RE: LAST CALL REQUEST - draft-blunk-rpslng-01.txt
May I assume that all the references are NORMATIVE ??
yes, they need to be labeled properly. but i do not think [3] is. and it needs a ripe doc number. randy
Randy, We can split the references into normative and not and give the number for the RIPE doc in [3] I think the draft was finished before the new requirement to explicitly label references as (non-)normative. Shall this be done now or after the last call is over? Joao On Tuesday, Aug 26, 2003, at 13:37 Europe/Amsterdam, Randy Bush wrote:
May I assume that all the references are NORMATIVE ??
yes, they need to be labeled properly.
but i do not think [3] is. and it needs a ripe doc number.
randy
Shall this be done now or after the last call is over?
plan to cut a new draft between last call and iesg review but i find the comments on the likelyhood of change to be interesting. in particular, what changes? randy
On Tuesday, Aug 26, 2003, at 14:01 Europe/Amsterdam, Randy Bush wrote:
Shall this be done now or after the last call is over?
plan to cut a new draft between last call and iesg review
OK.
but i find the comments on the likelyhood of change to be interesting. in particular, what changes?
I don't think anyone has any particular changes in mind. I believe it was just a query about the possibility of change in case it is necessary, since ietf docs, once published are perceived as not to be altered in any way.
randy
Joao
participants (3)
-
Joao Damas -
Joao Damas -
Randy Bush