On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Fil <koalafil@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

On 22 Sep 2013, at 22:45, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
>
> Filiz, if I could ask you one thing: is the only reason why you're opposing
> 2013-03 this particular wording:
>

Yes.

> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 06:56:24PM +0200, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
>>> Accordingly, I think following will be a more appropriate wording:
>>>
>>> 3. LIR must demonstrate its need for the IPv4 address space and must
>>> confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation.
>>>
>>> replacing what you proposed:
>>> 3. The LIR must confirm it will make assignment(s) from the allocation
>
>
> That is, if that particular sentence were changed in this specific way,
> you would support the policy change?
>

Yes.

Thank you, Gert, for asking the penetrating question, and thank you, Filiz, for the succinct response.

Before this, I had read through the proposal and a whole bunch of emails again in order to try to understand what Filiz was on about, and had I just waited a day, this would have been a huge time saver. :)

--
Jan