Hi everyone, I hope you're all doing well. We've made some updates to the charter based on our last meeting's discussion and the feedback we received. We tried to incorporate everyone's suggestions as best as we could. Please take a few minutes to look over the revised charter. We would like to get your feedback until 30th of August. - snip - The Security Working Group is committed to fostering collaboration, sharing best practices, and addressing security challenges within the RIPE community. The primary objective of the WG is to enhance the security, resilience, and stability of the Internet infrastructure within our region. Tackling abuse of Internet infrastructure and resources is a core goal of the WG, as well as: - Collaborating with stakeholders to develop and advocate for best practices, guidelines, and standards for securing Internet resources - Facilitating information sharing and cooperation among relevant entities - Providing education, training, and outreach initiatives to raise awareness of security issues and promote best practices adoption - snap - Kind regards, Brian, Tobias and Markus
Hello Markus and all, Thanks for sharing … This is very timely for me as I have been trying to work on definitions for the following words: “security", “resilience" and "stability of the "Internet". The RIPE NCC uses these words in its missions and strategic document, but I would like to have the definitions in a published glossary somewhere. This might seem like an easy task but it gets very nuanced very quickly as you add complexity, so getting the basics right from the start makes positioning much easier. Thoughts, pointers and links are very welcomed. Cheers Hisham
On 29 Jul 2024, at 1:59 PM, Markus de Brün <markus@mxdomain.de> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I hope you're all doing well.
We've made some updates to the charter based on our last meeting's discussion and the feedback we received. We tried to incorporate everyone's suggestions as best as we could. Please take a few minutes to look over the revised charter. We would like to get your feedback until 30th of August.
- snip -
The Security Working Group is committed to fostering collaboration, sharing best practices, and addressing security challenges within the RIPE community. The primary objective of the WG is to enhance the security, resilience, and stability of the Internet infrastructure within our region. Tackling abuse of Internet infrastructure and resources is a core goal of the WG, as well as:
- Collaborating with stakeholders to develop and advocate for best practices, guidelines, and standards for securing Internet resources - Facilitating information sharing and cooperation among relevant entities - Providing education, training, and outreach initiatives to raise awareness of security issues and promote best practices adoption
- snap -
Kind regards, Brian, Tobias and Markus ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/wg-chairs.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
Hi Markus, This looks ok. The section on policy development has been removed from this version of the charter, I'm guessing after the discussion in Krakow. Do you have a short summary to outline why this section was dropped? The 12,500 words in the steno logs (https://ripe88.ripe.net/archives/steno/22/) are longer than my attention-span-of-a-mosquito brain is easily able to digest. Nick Markus de Brün wrote on 29/07/2024 11:59:
Hi everyone,
I hope you're all doing well.
We've made some updates to the charter based on our last meeting's discussion and the feedback we received. We tried to incorporate everyone's suggestions as best as we could. Please take a few minutes to look over the revised charter. We would like to get your feedback until 30th of August.
- snip -
The Security Working Group is committed to fostering collaboration, sharing best practices, and addressing security challenges within the RIPE community. The primary objective of the WG is to enhance the security, resilience, and stability of the Internet infrastructure within our region. Tackling abuse of Internet infrastructure and resources is a core goal of the WG, as well as:
- Collaborating with stakeholders to develop and advocate for best practices, guidelines, and standards for securing Internet resources - Facilitating information sharing and cooperation among relevant entities - Providing education, training, and outreach initiatives to raise awareness of security issues and promote best practices adoption
- snap -
Kind regards, Brian, Tobias and Markus ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/anti-abuse-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
Hi Nick, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. The section on policy development was removed from the charter because there was a general consensus that the document was too lengthy, with too many detailed points and enumerations. We decided to shorten the entire charter, and as part of that, we omitted the section on policy development since it does not need to be explicitly mentioned. Most working group charters, including our current one, do not specifically reference policy development. However, this does not mean that the working group is excluded from developing policies. There was some discussion around the idea of exempting this WG from policy-making, but our current RIPE Co-Chair, Niall, expressed that he would not want to lose this WG as a potential vehicle for policy development. I hope this helps clarify things! Best regards, Markus On 01.08.24 17:00, Nick Hilliard wrote:
Hi Markus,
This looks ok. The section on policy development has been removed from this version of the charter, I'm guessing after the discussion in Krakow. Do you have a short summary to outline why this section was dropped? The 12,500 words in the steno logs (https://ripe88.ripe.net/archives/steno/22/) are longer than my attention-span-of-a-mosquito brain is easily able to digest.
Nick
Markus de Brün wrote on 29/07/2024 11:59:
Hi everyone,
I hope you're all doing well.
We've made some updates to the charter based on our last meeting's discussion and the feedback we received. We tried to incorporate everyone's suggestions as best as we could. Please take a few minutes to look over the revised charter. We would like to get your feedback until 30th of August.
- snip -
The Security Working Group is committed to fostering collaboration, sharing best practices, and addressing security challenges within the RIPE community. The primary objective of the WG is to enhance the security, resilience, and stability of the Internet infrastructure within our region. Tackling abuse of Internet infrastructure and resources is a core goal of the WG, as well as:
- Collaborating with stakeholders to develop and advocate for best practices, guidelines, and standards for securing Internet resources - Facilitating information sharing and cooperation among relevant entities - Providing education, training, and outreach initiatives to raise awareness of security issues and promote best practices adoption
- snap -
Kind regards, Brian, Tobias and Markus ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/anti-abuse-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
Markus de Brün wrote on 28/08/2024 10:40:
Apologies for the delay in getting back to you.
The section on policy development was removed from the charter because there was a general consensus that the document was too lengthy, with too many detailed points and enumerations. We decided to shorten the entire charter, and as part of that, we omitted the section on policy development since it does not need to be explicitly mentioned. Most working group charters, including our current one, do not specifically reference policy development.
ok great thanks, that clarifies things. The proposed new charter looks fine to go ahead. Nick
participants (3)
-
hmi＠ripe.net -
Markus de Brün -
Nick Hilliard