Status of 2024-01 Revised IPv6 PI Assignment Policy ?
Dear Address Policy WG, There was a lot of traction related to 2024-01 during the last few months of 2024, but it seems this has fallen silent. Does anybody know the current status of said proposal? I'm asking this as the policy would help me quite a bit in regards to my network, as I currently have 9 different /48 PI assignments I would like to consolidate, preferrably without renumbering. (both objects and DNS-wise, with the nibble boundaries and whatnot) I also believe I am far from the only network with this issue, as some of the customers at my employer have noted similar issues at the time. Hence, I was following this proposal quite closely, and find it unfortunate to see no further information on it. I'm aware the PDP states that a 4-week inactivity constitutes a withdrawal, but I am curious if this is the case here? Looking forward to any further information or replies. :) Kind regards, Jori Vanneste
Dear Jori, Thank you for your questions. The status of current proposals can be viewed at https://www.ripe.net/community/policies/current-proposals/ According to the RIPE PDP, the APWG Chairs are not required to withdraw proposal 2024-01, as the author agreed with them within four weeks of the end of the Discussion phase that he would draft a new version and there's no deadline for submitting a new version for a new Discussion phase. The four-weeks deadline applies to the submission of the policy draft in case the proposal advances to the Review phase. Kind regards, Angela Dall'Ara Policy Officer RIPE NCC On 12/03/2025 09:58, Jori Vanneste wrote:
Dear Address Policy WG,
There was a lot of traction related to 2024-01 during the last few months of 2024, but it seems this has fallen silent.
Does anybody know the current status of said proposal?
I'm asking this as the policy would help me quite a bit in regards to my network, as I currently have 9 different /48 PI assignments I would like to consolidate, preferrably without renumbering. (both objects and DNS-wise, with the nibble boundaries and whatnot)
I also believe I am far from the only network with this issue, as some of the customers at my employer have noted similar issues at the time.
Hence, I was following this proposal quite closely, and find it unfortunate to see no further information on it.
I'm aware the PDP states that a 4-week inactivity constitutes a withdrawal, but I am curious if this is the case here?
Looking forward to any further information or replies. :)
Kind regards, Jori Vanneste
دوستان من ی درخواستی دارم ازتون بایدی گوشی راپیداکنم شماره تلفن وسریال وکد۱۵رقمیش روهم دارم لطفاکمکم کنین خیلی مهمه در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۱۲ مارس ۲۰۲۵، ۱۴:۱۹ Angela Dall'Ara <adallara@ripe.net> نوشت:
Dear Jori,
Thank you for your questions.
The status of current proposals can be viewed at https://www.ripe.net/community/policies/current-proposals/
According to the RIPE PDP, the APWG Chairs are not required to withdraw proposal 2024-01, as the author agreed with them within four weeks of the end of the Discussion phase that he would draft a new version and there's no deadline for submitting a new version for a new Discussion phase. The four-weeks deadline applies to the submission of the policy draft in case the proposal advances to the Review phase.
Kind regards,
Angela Dall'Ara Policy Officer RIPE NCC
On 12/03/2025 09:58, Jori Vanneste wrote:
Dear Address Policy WG,
There was a lot of traction related to 2024-01 during the last few months of 2024, but it seems this has fallen silent.
Does anybody know the current status of said proposal?
I'm asking this as the policy would help me quite a bit in regards to my network, as I currently have 9 different /48 PI assignments I would like to consolidate, preferrably without renumbering. (both objects and DNS-wise, with the nibble boundaries and whatnot)
I also believe I am far from the only network with this issue, as some of the customers at my employer have noted similar issues at the time.
Hence, I was following this proposal quite closely, and find it unfortunate to see no further information on it.
I'm aware the PDP states that a 4-week inactivity constitutes a withdrawal, but I am curious if this is the case here?
Looking forward to any further information or replies. :)
Kind regards, Jori Vanneste
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
دوستان من شمابهترین ن هستین لطفاکمکم کنین گوشی را مکان یابی کنم باتشکر در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۱۲ مارس ۲۰۲۵، ۱۶:۱۴ elahemosavi <elahemosavi350@gmail.com> نوشت:
دوستان من ی درخواستی دارم ازتون بایدی گوشی راپیداکنم شماره تلفن وسریال وکد۱۵رقمیش روهم دارم لطفاکمکم کنین خیلی مهمه
در تاریخ چهارشنبه ۱۲ مارس ۲۰۲۵، ۱۴:۱۹ Angela Dall'Ara <adallara@ripe.net> نوشت:
Dear Jori,
Thank you for your questions.
The status of current proposals can be viewed at https://www.ripe.net/community/policies/current-proposals/
According to the RIPE PDP, the APWG Chairs are not required to withdraw proposal 2024-01, as the author agreed with them within four weeks of the end of the Discussion phase that he would draft a new version and there's no deadline for submitting a new version for a new Discussion phase. The four-weeks deadline applies to the submission of the policy draft in case the proposal advances to the Review phase.
Kind regards,
Angela Dall'Ara Policy Officer RIPE NCC
On 12/03/2025 09:58, Jori Vanneste wrote:
Dear Address Policy WG,
There was a lot of traction related to 2024-01 during the last few months of 2024, but it seems this has fallen silent.
Does anybody know the current status of said proposal?
I'm asking this as the policy would help me quite a bit in regards to my network, as I currently have 9 different /48 PI assignments I would like to consolidate, preferrably without renumbering. (both objects and DNS-wise, with the nibble boundaries and whatnot)
I also believe I am far from the only network with this issue, as some of the customers at my employer have noted similar issues at the time.
Hence, I was following this proposal quite closely, and find it unfortunate to see no further information on it.
I'm aware the PDP states that a 4-week inactivity constitutes a withdrawal, but I am curious if this is the case here?
Looking forward to any further information or replies. :)
Kind regards, Jori Vanneste
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
participants (3)
-
Angela Dall'Ara -
elahemosavi -
Jori Vanneste