (GMT+02:00) Кому: Alexandr Popov <alexp(a)lec.tel>, members-discuss(a)ripe.net Тема: Re: [members-discuss] LIRs from Donetsk area? The only thing is missing is company form. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 28 Jun 2015, at 01:05, Alexandr Popov <alexp(a)lec.tel> wrote: > > I think that it is a company registered under Russian law, and having a post address in Lugansk. As Ukrainian company may have a post address in Moscow. This does not conflict international law. Do not panic : ) > > On Sun, 28 Jun 2015 00:33:49 +0200 > Andrei <ipas.master(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> there are 2 variants: >> 1) it's negligence from somebody from ripe ncc staff. >> 2) it's rebels/terrirists supports. And if I understand correctly this lir >> registration could get a legal action based on ukrainian / international >> laws. >> I think this issue must be escalated to ripe ncc manager staff first. >> On Jun 27, 2015 1:08 PM, "Maxim Usatov" <maxim.usatov(a)bcsatellite.net> >> wrote: >>> Alexandr, >>> >>> I am sure you realize what you have said below is nonsense. Eastern >>> Ukraine has not been annexed by Russia thus their mail system is not >>> authorized to carry any correspondence to Ukrainian cities. I will not >>> comment on your "ammo" thing. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Maxim Usatov, Founder and CTO * BusinessCom Networks >>> >>> On 6/27/15 10:27, Alexandr Popov wrote: >>> >>>> Post office does not work in Lugansk. However, the probability of >>>> receiving mail through the RUSSIAN FEDERATION much more than through >>>> UKRAINE. Since between Lugansk and RUSSIAN FEDERATION carried the movement >>>> of people and goods. And between Lugansk and Ukraine only ammo fly. >>>> >>>> On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:42:15 +0200 >>>> Andrei <ipas.master(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, this assignment looks like a joke because ripe ncc doesn't >>>> provide >>>> address check. I'm sure the documents could be received by recepient >>>> in >>>> lugans, RUSSIAN FEDERATION. It means the company information is not >>>> valid >>>> and it's RIPE requirements violation from the RIPE NCC staff. >>>> >>>> I'm sure the investigation is requiread and the action against RIPE >>>> NCC >>>> staff is required. >>>> On Jun 27, 2015 1:18 AM, "Sergey Myasoedov" <kaa(a)net-art.cz> wrote: >>>> >>>> To clarify my point: I suppose that some required checks were not >>>> done by >>>> the NCC. At least the company form is missing in the database >>>> object. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Sergey Myasoedov >>>> >>>> >>>> > On 27 Jun 2015, at 00:59, Alexander Zubkov <green(a)msu.ru> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > My point was not about this. There was complaints that RIPE NCC >>>> performing bad when registering LIR's. I just wanted to say that >>>> given that >>>> example, there is no reasons to complain on RIPE NCC in given >>>> aspect. >>>> > >>>> > Considering your question. As I know, Lugansk is not a part of >>>> Russia. >>>> It is not me, who have written such address, I do not why they >>>> have done >>>> it. More to say I found it confusing that it is in Lugansk, but >>>> states that >>>> it servicing DNR. But I have a little information about what >>>> interrelations >>>> they have. Do not want to justify somebody, but it is entirely >>>> possible >>>> that this is only option for them to receive mail in Lugansk. >>>> > >>>> > On 06/27/2015 01:17 AM, Yakimus // VOKS support wrote: >>>> >> Hi, Alexander! >>>> >> Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:53:03 +0300: >>>> >> >>>> >> AZ> Isn't it postal address supplied by LIR almost in free >>>> form? >>>> >> AZ> This can be absolutely legal Russian company with good >>>> >> AZ> papers, which specified such postal address. >>>> >> >>>> >> Is there in real a village/town/city in RF, named Lugansk? >>>> >> >>>> >> address: 93010 >>>> >> address: Lugansk >>>> >> address: RUSSIAN FEDERATION >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC >>>> members-discuss >>>> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to >>>> the >>>> general page: >>>> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >>>> >>>> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". >>>> From >>>> here, you can add or remove addresses. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ---- >>>> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >>>> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the >>>> general page: >>>> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >>>> >>>> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From >>>> here, you can add or remove addresses. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ---- >>> If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss >>> mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the >>> general page: >>> https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ >>> >>> Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From >>> here, you can add or remove addresses. >>> > > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. > ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] Discussion on LIRs from Donetsk Area
by ripe＠ntx.ru 29 Jun '15

29 Jun '15

Greetings, Agree, such documents could not confirm organisation status. I sugest persons should use real person id, if legal company status is not valid. Or any other people can issue own Republic and create any document by thier own? Yuri@ntx Отправлено с устройства Samsung -------- Исходное сообщение -------- От: Andrei Kushnireuski <ipas.master(a)gmail.com> Дата: 29.06.2015 20:58 (GMT+02:00) Кому: members-discuss(a)ripe.net Тема: Re: [members-discuss] Discussion on LIRs from Donetsk Area Hi. Does it mean the RIPE NCC staff approved the documents issued in Russia with registered address in Lugansk? If I understand correctly Lugansk is not occupied/annexed officially. It’s a part of Ukraine and any provided ’non-Ukrainian’ document is a useless scrap of paper. I don’t understand how is it possible to approve same documents? What is LIR registration based on? I think this registration is a part of big problem which is shown on this page: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/listings/RIPE > On 29 Jun 2015, at 15:53, Axel Pawlik <axel.pawlik(a)ripe.net> wrote: > > > > Dear colleagues, > > To clarify matters relating to the discussion on LIRs from the Donetsk > area, I would like to remind you of the RIPE NCC Executive Board's > resolution on continuity to service to all members. Please see the > statement at: > > https://www.ripe.net/publications/news/about-ripe-ncc-and-ripe/executive-bo… > > The RIPE NCC needs to confirm that an entity exists. Dutch law does not > restrict the RIPE NCC from using any means it finds appropriate as proof > that a legal entity exists. Documents issued by any national authority > are considered to be sufficient proof. > > The RIPE NCC can neither recognise nor deny one state’s authority over a > region. Given the situation, the RIPE NCC is striving to facilitate the > provision of its services to network operators in this area and does not > wish to deny services for political reasons. > > Our priority remains the provision of services to all our members. > > kind regards, > > Axel Pawlik > Managing Director > RIPE NCC > > ---- > If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss > mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: > https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ > > Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses. — Andrei Kushnireuski REGID: cz.alfatelecom nic-hdl: AK1065-RIPE ipas.master(a)gmail.com ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.

1 0

Re: [members-discuss] LIRs from Donetsk area?
by Alexandr Popov 28 Jun '15

28 Jun '15

Post office does not work in Lugansk. However, the probability of receiving mail through the RUSSIAN FEDERATION much more than through UKRAINE. Since between Lugansk and RUSSIAN FEDERATION carried the movement of people and goods. And between Lugansk and Ukraine only ammo fly. On Sat, 27 Jun 2015 09:42:15 +0200 Andrei <ipas.master(a)gmail.com> wrote: Yes, this assignment looks like a joke because ripe ncc doesn't provide address check. I'm sure the documents could be received by recepient in lugans, RUSSIAN FEDERATION. It means the company information is not valid and it's RIPE requirements violation from the RIPE NCC staff. I'm sure the investigation is requiread and the action against RIPE NCC staff is required. On Jun 27, 2015 1:18 AM, "Sergey Myasoedov" <kaa(a)net-art.cz> wrote: To clarify my point: I suppose that some required checks were not done by the NCC. At least the company form is missing in the database object. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 27 Jun 2015, at 00:59, Alexander Zubkov <green(a)msu.ru> wrote: > > My point was not about this. There was complaints that RIPE NCC performing bad when registering LIR's. I just wanted to say that given that example, there is no reasons to complain on RIPE NCC in given aspect. > > Considering your question. As I know, Lugansk is not a part of Russia. It is not me, who have written such address, I do not why they have done it. More to say I found it confusing that it is in Lugansk, but states that it servicing DNR. But I have a little information about what interrelations they have. Do not want to justify somebody, but it is entirely possible that this is only option for them to receive mail in Lugansk. > > On 06/27/2015 01:17 AM, Yakimus // VOKS support wrote: >> Hi, Alexander! >> Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:53:03 +0300: >> >> AZ> Isn't it postal address supplied by LIR almost in free form? >> AZ> This can be absolutely legal Russian company with good >> AZ> papers, which specified such postal address. >> >> Is there in real a village/town/city in RF, named Lugansk? >> >> address: 93010 >> address: Lugansk >> address: RUSSIAN FEDERATION >> > ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.

5 5

Re: [members-discuss] LIRs from Donetsk area?
by ripe＠ntx.ru 27 Jun '15

27 Jun '15

+1 Отправлено с устройства Samsung -------- Исходное сообщение -------- От: Sergey Myasoedov <kaa(a)net-art.cz> Дата: 27.06.2015 0:07 (GMT+02:00) Кому: members-discuss(a)ripe.net Тема: [members-discuss] LIRs from Donetsk area? Hi all, It may be looks like a Friday joke, but it is real: alloclist.txt: ru.dnr "Center of Internet services in DNR" 20150626 185.106.128.0/22 ALLOCATED PA 20150626 2a06:3dc0::/29 organisation: ORG-OISI2-RIPE org-name: "Center of Internet services in DNR" org-type: LIR address: 4, Lenina, Rubezhnoe, Luhansk reg., address: 93010 address: Lugansk address: RUSSIAN FEDERATION phone: +380986237344 e-mail: directory(a)dnr-online.net What the documents were provided for LIR registration? The certificate issued by Sealand Principality or what? Are there any kind of due diligence on the incoming documents? Human check? Not sure. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov ---- If you don't want to receive emails from the RIPE NCC members-discuss mailing list, please log in to your LIR Portal account and go to the general page: https://lirportal.ripe.net/general/ Click on "Edit my LIR details", under "Subscribed Mailing Lists". From here, you can add or remove addresses.

4 3

LIRs from Donetsk area?
by Sergey Myasoedov 27 Jun '15

27 Jun '15

Hi all, It may be looks like a Friday joke, but it is real: alloclist.txt: ru.dnr "Center of Internet services in DNR" 20150626 185.106.128.0/22 ALLOCATED PA 20150626 2a06:3dc0::/29 organisation: ORG-OISI2-RIPE org-name: "Center of Internet services in DNR" org-type: LIR address: 4, Lenina, Rubezhnoe, Luhansk reg., address: 93010 address: Lugansk address: RUSSIAN FEDERATION phone: +380986237344 e-mail: directory(a)dnr-online.net What the documents were provided for LIR registration? The certificate issued by Sealand Principality or what? Are there any kind of due diligence on the incoming documents? Human check? Not sure. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov

4 3

Re: [members-discuss] LIRs from Donetsk area?
by Alexander Zubkov 27 Jun '15

27 Jun '15

My point was not about this. There was complaints that RIPE NCC performing bad when registering LIR's. I just wanted to say that given that example, there is no reasons to complain on RIPE NCC in given aspect. Considering your question. As I know, Lugansk is not a part of Russia. It is not me, who have written such address, I do not why they have done it. More to say I found it confusing that it is in Lugansk, but states that it servicing DNR. But I have a little information about what interrelations they have. Do not want to justify somebody, but it is entirely possible that this is only option for them to receive mail in Lugansk. On 06/27/2015 01:17 AM, Yakimus // VOKS support wrote: > Hi, Alexander! > Sat, 27 Jun 2015 00:53:03 +0300: > > AZ> Isn't it postal address supplied by LIR almost in free form? > AZ> This can be absolutely legal Russian company with good > AZ> papers, which specified such postal address. > > Is there in real a village/town/city in RF, named Lugansk? > > address: 93010 > address: Lugansk > address: RUSSIAN FEDERATION >

3 2

[#VER-185-22767]: Re: NCC changing descr fields
by Служба п оддержки Flops.ru 05 Jun '15

05 Jun '15

3 2

Bots subscribed to the list
by Dominik Nowacki 03 Jun '15

03 Jun '15

Following bots are again subscribed to the list: registry(a)resilans.se<mailto:registry@resilans.se> support(a)flops.ru<mailto:support@flops.ru> Manager Hoster.KZ manager(a)hoster.kz<mailto:manager@hoster.kz> arcade solutions ag <support(a)arcade.ch> Following failed responses received: SYMPA <sympa(a)list2.orange.com> Your message for list 'rus-conf.ipregs' (attached below) was rejected. You are not allowed to send this message for the following reason: you are not allowed to perform this action. For further information, please contact rus-conf.ipregs-request(a)list2.orange.com<mailto:rus-conf.ipregs-request@list2.orange.com> -- Mail Delivery System do-not-reply(a)tickets.denit.net<mailto:do-not-reply@tickets.denit.net> I'm afraid to say that I was unable to deliver your email with the subject 'Re: [members-discuss] [#VER-185-22767]: Re: NCC changing descr fields'. None of the addresses which your message was addressed to matched one which I can accept e-mail for. Please retry your message or contact the system administrator for further information. -- Can anyone from RIPE deal with this, please? I really hate getting spammed every time I chose to send a mail to this discussion list! With Kind Regards, Dominik Nowacki Clouvider Limited is a limited company registered in England and Wales. Registered number: 08750969. Registered office: 88 Wood Street, London, United Kingdom, EC2V 7RS. Please note that Clouvider Limited may monitor email traffic data and also the content of email for the purposes of security and staff training. This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the intended recipient. If you do not believe you are the intended recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify abuse(a)clouvider.net<mailto:abuse@clouvider.net> of this e-mail immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. Clouvider Limited nor any of its employees therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please request a hard-copy version.

3 2

NCC changing descr fields
by Paul Civati 03 Jun '15

03 Jun '15

It seems as though someone has decided to run a process of 'tidying up' in the RIPE db by fiddling with descr fields. I've been informed that: === During one of our data consistency checks, we saw that the resource holder information for these resources is not consistent: x.x.x.0-y.y.y.255 We will therefore be updating the resource holder information in the RIPE database objects to <company> and ORG-xxxx-RIPE on 2015-06-08." === This is somewhat mysterious, vague and puzzling Confusing because all the relevant handle and organisation records point to the correct objects for this block. Upon asking NCC what they are doing, I'm told that the descr field is incorrect and will be amended, actually to remove from it "London". What on earth is the point of this whole exercise? This has generated confusion on my part and a waste of support resource in NCC to deal with my query. We already have admin, tech and org fields that point to the identifying organisation for the object but now someone has decided that the descr field must have duplicated information. The help section in whois mentions nothing about what data is to be in descr field, nor do I recall any mandate that it must be set to the name of the organisation. I can't be the only one confused by this vague change and asking NCC what is going on and why. Summary: seems a totally pointless waste of time. I guess someone in NCC was bored because I can't see any other point of this. Regards, Paul. -- Paul Civati <paul(at)racksense.com> 0870 321 2855 Rack Sense Ltd - Managed Service Provider - www.racksense.com

3 3

Re: [members-discuss] [ncc-announce] [GM] RIPE NCC Charging Scheme and ASNs
by Nick Hilliard 02 Apr '15

02 Apr '15

On 02/04/2015 15:09, Nigel Titley wrote: > There will therefore be two resolutions on charging at the GM: > > - Members will be asked to vote to approve or reject the Charging Scheme > 2016 that was published on 24 March: > https://www.ripe.net/lir-services/ncc/gm/may-2015/supporting-documents > > - Members will also be asked to vote to approve or reject a resolution > that would instantiate a EUR 50 charge per ASN Nigel, thanks for bringing this in as a voting item on the agenda. I believe this to be the best way to resolve the issue in the long term. There are ~27000 asns assigned by the RIPE NCC. Assuming a €50 annual charge, this will raise additional revenue of approx. €1.3m or around €120 per LIR. If the NCC membership votes in favour of a charge for ASNs, could you clarify whether this additional revenue will be: 1. used to drop the 2016 LIR charge from €1400 to around the €1300 mark, 2. retained as a surplus by the RIPE NCC, 3. returned to the membership by way of a future credit, as outlined in the last GM, or 4. something else. thanks, Nick

4 3