>> Michel Py wrote:
>> Nevertheless, no matter how good the reasons, even tacitly allowing
>> /48s in the routing table does create a terrible precedent.
> Gert Doering wrote:
> Maybe. But I'm not so sure whether this is so terrible - if you do
> not want to see /48s, filter them out, and live with potentially
> non-perfect routing (to the aggregate and find the more-specific
> there).
I'm sorry, but what do you achieve in terms of multihoming doing this?
If you filter PA specific routes, the only aggregate you see in the DFZ
is that provider's block, effectively making the site singlehomed.
Michel.
