On 25-05-16 15:15, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> Although of course it is good if we also have consensus.

Just to clarify - there was definitely a reason I put all those
modifiers in the phrase "possibly try to see if there is a
consensus view". I don't see it as the job of the WG or the
co-chairs to force a single shared view - only to articulate
a common view in case there is one.

    Julf