You're kind of like blind now. It's because they evade taxes. No other reason. On 07/01/16 15:12, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Jun 30, "Ronald F. Guilmette" <rfg@tristatelogic.com> wrote:
And conversely, why did RIPE, and/or any of its LIRs, deem it appropriate to grant one of RIPE's limited supply of AS numbers to a self-identified *Belizian* company, particularly when this was the company's first, last, and *only* AS number? Because, as you pointed out, they have a network presence in the RIPE region.
Wouldn't a LACNIC-issued AS number have done just as well? If not, why not? I am not familiar with LACNIC policies.
-- Kind regards, CTO at *Foton Telecom CJSC* Tel.: +7 (499) 679-99-99 AS42861 on PeeringDB <http://as42861.peeringdb.com/>, Qrator <https://radar.qrator.net/as42861>, BGP.HE.NET <http://bgp.he.net/AS42861> http://ipv6actnow.org/