Thanks Carlos for the congrats, and to all of you who supported / voted a very big thank you!
In the v6wg session @ripe80 and later on the list we had a discussion on "why it is so hard to implement v6" initiated by Wilhelm B. I hope we can continue these discussions, and see how to find solutions for these.
I dont know what kind of table we need 😎,if at all, but i guess you all know and want that v6 would be the new normal.
I cannot speed things up by myself, 😊 but i am convinced this workinggroup has potential.
Thanks,
Ray
From: Carlos Friaças <cfriacas@fccn.pt>
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 8:38:50 PM
To: Jetten Raymond <raymond.jetten@elisa.fi>
Cc: RIPE IPv6-WG <ipv6-wg@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day
Hi,
Is seems you are on the Board now -- Congratulations! -- so perhaps you
can try to speed this thing up... :-)))))))))
Maybe a round-table, a square-table or something like that with the
(other) big guys...?
Cheers,
Carlos
On Fri, 15 May 2020, Jetten Raymond wrote:
> But only 2030, not any earlier ?
>
> We would need IPv6+ or something before that then ??? ?
>
> Cheers
> Ray
>
> ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> Kohteesta: ipv6-wg <ipv6-wg-bounces@ripe.net> henkilön Niall O'Reilly <niall.oreilly@ucd.ie> puolesta
> Lähetetty: perjantaina 15. toukokuuta 2020 klo 19.44
> Vastaanottaja: RIPE IPv6-WG
> Aihe: Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv4 Flag Day
>
> On 15 May 2020, at 15:40, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> > There doesn't seem to be any indication that the vendors named on the
> > page have committed to this plan.
>
> That too!
> My focus was on the usefulness of the test tool.
>
> Niall
>
>
>
>