[ AURSC ] Application for New TLD's
At 11:23 AM 9/9/98 +0200, W.Sylwestrzak at icm.edu.pl wrote:
Er, what are you talking about ? what is all this G3, IPv8 etc ? never heard about it ...
IPv8 is a figment of Jim's imagination. People see his emails and begin to think that perhaps there is some technology they missed in their reading, so they ask around, and Jim is more than happy to reply. Think about someone who places a URL of 5 and 12 year old technical books in his sig that he once wrote. Most people on the Internet have him in their email filters so as not to see his stuff since it proves to be a large waste of time. -Hank
--w
The answer to your first question is... the TLD authorities in G3...I have not looked at G3 lately but many of the TLDs in the European region were in there. I have copied some of the people that might have an interest. If I recall, there were some new people added for Poland. I am not sure where they stand. That is for the people in that region to work out. This is what self-governance is all about.
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
I am not sure there is one web site for G3 or one e-mail address. In theory there should be about 256 of them. You should be able to query the DNS to find all of the G3 info, just like G6.
G3 self-governance will depend on the TLD authorities in that region. If they work together they will have a nice neighbor net situation. They can start selling, leasing, or giving away IPv8 addresses to be used with IPv6 now, once they have their G:S number.
If they make a mess of it, that is their mess. C'est la vie.
Jim Fleming Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.com End-2-End: VPC(Java)---C+ at ---<IPv8>---C+ at ---(Java)VPC http://www.ddj.com/index/author/idx10133.htm UNETY Systems, Inc. - http://www.unety.net
-------- Logged at Wed Sep 9 11:44:13 MET DST 1998 ---------
Hank Nussbacher
At 11:23 AM 9/9/98 +0200, W.Sylwestrzak at icm.edu.pl wrote:
Er, what are you talking about ? what is all this G3, IPv8 etc ? never heard about it ...
IPv8 is a figment of Jim's imagination. People see his emails and begin to think that perhaps there is some technology they missed in their reading, so they ask around, and Jim is more than happy to reply. Think about someone who places a URL of 5 and 12 year old technical books in his sig that he once wrote. Most people on the Internet have him in their email filters so as not to see his stuff since it proves to be a large waste of time.
-Hank
Well, wouldn't it be more efficient to filter such things at the listserv instead then ? I'm sure it would safe many people lots of time ... Or isn't it possible to exclude certain emails from some mailing lists for excessive off-topic postings, if this is the case ? That would be a normal practice and would be favoured by people subscribing to focused discussion lists, such as RIPE WG lists. shouldn't be a hard thing to do ... --w -------- Logged at Wed Sep 9 11:46:18 MET DST 1998 ---------
Filtering the RIPE WG lists has been suggested earlier. In the discussions there was consensus that content or sender based filters are a dangerous proposition because the RIPE WG should be as open as possible. Therefore we currently filter only messages which are clearly commercial spam. I personally think that it is much better if everyone decides indicidually whether to read particular messages. I for one completely filter anything from Jim Fleming. Daniel
"W.Sylwestrzak at icm.edu.pl" <wojsyl1 at icm.edu.pl> writes:
Well, wouldn't it be more efficient to filter such things at the listserv instead then ? I'm sure it would safe many people lots of time ...
Or isn't it possible to exclude certain emails from some mailing lists for excessive off-topic postings, if this is the case ? That would be a normal practice and would be favoured by people subscribing to focused discussion lists, such as RIPE WG lists.
shouldn't be a hard thing to do ...
-------- Logged at Wed Sep 9 16:17:54 MET DST 1998 ---------
participants (3)
-
Daniel.Karrenberg＠ripe.net -
hank＠ibm.net.il -
wojsyl1＠icm.edu.pl