In a message dated 98-02-12 11:41:14 EST, jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com writes: << Setting restrictions for participation such as signing th MoU do not lend themselves to this. Hence you now do not have any thing close to a consensus of the internet community as a whole or of the Stakeholders >> YOU DID NOT HAVE TO SIGN THE GTLD-MOU to become a member of CORE. How many times must this be said before you get it???? -------- Logged at Thu Feb 12 18:39:50 MET 1998 ---------
All and whomever sent this E-Mail response, CirqueFan at aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 98-02-12 11:41:14 EST, jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com writes:
<< Setting restrictions for participation such as signing th MoU do not lend themselves to this. Hence you now do not have any thing close to a consensus of the internet community as a whole or of the Stakeholders >>
YOU DID NOT HAVE TO SIGN THE GTLD-MOU to become a member of CORE.
That is not what the MoU says.
How many times must this be said before you get it????
Regards, -- Jeffrey A. Williams DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng. Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC. E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com -------- Logged at Thu Feb 12 20:31:20 MET 1998 ---------
CirqueFan at aol.com wrote:
YOU DID NOT HAVE TO SIGN THE GTLD-MOU to become a member of CORE.
How many times must this be said before you get it????
Maybe not but you have to dish out US$10,000 and more, with a US$300,000 line of credit etc. And they're not taking any more applications and I won't a penny to any damn group like this especially since they're selling what has amounted to VAPOUR and will in all probablity continue to be VAPOUR. How many times do you people have to hear that before it sinks in? Enduring, I remain... TeleVirtually Yours, Bob Allisat http://www.wtv.net http://www.fcn.net -------- Logged at Thu Feb 12 19:38:14 MET 1998 ---------
participants (3)
-
bob＠wtv.net -
CirqueFan＠aol.com -
jwkckid1＠ix.netcom.com