.GP, .TM, .TV and .MQ to be Removed ?
-----Original Message----- From: Daniel Karrenberg <Daniel.Karrenberg at ripe.net> <snip>
I have no idea. Ask Jon Postel.
No, read rfc1591. The possible ccTLDs are defined by the United Nations and published by ISO as ISO standard 3166. The IANA has -very wiselty- decided to use that list and not get involved in arguments exemplified by this thread.
Using a list is one thing, assigning the TLDs to various "managers" is another. Are you saying that Jon Postel's decisions are supposed to over-rule countries like France ? What happens if two groups in a country claim to be the authority ? What about the ccTLDs that have no country ? Will RIPE be handling those ? What ever happened to all of those bogus statements about IP addresses and Domain Names having nothing to do with each other ? Was that just to divert the attention of the U.S. government officials ? Why doesn't RIPE just admit that they are interested in both IP addresses and TLDs ? Isn't that more honest ? Jim Fleming Unir Corporation - http://www.unir.com End-2-End: VPC(Java)---C+ at ---<IPv8>---C+ at ---(Java)VPC http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt http://www.ddj.com/index/author/idx10133.htm -------- Logged at Tue Sep 15 16:40:29 MET DST 1998 ---------
[The 1/1000 exception to my policy of not reading/responding Jim Fleming messages. Actually I start to believe that this 'Jim Fleming' is an 'eliza' like prank pulled by someone with considerably less humour than Prof Weizenbaum.]
"Jim Fleming" <JimFleming at unety.net> writes:
Using a list is one thing, assigning the TLDs to various "managers" is another. Are you saying that Jon Postel's decisions are supposed to over-rule countries like France ?
see rfc1591
What happens if two groups in a country claim to be the authority ?
see rfc1591
What about the ccTLDs that have no country ?
see rfc1591
Will RIPE be handling those ?
no
What ever happened to all of those bogus statements about IP addresses and Domain Names having nothing to do with each other ? Was that just to divert the attention of the U.S. government officials ?
I am not aware of any such bogus statements.
Why doesn't RIPE just admit that they are interested in both IP addresses and TLDs ? Isn't that more honest ?
See http://www.ripe.net/home/daniel/euro-notes.html http://www.ripe.net/docs/ripe-001.html -------- Logged at Mon Sep 14 18:08:21 MET DST 1998 ---------
participants (2)
-
Daniel.Karrenberg@ripe.net -
JimFleming@unety.net