25 May
2016
25 May
'16
3:25 p.m.
On 25-05-16 15:15, Patrik Fältström wrote:
Although of course it is good if we also have consensus.
Just to clarify - there was definitely a reason I put all those modifiers in the phrase "possibly try to see if there is a consensus view". I don't see it as the job of the WG or the co-chairs to force a single shared view - only to articulate a common view in case there is one. Julf