18 Aug
2006
18 Aug
'06
4:08 p.m.
Denis Walker wrote:
It would seem sensible to follow the draft rather than create confusion by trying something different. Of course some implements may not have a bounds check on the max size of an AS number.
But they may consider it to be an integer and the new syntax will be x.y.
I should have made it clearer that the two comments were separate. I think that it would be best to reflect the usage in the draft but it might also be the case that the current software would "support" a single integer purely because the size of the number wasn't checked. Mark.