In https://ripe80.ripe.net/archives/chat/88/ 13:23 < luna> https://ipv4flagday.net/ 13:24 < chrbre_AS206228> https://github.com/ipviolations/ipv4flagday/issues Thanks, Luna and Christian, for pointing me at this, which is a fine idea. I’ve added an issue for false alarm when zone apex has no address record of either kind. Niall
Niall O'Reilly wrote on 15/05/2020 14:00:
In https://ripe80.ripe.net/archives/chat/88/
|13:23 < luna> https://ipv4flagday.net/ 13:24 < chrbre_AS206228> https://github.com/ipviolations/ipv4flagday/issues |
Thanks, Luna and Christian, for pointing me at this, which is a fine idea.
There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the page have committed to this plan. Nick
On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the page have committed to this plan.
That too! My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool. Niall
But only 2030, not any earlier ? We would need IPv6+ or something before that then ??? 🤣 Cheers Ray ________________________________ Kohteesta: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> henkilön Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> puolesta Lähetetty: perjantaina 15. toukokuuta 2020 klo 19.44 Vastaanottaja: RIPE IPv6-WG Aihe: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the page have committed to this plan.
That too! My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool. Niall
Hi, Is seems you are on the Board now -- Congratulations! -- so perhaps you can try to speed this thing up... :-))))))))) Maybe a round-table, a square-table or something like that with the (other) big guys...? Cheers, Carlos On Fri, 15 May 2020, Jetten Raymond wrote:
But only 2030, not any earlier ?
We would need IPv6+ or something before that then ??? ?
Cheers Ray
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Kohteesta: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> henkilön Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> puolesta Lähetetty: perjantaina 15. toukokuuta 2020 klo 19.44 Vastaanottaja: RIPE IPv6-WG Aihe: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day
On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the page have committed to this plan.
That too! My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool.
Niall
Thanks Carlos for the congrats, and to all of you who supported / voted a very big thank you! In the v6wg session @ripe80 and later on the list we had a discussion on "why it is so hard to implement v6" initiated by Wilhelm B. I hope we can continue these discussions, and see how to find solutions for these. I dont know what kind of table we need 😎,if at all, but i guess you all know and want that v6 would be the new normal. I cannot speed things up by myself, 😊 but i am convinced this workinggroup has potential. Thanks, Ray Lähetetty Outlook Mobilesta<https://aka.ms/blhgte> ________________________________ From: Carlos Friaças <cfriacas@fccn.pt> Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 8:38:50 PM To: Jetten Raymond <raymond.jetten@elisa.fi> Cc: RIPE IPv6-WG <ipv6-wg@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day Hi, Is seems you are on the Board now -- Congratulations! -- so perhaps you can try to speed this thing up... :-))))))))) Maybe a round-table, a square-table or something like that with the (other) big guys...? Cheers, Carlos On Fri, 15 May 2020, Jetten Raymond wrote:
But only 2030, not any earlier ?
We would need IPv6+ or something before that then ??? ?
Cheers Ray
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Kohteesta: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> henkilön Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> puolesta Lähetetty: perjantaina 15. toukokuuta 2020 klo 19.44 Vastaanottaja: RIPE IPv6-WG Aihe: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day
On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote:
There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the page have committed to this plan.
That too! My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool.
Niall
participants (4)
-
Carlos Friaças -
Jetten Raymond -
Niall O'Reilly -
Nick Hilliard