Abuse-C attributes - required e-mail address contact method.
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/8541f181264bb643d52b70eb9d4146d4.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hello, The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field. Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system) in the abuse attribute to ensure that we are able to properly manage and prioritise abuse complaints. If we have the web-form listed as the abuse contact we are able to maximise appropriate abuse handling measures to prevent misuse of our network and thereby ensure an optimum experience for all complainants. Is this a view that is help by others? Thanks & regards Jonathan Gist Jonathan Gist | Engineering Support & IP Address Management Virgin Media | Fountain Court, St Mellons, Cardiff, CF3 0FB M 07866 722641 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail? Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun. This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system: its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract. Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7464051f6e3699c7fe501681b53d8c48.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Not exactly a best practice. There are several best practices M3AAWG has worked on to efficiently manage abuse desk email tickets, you might try those. In any case most abuse complaints come in through feedback loops. Manual abuse complaints are few and far between, comparatively speaking. On Mar 13, 2015 9:07 PM, "Gist, Jonathan" <Jonathan.Gist@virginmedia.co.uk> wrote:
Hello,
The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field.
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system) in the abuse attribute to ensure that we are able to properly manage and prioritise abuse complaints. If we have the web-form listed as the abuse contact we are able to maximise appropriate abuse handling measures to prevent misuse of our network and thereby ensure an optimum experience for all complainants.
Is this a view that is help by others?
Thanks & regards
Jonathan Gist
Jonathan Gist | Engineering Support & IP Address Management *Virgin Media* |* Fountain Court, St Mellons, Cardiff, CF3 0FB* M 07866 722641
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system: its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/963b28dee625b98dba5e4f4fb1a82400.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi,
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system) in the abuse attribute to ensure that we are able to properly manage and prioritise abuse complaints. If we have the web-form listed as the abuse contact we are able to maximise appropriate abuse handling measures to prevent misuse of our network and thereby ensure an optimum experience for all complainants.
But how would 'automated systems' then contact Virgin? I do not mind adding a TXT field, but i would still want to keep the e-mail address as a required field. Filling in a form for abuse would (for me) adds a reason not to send it, as its mostly more hassle then its worth ;) Also some reporters like to be anonymous with their e-mail accounts. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Bart Vrancken, Engineer BIT BV | bart@bit.nl | +31 318 648688 Kvk: 09090351 | CROS-RIPE | GPG 3A99BD6E
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/963b28dee625b98dba5e4f4fb1a82400.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi,
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system) in the abuse attribute to ensure that we are able to properly manage and prioritise abuse complaints. If we have the web-form listed as the abuse contact we are able to maximise appropriate abuse handling measures to prevent misuse of our network and thereby ensure an optimum experience for all complainants.
But how would 'automated systems' then contact Virgin? I do not mind adding a TXT field, but i would still want to keep the e-mail address as a required field. Filling in a form for abuse would (for me) adds a reason not to send it, as its mostly more hassle then its worth Also some reporters like to be anonymous with their e-mail accounts. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Bart Vrancken, Engineer BIT BV | bart@bit.nl | +31 318 648688 Kvk: 09090351 | CROS-RIPE | GPG 3A99BD6E
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/fcc7b58a306a02e8bbed2a2a08c64909.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:18:17PM +0000, Gist, Jonathan wrote:
The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field.
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system)
I would not support such a change, at least not without a *well defined* format for such web forms. On the reporting side of abuse, it is just way too much work to figure out how particular ISPs expect to receive abuse reports, offloading half the work of abuse handling to the reporter. (I report quite a lot of abuse, but I refuse to do anything but e-mail, because it is just too much work for me - it's your customers, they are giving *you* money, their abuse should not cost *me* extra time). Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/c792a88f263315384c2fbcf76b1babaa.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:03:25 +0100 Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:18:17PM +0000, Gist, Jonathan wrote:
The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field. Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system)
I would not support such a change, at least not without a *well defined* format for such web forms. On the reporting side of abuse, it is just way too much work to figure out how particular ISPs expect to receive abuse reports, offloading half the work of abuse handling to the reporter. (I report quite a lot of abuse, but I refuse to do anything but e-mail, because it is just too much work for me - it's your customers, they are giving *you* money, their abuse should not cost *me* extra time). Gert Doering
+1 Certain types of ISP's wish to reduce their costs of flooding the Internet. If they can force you to have to jump through their website hoops, they can make it so challenging and difficult to report their abuse, that it will become impossible. Just to define an acceptable standard for any such web reporting system would be an immense challenge in itself. Email is simply the easiest and most direct way to communicate and to receive notice of abuse complaints. Possibly I may be bold and suggest that virginmedia rather installs an email ticketing system and allocates resources to managing their abuse complaints than attempting to propose solutions that are divisive and non productive. my 2c (we have high inflation so 1c just does not cut it any longer...) ac
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/a0bc4d3b9487ff94ae175fa156dc314e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On 3/13/2015 11:35 PM, andre@ox.co.za wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 17:03:25 +0100 Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:18:17PM +0000, Gist, Jonathan wrote:
The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field. Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system)
I would not support such a change, at least not without a *well defined* format for such web forms. On the reporting side of abuse, it is just way too much work to figure out how particular ISPs expect to receive abuse reports, offloading half the work of abuse handling to the reporter. (I report quite a lot of abuse, but I refuse to do anything but e-mail, because it is just too much work for me - it's your customers, they are giving *you* money, their abuse should not cost *me* extra time). Gert Doering +5 Arnold +1
Certain types of ISP's wish to reduce their costs of flooding the Internet. If they can force you to have to jump through their website hoops, they can make it so challenging and difficult to report their abuse, that it will become impossible.
Just to define an acceptable standard for any such web reporting system would be an immense challenge in itself.
Email is simply the easiest and most direct way to communicate and to receive notice of abuse complaints.
Possibly I may be bold and suggest that virginmedia rather installs an email ticketing system and allocates resources to managing their abuse complaints than attempting to propose solutions that are divisive and non productive.
my 2c (we have high inflation so 1c just does not cut it any longer...)
ac
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/9861f916467631e316a71a2f673c0a47.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
* Gert Doering <gert@space.net> [2015-03-13 17:12]:
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system)
I would not support such a change, at least not without a *well defined* format for such web forms.
On the reporting side of abuse, it is just way too much work to figure out how particular ISPs expect to receive abuse reports, offloading half the work of abuse handling to the reporter.
(I report quite a lot of abuse, but I refuse to do anything but e-mail, because it is just too much work for me - it's your customers, they are giving *you* money, their abuse should not cost *me* extra time).
I completely agree. Before such a change could be implemented you would need a well defined format for *automated* abuse reports via web form (or rather web API). Regards Sebastian -- GPG Key: 0x93A0B9CE (F4F6 B1A3 866B 26E9 450A 9D82 58A2 D94A 93A0 B9CE) 'Are you Death?' ... IT'S THE SCYTHE, ISN'T IT? PEOPLE ALWAYS NOTICE THE SCYTHE. -- Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/777590a58c654afbd77f0059808802ae.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Friday 13 March 2015 16.18, Gist, Jonathan wrote:
Hello,
The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field.
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system) in the abuse attribute to ensure that we are able to properly manage and prioritise abuse complaints. If we have the web-form listed as the abuse contact we are able to maximise appropriate abuse handling measures to prevent misuse of our network and thereby ensure an optimum experience for all complainants.
Request denied! It costs money to deal with abuse complains, that is true. But to save some of this Virgin could do : - reduce spam and fishing from virgin addresses - effectivly hunt down and cut off abusing customer. As regards to cost of running an abusedesk; thats part of the business. If virgin want to save money, then they should sell the Internet activities and start ( coillecting stamps ?) Running any form of business requires responsibility. An functioning abusedesk is one function of an Internet provider. My 5c
Is this a view that is help by others?
Thanks & regards
Jonathan Gist Jonathan Gist | Engineering Support & IP Address Management Virgin Media | Fountain Court, St Mellons, Cardiff, CF3 0FB M 07866 722641
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Save Paper - Do you really need to print this e-mail?
Visit www.virginmedia.com for more information, and more fun.
This email and any attachments are or may be confidential and legally privileged and are sent solely for the attention of the addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it from your system: its use, disclosure or copying is unauthorised. Statements and opinions expressed in this email may not represent those of Virgin Media. Any representations or commitments in this email are subject to contract.
Registered office: Media House, Bartley Wood Business Park, Hook, Hampshire, RG27 9UP Registered in England and Wales with number 2591237
-- Peter Håkanson There's never money to do it right, but always money to do it again ... and again ... and again ... and again. ( Det är billigare att göra rätt. Det är dyrt att laga fel. )
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/71d8bf1aa43d8a3d50564475369f935c.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Gist, Jonathan wrote:
Hello, [...] Is this a view that is help by others?
Definitely *not* by me. -Wilfried.
Thanks & regards
Jonathan Gist
Jonathan Gist | Engineering Support & IP Address Management *Virgin Media* |* Fountain Court, St Mellons, Cardiff, CF3 0FB* M 07866 722641
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3d19521568460391247c3b9fa1e1e595.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Am 2015-03-13 um 16:18 schrieb Gist, Jonathan:
Is this a view that is help by others?
Not by me. Just feed email to your system ... -- j.hofmüller Optimism doesn't alter the laws of physics. - Subcommander T'Pol
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3b6370da06b1634335bad2ad21800916.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 03:18:17PM +0000, Gist, Jonathan wrote: Hi
Is this a view that is help by others?
No, not by me. Piotr -- gucio -> Piotr Strzyżewski E-mail: Piotr.Strzyzewski@polsl.pl
![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/682a8a94b226f4da84766aea3e0b368f.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Jonathan, Thanks for your mail. On 13/03/2015 15:18, Gist, Jonathan wrote:
Hello,
The RIPE policy around the abuse-c attribute requires the presence of an e-mail address, which is asked to be used by subscribers wishing to report abuse incidents. This contact method is resource intensive and Virgin Media would like to propose a change to the policy to remove the requirement for an e-mail address contact field.
Virgin Media would like to specify virginmedia.com/netreport (a web-form that feeds an abuse case management system) in the abuse attribute to ensure that we are able to properly manage and prioritise abuse complaints. If we have the web-form listed as the abuse contact we are able to maximise appropriate abuse handling measures to prevent misuse of our network and thereby ensure an optimum experience for all complainants.
Is this a view that is help by others?
I think that you've had some response from the community over the last few days which will hopefully be useful. If you would still like to investigate this amendment to the policy, or consider other options, then the Working Group Chairs are happy to help in any way we can. Thanks, Brian Co-Chair, RIPE AA-WG
participants (12)
-
andre@ox.co.za
-
Arnold
-
Bart Vrancken
-
Brian Nisbet
-
Gert Doering
-
Gist, Jonathan
-
Jogi Hofmüller
-
peter h
-
Piotr Strzyzewski
-
Sebastian Wiesinger
-
Suresh Ramasubramanian
-
Wilfried Woeber