it's co-chair selection time!
My term as WG co-chair ends at RIPE80 or theresabouts. I will not be standing for another term. First of all, bringing in new and hopefully younger faces to freshen things up is long overdue. Second, I only volunteered to bootstrap the new WG. That has been completed. So it’s time to step away and let the WG find somebody else. There’s some info on WG co-chair responsibilities in RIPE692. Anyone interested in applying who wants more advice on what the job entails, likely time commitments and so on is welcome to contact Sandoche or myself. Or any other recent/current WG co-chair for that matter. I would also ask potential candidates to start a *new thread* -- eg "Your name for co-chair" or something like that -- when they post on the list so there are meaningful and relevant Subject: headers which make it easier to make a consensus judgement. It’ll save the current co-chairs reading every message on the mailing list to decide if they contain something in favour or against a particular candidate. This will also make it clearer for other members of the list to express their support (or not) for a candidate. Anyone can volunteer to become a co-chair and you can even nominate yourself. There’s no requirement to have N people nominating a candidate for them be considered for selection (for values of N > 1). Ideally, it would be good to be able to announce the new co-chair at RIPE80. Though that could be too short notice since the meeting’s just under 4 weeks away. If you think more time is needed to decide, please speak up. There’s no firm deadline and we should take our time about making this appointment - provided of course the new co-chair is in place in plenty of time for RIPE81. Although I think 4 weeks (ish) should be long enough to find a new co-chair, this is for the WG to decide too.
First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair! For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring. I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy. Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry. There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members. Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations. It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet. Sincerly, Peter
Am 20.04.2020 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>:
My term as WG co-chair ends at RIPE80 or theresabouts. I will not be standing for another term. First of all, bringing in new and hopefully younger faces to freshen things up is long overdue. Second, I only volunteered to bootstrap the new WG. That has been completed. So it’s time to step away and let the WG find somebody else.
There’s some info on WG co-chair responsibilities in RIPE692. Anyone interested in applying who wants more advice on what the job entails, likely time commitments and so on is welcome to contact Sandoche or myself. Or any other recent/current WG co-chair for that matter.
I would also ask potential candidates to start a *new thread* -- eg "Your name for co-chair" or something like that -- when they post on the list so there are meaningful and relevant Subject: headers which make it easier to make a consensus judgement. It’ll save the current co-chairs reading every message on the mailing list to decide if they contain something in favour or against a particular candidate. This will also make it clearer for other members of the list to express their support (or not) for a candidate.
Anyone can volunteer to become a co-chair and you can even nominate yourself. There’s no requirement to have N people nominating a candidate for them be considered for selection (for values of N > 1).
Ideally, it would be good to be able to announce the new co-chair at RIPE80. Though that could be too short notice since the meeting’s just under 4 weeks away. If you think more time is needed to decide, please speak up. There’s no firm deadline and we should take our time about making this appointment - provided of course the new co-chair is in place in plenty of time for RIPE81. Although I think 4 weeks (ish) should be long enough to find a new co-chair, this is for the WG to decide too. _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
Peter Steinhäuser, CEO embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64
Hi Peter, You have my support. Groet, Eric Best regards, Eric van Uden AVM ICT GmbH Country Manager Netherlands Mr. van Coothlaan 10 6602 GT Wijchen Nederland Phone +31 24 6485381 Mobile +31 622 948356 e.vanuden@avm.de Bezoek onze website op http://nl.avm.de/ , vind ons leuk op Facebook of bekijk onze Google +-pagina en Youtube-kanaal. AVM GmbH for International Communication Technology, Alt-Moabit 95, 10559 Berlin, Germany HRB 48220 AG Charlottenburg, CEO (Geschäftsführer): Johannes Nill Von: "Peter Steinhäuser" <ps@embedd.com> An: "IoT WG RIPE" <iot-wg@ripe.net> Datum: 22-04-2020 12:12 Betreff: Re: [iot-wg] it's co-chair selection time! Gesendet von: "iot-wg" <iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net> First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair! For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring. I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy. Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry. There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members. Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations. It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet. Sincerly, Peter Am 20.04.2020 um 18:44 schrieb Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>: My term as WG co-chair ends at RIPE80 or theresabouts. I will not be standing for another term. First of all, bringing in new and hopefully younger faces to freshen things up is long overdue. Second, I only volunteered to bootstrap the new WG. That has been completed. So it’s time to step away and let the WG find somebody else. There’s some info on WG co-chair responsibilities in RIPE692. Anyone interested in applying who wants more advice on what the job entails, likely time commitments and so on is welcome to contact Sandoche or myself. Or any other recent/current WG co-chair for that matter. I would also ask potential candidates to start a *new thread* -- eg "Your name for co-chair" or something like that -- when they post on the list so there are meaningful and relevant Subject: headers which make it easier to make a consensus judgement. It’ll save the current co-chairs reading every message on the mailing list to decide if they contain something in favour or against a particular candidate. This will also make it clearer for other members of the list to express their support (or not) for a candidate. Anyone can volunteer to become a co-chair and you can even nominate yourself. There’s no requirement to have N people nominating a candidate for them be considered for selection (for values of N > 1). Ideally, it would be good to be able to announce the new co-chair at RIPE80. Though that could be too short notice since the meeting’s just under 4 weeks away. If you think more time is needed to decide, please speak up. There’s no firm deadline and we should take our time about making this appointment - provided of course the new co-chair is in place in plenty of time for RIPE81. Although I think 4 weeks (ish) should be long enough to find a new co-chair, this is for the WG to decide too. _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg Peter Steinhäuser, CEO embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64 _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
On 2020-04-22 12:12, Peter Steinhäuser wrote:
For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring.
I support Peter's nomination for the position of IoT-wg co-chair. Kind regards, Jelte Jansen SIDN
Hello everybody, I am resending my application since I - shame on me - did not follow the recommendation of Jim to start a new e-mail thread with my application - as stated below I’m still learning but I’m eager to ;) First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair! For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring. I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy. Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry. There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members. Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations. It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet. Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser Peter Steinhäuser, CEO embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64 _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
I support Peter as co-chair. -- Töma On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:02 PM Peter Steinhäuser <ps@embedd.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am resending my application since I - shame on me - did not follow the recommendation of Jim to start a new e-mail thread with my application - as stated below I’m still learning but I’m eager to ;)
First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair!
For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring.
I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy.
Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry.
There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members.
Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations.
It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet.
Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser Peter Steinhäuser, CEO embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
Nobody asked you who you support, why do you spam the list. Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: iot-wg <iot-wg-bounces@ripe.net> on behalf of Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 6:01 PM To: Peter Steinhäuser <ps@embedd.com> Cc: IoT WG RIPE <iot-wg@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [iot-wg] Peter Steinhaeuser for co-chair I support Peter as co-chair. -- Töma On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 2:02 PM Peter Steinhäuser <ps@embedd.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am resending my application since I - shame on me - did not follow the recommendation of Jim to start a new e-mail thread with my application - as stated below I’m still learning but I’m eager to ;)
First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair!
For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring.
I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy.
Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry.
There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members.
Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations.
It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet.
Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser Peter Steinhäuser, CEO embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
On 22 Apr 2020, at 16:04, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
Nobody asked you who you support, why do you spam the list.
<WG Co-chair hat on> This is your final warning Elad. If you continue to mis-use this list and/or fail to follow etiquette, you will be moderated. Further (attempted) violations during or after a period of moderation will result in you being permanently removed from this list. I hope it won’t be necessary to apply these sanctions that. However they will happen if you continue to misbehave. The WG is in the process of selecting a new co-chair. This is done by a consensus decision that gets taken on this list. That process entails potential candidates volunteering for the position and members of the WG indicating on this list their support for those candidates. That was also explained in my email the other day which started this process. The WG’s co-chair selection process is documented here: https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/iot/internet-of-things-wg-chair-sel... Toma was perfectly entitled to expresss his opinion and to support Peter’s candidacy. As indeed anyone else would be entitled do for any of the candidates who decide to stand. Toma's mail to the list was not spam. It was in scope, appropriate and relevant. Unlike yours. Falsely accusing him of spamming the list -- and perhaps intimidating others from expressing support for potential co-chairs -- is grossly unacceptable behaviour. It will not be tolerated. If you need further guidance on this matter, contact me privately and don’t discuss it on this list.
I only want to point that it cannot be a final warning because there never was a first warning. I support Toma for co-chair! Respectfully, Elad ________________________________ From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2020 6:25 PM To: Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> Cc: IoT WG RIPE <iot-wg@ripe.net> Subject: trolliing the IoT WG list
On 22 Apr 2020, at 16:04, Elad Cohen <elad@netstyle.io> wrote:
Nobody asked you who you support, why do you spam the list.
<WG Co-chair hat on> This is your final warning Elad. If you continue to mis-use this list and/or fail to follow etiquette, you will be moderated. Further (attempted) violations during or after a period of moderation will result in you being permanently removed from this list. I hope it won’t be necessary to apply these sanctions that. However they will happen if you continue to misbehave. The WG is in the process of selecting a new co-chair. This is done by a consensus decision that gets taken on this list. That process entails potential candidates volunteering for the position and members of the WG indicating on this list their support for those candidates. That was also explained in my email the other day which started this process. The WG’s co-chair selection process is documented here: https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/iot/internet-of-things-wg-chair-sel... Toma was perfectly entitled to expresss his opinion and to support Peter’s candidacy. As indeed anyone else would be entitled do for any of the candidates who decide to stand. Toma's mail to the list was not spam. It was in scope, appropriate and relevant. Unlike yours. Falsely accusing him of spamming the list -- and perhaps intimidating others from expressing support for potential co-chairs -- is grossly unacceptable behaviour. It will not be tolerated. If you need further guidance on this matter, contact me privately and don’t discuss it on this list.
I also support Peter and for anybody who is not familiar with the process, I might point to https://www.ripe.net/participate/ripe/wg/iot/internet-of-things-wg-chair-sel...
On 22. Apr 2020, at 13:02, Peter Steinhäuser <ps@embedd.com> wrote:
For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring.
-- Wolfgang Tremmel Phone +49 69 1730902 0 | wolfgang.tremmel@de-cix.net Executive Directors: Harald A. Summa and Sebastian Seifert | Trade Registry: AG Cologne, HRB 51135 DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main | Germany | www.de-cix.net
I also support Peter for RIPE IoT WG Co-chair. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
Peter, I think you'd make a great chair! Eliot On 22.04.20 13:02, Peter Steinhäuser wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am resending my application since I - shame on me - did not follow the recommendation of Jim to start a new e-mail thread with my application - as stated below I’m still learning but I’m eager to ;)
First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair!
For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring.
I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy.
Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry.
There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members.
Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations.
It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet.
Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser *Peter Steinhäuser, CEO* embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64 _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net <mailto:iot-wg@ripe.net> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
Hi, I support Peter's candidacy for working group co-chair. With kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Ad Bresser On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 at 13:02, Peter Steinhäuser <ps@embedd.com> wrote:
Hello everybody,
I am resending my application since I - shame on me - did not follow the recommendation of Jim to start a new e-mail thread with my application - as stated below I’m still learning but I’m eager to ;)
First of all I want to thank Jim for his great work for this working group and his years commitment as a working group chair!
For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring.
I'm seriously concerned about the impact malicious IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. My goal in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy.
Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry.
There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members.
Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations.
It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet.
Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser *Peter Steinhäuser, CEO* embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg _______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
Dear collegues, first of all I want to thank Sandoch for his great work as a co-chair for this working group! It’s been a pleasure working with Sandoche in the recent years and I also greatly appreachiate his work also in the team creating the RIPE IoT BCOP document helping it towards pubication.. For the designation of a new working group co-chair I put my hat (again) into the ring. I'm seriously concerned about the impact compromised IoT devices will have on the internet's infrastructure. On of my goals in the working group is defining best practices and standards about how can be best dealt with IoT devices pro-actively to keep the attacks that are already onging and will come to happen under control. The RIPE-IoT BCOP document is a first result of the activities of vary talented members of this WG I had the pleasure to work together very closely. Besides that I want to work on providing players from the IoT industry with better practices and - if possible - technical solutions while working with regulators to create better standards that help providing security and privacy. With the upcoming support of IP for IoT connectivity - i.e. the thread protcol - I think this WG can work more closely with the other RIPE WGs as well. Coming from a home gateway/personal router/CPE background (DD-WRT / OpenWRT) such devices are for me potential gatekeepers that can play an important role in securing millions home small networks. Also ISP's should be brought on board, it's in their sole interest as well. To have an effect we need to try to gain a maximum traction in the industry. There are already activities (SPIN / IETF home gateway WG, etc.) in this field. As a working group chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation & Telcom Infrastructure Project - TIP) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for the open source projects in the prpl Foundation I also work on selecting security related technologies for adoption / funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members as well as in the TIP project where we contribute technology and solutions to the open coverge wireless WG. Being a RIPE member since years and becoming more and more familiar with the works of standardization organizations I am eager to learn more about the proceedings and how to better support the RIPE-community and other standardization organizations. It would be my pleasure to work closer with all of you for the better of the internet and would appreaciate you supporting me as a co-chait for this working group. Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser Peter Steinhäuser, CEO embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64
Dear collegues, I put my hat (again) into the ring and ask you to support me as a candiate for co-chairing this WG. I think that this WG is still trying to find it's place in the RIPE community, the overall acitivity level has beend a bit low. Of course the years of the pandemic and the lack of opportunities to meet in person were not helpful. Nevertheless it seems that IoT is still something that is often considered to live in the consumer space, and also many carriers currently seem to have other priorities. With the expanding support of IP for IoT connectivity - i.e. the Thread and Matter protcol - I think this WG can work more closely with the other RIPE WGs and should working on linkinf with other RIPE WGs and standardisation and industry entities to better understand what this RIPE WG can contribute. There are already activities (IETF home gateway WG, Telcom Infra Project) in this field and also carriers bit by bit seems to pay more attention to IoT. Industrial IoT is also getting traction and new technologies like LiFi are emerging. Such should also come this WG's attention and there's are strong tendency to move toward IP (in my understanding). As a WG chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation & Telcom Infrastructure Project - TIP) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for prplOS in the prpl Foundation I also propose technologies for adoption & funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members, as well as in the TIP project where we contribute technology and solutions to the Open Coverged Wireless WG (and recently started working on IoT integration as well). I would appreaciate your support for my standing for co-chair for this WG and supporting it's activities. I still think that this WG can make meaningful contributions - we had a good start with the BCOP document and it was a pleasure for me to work with the participating WG members. Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser
On 5/14/22 17:17, Peter Steinhäuser wrote:
Dear collegues,
I put my hat (again) into the ring and ask you to support me as a candiate for co-chairing this WG.
I think Peter would make a good WG co-chair, and support his nomination. Jelte
On 16 May 2022, at 08:21, Jelte via iot-wg <iot-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
I think Peter would make a good WG co-chair, and support his nomination.
<AOL Mode>Me too!</AOL Mode> Peter for new WG Co-chair.
+1 On 16.05.22 09:23, Jim Reid wrote:
On 16 May 2022, at 08:21, Jelte via iot-wg <iot-wg@ripe.net> wrote:
I think Peter would make a good WG co-chair, and support his nomination. <AOL Mode>Me too!</AOL Mode>
Peter for new WG Co-chair.
_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
Peace, I, too, support Peter for the IoT WG Chair position. -- Töma On Sat, May 14, 2022, 5:17 PM Peter Steinhäuser <ps@embedd.com> wrote:
Dear collegues,
I put my hat (again) into the ring and ask you to support me as a candiate for co-chairing this WG.
I think that this WG is still trying to find it's place in the RIPE community, the overall acitivity level has beend a bit low. Of course the years of the pandemic and the lack of opportunities to meet in person were not helpful. Nevertheless it seems that IoT is still something that is often considered to live in the consumer space, and also many carriers currently seem to have other priorities.
With the expanding support of IP for IoT connectivity - i.e. the Thread and Matter protcol - I think this WG can work more closely with the other RIPE WGs and should working on linkinf with other RIPE WGs and standardisation and industry entities to better understand what this RIPE WG can contribute.
There are already activities (IETF home gateway WG, Telcom Infra Project) in this field and also carriers bit by bit seems to pay more attention to IoT. Industrial IoT is also getting traction and new technologies like LiFi are emerging. Such should also come this WG's attention and there's are strong tendency to move toward IP (in my understanding).
As a WG chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation & Telcom Infrastructure Project - TIP) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as project manager for prplOS in the prpl Foundation I also propose technologies for adoption & funding by the prpl Foundation and it's members, as well as in the TIP project where we contribute technology and solutions to the Open Coverged Wireless WG (and recently started working on IoT integration as well).
I would appreaciate your support for my standing for co-chair for this WG and supporting it's activities. I still think that this WG can make meaningful contributions - we had a good start with the BCOP document and it was a pleasure for me to work with the participating WG members.
Sincerly, Peter Steinhaeuser_______________________________________________ iot-wg mailing list iot-wg@ripe.net https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-wg
participants (11)
-
Ad Bresser -
e.vanuden＠avm.de -
Elad Cohen -
Eliot Lear -
Jelte -
Jim Reid -
Michael Richardson -
Peter Steinhäuser -
Töma Gavrichenkov -
Wolfgang Tremmel -
Yurii Kargapolov