Actually you want RFC 8950.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8950


On Tue, Nov 8, 2022 at 07:55 Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
Will Hargrave wrote on 08/11/2022 13:48:
> If we think router vendors are in a position to reliably support v4
> AF over BGP in v6, and actually route this traffic
this is kinda the problem with RFC 5549, no?  I.e. it deals only with
signaling rather than transport. So even if it's deployed, the IXP will
still need to provide ipv4 addresses for transport purposes.

Nick

--

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================