Should Two Letter TLDs Be Immune ?
On Monday, April 27, 1998 12:17 PM, Steve Heflin[SMTP:steve at domainbank.net] wrote: <snip> @ @Now, making a statement of registry guidelines and recommendations, that @is good idea. How do we proceed? @> For starters, I think that the contact information for the TLD should be an actual government contact. The problem that I see with this is that it may be very difficult to find anyone in some of the government agencies that knows anything about the TLD delegation or the Registry Industry. What would you do in that case ? Will there be two-letter TLDs that are non-government ? (i.e. privately held) - Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI http://www.nic.vi -------- Logged at Mon Apr 27 23:38:19 MET DST 1998 ---------
Why don't we establish a set of guidelines or purported guidelines we feel may be pertinent, *then* move forward with issues regarding each? [not purposely avoiding the question] ;)
For starters, I think that the contact information for the TLD should be an actual government contact.
The problem that I see with this is that it may be very difficult to find anyone in some of the government agencies that knows anything about the TLD delegation or the Registry Industry.
What would you do in that case ?
Will there be two-letter TLDs that are non-government ? (i.e. privately held)
- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI
Regards Steve Heflin Domain Bank, Inc. IDomains, Inc. -------- Logged at Mon Apr 27 23:55:07 MET DST 1998 ---------
participants (2)
-
JimFleming＠doorstep.unety.net -
steve＠domainbank.net