It goes back to the original comment. Good idea, we can suggest it but we cannot force them to do it. On Mon, 27 Apr 1998, Jim Fleming wrote:

On Monday, April 27, 1998 12:37 PM, Steve Heflin[SMTP:steve at domainbank.net] wrote: @Why don't we establish a set of guidelines or purported guidelines we feel @may be pertinent, *then* move forward with issues regarding each? @ @[not purposely avoiding the question] ;) @

One of the things that I have advocated in the past is the 2+2+4 Trustee structure. This is a structure that allows 8 people to be identified as the delegates of a resource such as a TLD.

5_________ 3_________ 6_________ 1_________ 2_________ 7_________ 4_________ 8_________

With this structure the people in the #1 and #2 positions are viewed as the co-Trustees and share the job. They speak for the TLD when an official statement is needed. Each of them has an assistant (#3 and #4). Then each of those people has two people to help provide more community coverage and voices.

I wonder if each of the 2 letter TLDs could publish such a list ?

- Jim Fleming Unir Corporation IBC, Tortola, BVI

http://www.nic.vi

Regards Steve Heflin Domain Bank, Inc. IDomains, Inc. -------- Logged at Tue Apr 28 03:08:00 MET DST 1998 ---------