Actually you want RFC 8950. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8950 On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 07:55 Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
If we think router vendors are in a position to reliably support v4 AF over BGP in v6, and actually route this traffic
Will Hargrave wrote on 08/11/2022 13:48: this is kinda the problem with RFC 5549, no? I.e. it deals only with signaling rather than transport. So even if it's deployed, the IXP will still need to provide ipv4 addresses for transport purposes.
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
-- =============================================== David Farmer Email:farmer@umn.edu Networking & Telecommunication Services Office of Information Technology University of Minnesota 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 612-626-0815 Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 612-812-9952 ===============================================