- BCOP - mailman.ripe.net

BCOP TF meeting at RIPE70 in Amsterdam
by Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si 16 Apr '15

16 Apr '15

Dear BCOP community, RIPE70 is fast approaching and we would like to ask all fellow BCOP-ers to come forward if you have any updates on work done from previous meeting and also to present any new ideas that might emerge meantime on new BCOP documents that people wants to write and work on. As we saw there was some work on the list done for "IPv6 for small access providers" and we are not sure if this continued offline, nevertheless we encourage the authors to give us an update what's going on at the meeting. The same goes for all work that should be in progress - we would love to hear how things are progressing. Please send ideas/requests to this list or to Benno or myself directly, we need to put together an agenda for this upcoming meeting. See you in Amsterdam, Benno and Jan

1 0

Some test results and suggestions to IPv6 Troubleshooting
by 朱彥如 08 Apr '15

08 Apr '15

I have setup IPv6 environment and use test-v6.com to make some tests. I have some suggestions according to my test results: 1. In section 6, for the example result for “624-6to4”, I suggestion to use <2002:c000:0201::c000:0201> for the IPv6 address, instead of original <2001:db8::1>. <2002:c000:0201::c000:0201> is derived from “2002::/16+ <192.0.2.1>”, which I think is more easily understood by users. 2. In section 6, Interpretation for “624-6to4”, I have questions about the sentence: “Any web site that has an IPv6 presence, will be reached using 6to4 instead of native IPv4” I use win 7 with only IPv4 address configured, and thus 6to4 works. Then, I add an IPv6 default route to 6to4 relay router (anycast). The test result show that * IPv4 is preferred rather than Ipv6 6to4 (Only when connecting to IPv6-only servers, IPv6 6to4 will be used) * The test result of using test-v6.com show 624 (Help desk code) So, I think the interpretation does not match the real condition. The following is my test result and give you as a reference (if gif can be accepted and shown): [cid:image001.jpg@01D06BAB.3047DCE0] [cid:image002.png@01D06BAB.3047DCE0] Regards Yann-Ju ChungHwa Telecom. Co. Please be advised that this email message (including any attachments) contains confidential information and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy this message and all attachments from your system and do not further collect, process, or use them. Chunghwa Telecom and all its subsidiaries and associated companies shall not be liable for the improper or incomplete transmission of the information contained in this email nor for any delay in its receipt or damage to your system. If you are the intended recipient, please protect the confidential and/or personal information contained in this email with due care. Any unauthorized use, disclosure or distribution of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited. Also, please self-inspect attachments and hyperlinks contained in this email to ensure the information security and to protect personal information.

1 0

IPv6 troubleshooting for helpdesks document is now RIPE-631
by Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si 05 Mar '15

05 Mar '15

Dear RIPE BCOP community, With great pleasure we can announce that one of our first BCOPs in the works was few days ago published as RIPE-631 https://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-631 Many thnx for all suggestions, comments and support during the work and I hope this document will be of much use to those operators, who are implementing IPv6 towards their residential customers (and also everyone else with similar task). With this document published I would like to encourage you all to continue the work on other documents that are currently active and also others, that we heard about during our last BCOP TF meeting. RIPE70 meeting in May is near and I hope for some advancement in all other documents in the queue so we can talk about some good stuff in Amsterdam! Cheers and thnx, Jan Zorz

1 0

Re: [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
by d.baeza＠tvt-datos.es 04 Jan '15

04 Jan '15

Hi All, In what ended that? Regards, -Daniel > Just to follow up on the question I just asked following the BCOP > draft on troubleshooting IPv6 for residential providers, should we > write a companion document focused on small providers that explains > how to deploy IPv6? > > I am happy to start writing, would anyone like to help? > > Cheers, > -w

1 0

anti-spoofing document
by Mikael Abrahamsson 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Hi, I keep running into people who have never heard of the excellent document that Torbjörn Eklöv has created over time. It came out of work to create requirements and certification for access networks, one large reason was to assure a secure end user connection that didn't have MITM and spoofing problems. The main site is here: http://secureenduserconnection.se/ Direct link to the current version of the document: http://secureenduserconnection.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/SEC-Secure-End… I recommend everybody looking for information and requirements on how to create a secure network to read this document. It's very comprehensive. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike(a)swm.pp.se

3 2

IPv6 troubleshooting for helpdesk document - feedback from RIPE IPv6 WG
by Jan Zorz ＠ go6.si 12 Nov '14

12 Nov '14

Dear BCOP community, Just a heads-up - we presented this document at RIPE IPv6 WG, asking for technical feedback and after some discussion the co-chairs decided to open a 2 weeks window for the community to come back with any possible comments and then issue a last call. I think we should do the same here. I know there were no objections and good sense of support and consensus in the room, but if we are doing it in cooperation with other WGs, then we need to adapt with the timings. So, still time for last comments or feedback. https://www.ripe.net/ripe/groups/tf/bcop/ipv6-troubleshooting-for-residenti… Cheers and thnx, Jan Zorz

1 0

Re: [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
by 马严 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

1 0

Re: [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
by 马严 11 Nov '14

11 Nov '14

1 0

IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
by William Waites 10 Nov '14

10 Nov '14

Just to follow up on the question I just asked following the BCOP draft on troubleshooting IPv6 for residential providers, should we write a companion document focused on small providers that explains how to deploy IPv6? I am happy to start writing, would anyone like to help? Cheers, -w

6 9

Re: [bcop] IPv6 deployment for small residential providers
by 马严 04 Nov '14

04 Nov '14

1 0