So the RIR has absolutely no role in maintaining say IRR data?  I agree validating LOAs and such for routing changes would be on providers.  Though if the changes were to be made in IRR data who would validate it?

--srs

From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Date: Friday, 3 January 2020 at 9:32 PM
To: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@blacknight.com>, Sergey Myasoedov <sergey@devnull.ru>, Nikolas Pediaditis <npediaditi@ripe.net>, anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net <anti-abuse-wg@ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [anti-abuse-wg] [routing-wg] An arrest in Russia

Hi,

On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 03:55:07PM +0000, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> I am not a member. However, the increase in such incidents and the risk of regulators or lawsuits occurring mean that RIPE NCC does need to perform more due diligence than would be consistent with a ???we are not the internet police??? position.

On everything registry-related, the NCC does huge amounts of due dilligence.

This has nothing to do whatsoever with *routing* police'ing, though.

Gert Doering
        -- member, and occasionally on the wrong end of the due dilligence
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                      Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14        Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                 HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444         USt-IdNr.: DE813185279