- BCOP - mailman.ripe.net

BCOP Task Force RIPE 86 - Best Operational Practices to Survive Natural Disasters or War
by Alena Muravska 19 May '24

19 May '24

Dear Colleagues, Following up from the past week's BCOP Task Force session at the RIPE 86 Meeting, I would like to report that we have completed forming a group of volunteers who will conduct series of interviews with Ukrainian operators to record their experience of running networks under extreme conditions of war. This will become a basis for a future document, current working title of which is Best Operational Practices to Survive Natural Disasters or War. We will be reporting about our progress on this mailing list and at RIPE Meetings. Kind regards, Alena Muravska

3 5

BCOP TF agenda published for RIPE 86 in Rotterdam
by Benno Overeinder 11 May '23

11 May '23

Hi all, The agenda for the BCOP TF is published on the RIPE 86 Meeting Plan, https://ripe86.ripe.net/programme/meeting-plan/bcop-tf/. Monday, 22 May 17:30 - 18:30 (UTC+2) Chaired By: Benno Overeinder, Jan Žorž A. Opening, Administrative, Global Activities [5 min] B. RIPE DNS Resolver Task Force Recommendations - Update [10 min] Shane Kerr C. Identifying and Documenting Best Practices to Survive Natural Disasters or War: Call for Action [40 min] Alena Muravska D. Open Microphone and Closing [5 min] See you all on Monday! Jan and Benno

1 0

BCOP TF meeting at RIPE86 in Rotterdam
by Jan Zorz - Go6 26 Apr '23

26 Apr '23

Dear BCOP community, We are now planning the agenda for BCOP TF meeting in Rotterdam. Any ideas or suggestions that you would like to put on the agenda and ask the community if they would help you with? Cheers, Benno and Jan

1 0

A question about RIPE-690
by Xuo Guoto 23 Jun '22

23 Jun '22

Hello all, I have a question about RIPE-690. In section 4.1.1 it says: <quote> Using a /64 prefix from a dedicated pool of IPv6 prefixes is the most common scenario and currently the best practice. A separate block of IPv6 space is allocated for the WAN links to the end customer CPEs, so that when CPE connects to the network and performs router discovery, a /64 prefix is used to number both ends of the connection. </quote> My question is that: Is the /64 prefix common for all WAN links or a separate /64 prefix is to be allotted for each WAN link? It may be obvious, but from reading the docs its not clear for me. I understand that for PD it has to be a separate prefix for each customer CPE. Apologies if this is not the right forum for asking this question. X.

3 3

Meeting of BCOP TF in Berlin @RIPE84
by Jan Zorz - Go6 26 Apr '22

26 Apr '22

Dear BCOP community, There is a possibility for BCOP TF to meet at RIPE84 in Berlin if there's interest from the community and we have at least 2 or 3 items on the agenda. We did not meet during online meetings as we felt that this TF should meet in-person and discuss how we can help each other document bect operational practices together - and now it's time again. Any ideas, proposals, work in progress? Maybe we should also discuss how to document best practices in building resilient network infrastructure that would work well during natural disasters or during the war... Cheers, Benno and Jan RIPE BCOP TF chairs

5 7

New BCOP
by Kai Bojens 15 Oct '19

15 Oct '19

Good morning, after the talk "How to Detect that Your Domains are Being Abused for ..." (which was pretty good btw) it was said that there would be a small group working on a new BCOP paper in regard to the presented topic. Would it be possible to take parts of the discussion to this mailing list? I found this topic to be very interesting and would like to follow this topic :) with best regards Kai Bojens -- Artfiles New Media GmbH | Zirkusweg 1 | 20359 Hamburg Tel: 040 - 32 02 72 90 | Fax: 040 - 32 02 72 95 E-Mail: support(a)artfiles.de | Web: http://www.artfiles.de Geschäftsführer: Harald Oltmanns | Tim Evers Eingetragen im Handelsregister Hamburg - HRB 81478

3 2

presentation "How to Detect that Your Domains are Being Abused for ..." is uploaded
by Benno Overeinder 14 Oct '19

14 Oct '19

The BCOP TF presentation "How to Detect that Your Domains are Being Abused for ..." by Karl Lovink is uploaded to the RIPE website. Best regards, -- Benno -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

1 0

RIPE 79 BCOP TF Agenda, Monday 14 October, 18:00-19:00
by Benno Overeinder 10 Oct '19

10 Oct '19

Hi all, For the upcoming RIPE 79 meeting, the BCOP TF meeting is scheduled for Monday evening, 18:00 to 19:00. The agenda for the BCOP TF meeting is: A. Opening, Administrative, Global Activities [5 min] B. How to Detect that Your Domains are Being Abused for ... -- Detecting Phishing [50 min] Karl Lovink, Belastingdienst C. Open Microphone and Closing [5 min] Cheers, -- Benno & Jan -- Benno J. Overeinder NLnet Labs https://www.nlnetlabs.nl/

1 0

Initiative to create a RIPE BCOP discussion document on proactively mitigating IoT attacks in CPE
by sandoche Balakrichenan 17 Jun '19

17 Jun '19

Dear all, The origin for this initiative came from the ICANN SSAC document on DNS and IoT : https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/sac-105-en.pdf As RIPE IoT chairs, we asked (in the RIPE IoT mailing list) whether we should prepare a Best Current Operational Practice (BCOP) document in RIPE scope for proactively mitigating IoT attacks. From both the Academy and the Industry, we got interests to contribute to this work. Possible contributors name can be found at the end of this mail: Thanks for your input on how to proceed further: 1. Do you think the topic is useful for the RIPE community? If yes, any guidance on how to proceed further will be appreciated. 2. Should this discussion be initiated in the RIPE IoT WG and not in the BCOP task force? 3. Anyone in this mailing list would be interested in contributing or provided references to people who will be interested to contribute? People who have already expressed interest in contributing: *From the Academy: * 1. Andrzej Duda (http://duda.imag.fr/) 2. Maciej Korczynski (http://mkorczynski.com/) *From the Industry:* 1. Ad Bresser (SPIN product manager) 2. Eliott Lear (CISCO) 3. Jacques Latour (CIRA - The Canadian Internet registry) 4. Peter Steinhauser (Embedd.com) 5. Possiblity from CZNIC (Czech Internet registry) who are involved in Turris router project Sandoche.

4 4

BCOP about CPE minimum security requirements
by JORDI PALET MARTINEZ 21 May '19

21 May '19

Hi all, Here are the links about the document I mention yesterday in the meeting, regarding the "Minimum security requirements for CPEs": https://www.lacnog.net/docs/lac-bcop-1 https://www.m3aawg.org/CPESecurityBP Also, the other relevant document "IPv6-only CPEs with IPv4-as-a-Service": https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8585/ Regards, Jordi ********************************************** IPv4 is over Are you ready for the new Internet ? http://www.theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

1 0