So the RIR has absolutely no role in maintaining say IRR data? I agree validating LOAs and such for routing changes would be on providers. Though if the changes were to be made in IRR data who would validate it? --srs From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Date: Friday, 3 January 2020 at 9:32 PM To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com> Cc: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com>, Sergey Myasoedov <sergey@devnull.ru>, Nikolas Pediaditis <npediaditi@ripe.net>, anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net> Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia Hi, On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 03:55:07PM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
I am not a member. However, the increase in such incidents and the risk of regulators or lawsuits occurring mean that RIPE NCC does need to perform more due diligence than would be consistent with a ???we are not the internet police??? position.
On everything registry-related, the NCC does huge amounts of due dilligence. This has nothing to do whatsoever with *routing* police'ing, though. Gert Doering -- member, and occasionally on the wrong end of the due dilligence -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279