[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Please use caution when opening attachments from unrecognised sources.
This proposal might be well intentioned, but as currently written is riddled with issues
1.4 Is it a listing in a blocklist or a report from a National CERT?
Why would a CERT be contacting RIPE about issues with an AS number? It potentially is an escalation of non-response, but that’s not what the document says
1.5 I don’t think the WG is really qualified to do this. While members of the WG might have deep experience in many aspects of security I cannot see how the group would suddenly morph into being arbiters of this. Same with respect to 3.2 - I’d also see this
as being open to gaming
2.1 define “systematically”
3.4 that assumes that blocklist operators will remove IP ranges in a timely fashion or following some kind of logical process. While some of the bigger ones might, some of the smaller ones might not
3.5 “explicitly” - what does that mean?
Same with “proportionate”
What exactly are these proposed restrictions?
These are just my initial observations
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
I have sent this email at a time that is convenient for me. I do not expect you to respond to it outside of your usual working hours.