Hi Roger, On 08/05/14 00:00, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 03:57:25PM -0500, Lu Heng wrote:
I personally believe we might no longer need to distinguish PI and PA--it might solve all the question all together. We tried to go there, the WG rejected the proposal... and I can understand that, as the complications in the actual implementations are significant. Hmm as I remember there was no rejection of the idea, more a cancellation of the started work due to the implication and complication involved in getting done.
it was rejected mostly because it would have caused a lot of changes and it was too complex. I still have the idea to come back and do it with a step-by-step approach but I haven't yet managed to decide what would be the first step :-) elvis -- <http://v4escrow.net> Elvis Daniel Velea Chief Business Analyst Email: elvis@V4Escrow.net <mailto:elvis@v4escrow.net> US Phone: +1 (702) 475 5914 EU Phone: +3 (161) 458 1914 Recognised IPv4 Broker/Facilitator in: This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original.Any other use of this email is strictly prohibited.
