On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Fil <koalafil@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
On 22 Sep 2013, at 22:45, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Filiz, if I could ask you one thing: is the only reason why you're
opposing
2013-03 this particular wording:
Yes.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 06:56:24PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
Accordingly, I think following will be a more appropriate wording:
3. LIR must demonstrate its need for the IPv4 address space and must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation.
replacing what you proposed: 3. The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation
That is, if that particular sentence were changed in this specific way, you would support the policy change?
Yes.
Thank you, Gert, for asking the penetrating question, and thank you, Filiz, for the succinct response. Before this, I had read through the proposal and a whole bunch of emails again in order to try to understand what Filiz was on about, and had I just waited a day, this would have been a huge time saver. :) -- Jan