Which, considering what nobody implies, is a lovely way to circumvent the grand intentions this proposal has. Talk about leading horses to water versus making them drink --srs (htc one x) On Oct 22, 2012 1:37 PM, "Jørgen Hovland" <jorgen@hovland.cx> wrote:
Hello,
I think you might be misunderstanding how mandatory contact information works. As you can see, the mandatory e-mail field is set to nobody@accelerated.de When abuse-c e-mail will become mandatory, their abuse-c e-mail will continue to be nobody@accelerated.de.
On 10/22/12 09:58, U.Mutlu wrote:
As everybody knows, the proposal "Abuse Contact Management in the RIPE NCC Database" has already been ratified/accepted more than a month ago, but still some RIPE workers seem not to know this fact:
https://www.ripe.net/ripe/**policies/proposals/2011-06<https://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-06> Authors: Tobias Knecht, abusix Proposal Version: 3.0 06 June 2012 Accepted: 17 September 2012 Working Group: Anti-Abuse Working Group Proposal type: New Policy term: Indefinite New RIPE Document: ripe-563
Under §1.0 it says "The "abuse-c:" will be mandatory for all aut-nums. Due the hierarchical nature of IP address objects, at least every direct allocated inetnum and inet6num needs to have an "abuse-c:". Inherited objects might have their own "abuse-c:" attribute or they will be covered by the higher level objects. "
Today I got the following reply from RIPE (I removed the name of the sender with XXX, but can give it if required). Why is this person at RIPE still saying this: "At this moment is the 'abuse-c' not yet a mandatory field. There is currently a discussion on our mailing list in order to make this a mandatory field, but this policy proposal is still under discussion."
??? An official from RIPE please explain to the community what this RIPE person means with such a statement...:
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: NCC#2012103209 abuse-c for inetnum 84.200.75.0 - 84.200.75.127 missing Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:32:35 +0200 From: RIPE NCC <ncc@ripe.net> Reply-To: RIPE NCC <ncc@ripe.net> To: U.Mutlu <security@mutluit.com>
Dear madam/sir,
Thank you for your e-mail.
At this moment is the 'abuse-c' not yet a mandatory field. There is currently a discussion on our mailing list in order to make this a mandatory field, but this policy proposal is still under discussion.
You can find the contact details that we have on file at:
And: