All,

First of all thanks to Petrit, the co-authors and all who have participated in the discussion around the proposal. 

It is what it is. Too bad some voices are apparently heard more then others. 

Cheers,
Melchior


> Op 9 jul. 2020 om 16:33 heeft Massimiliano Stucchi <max@stucchi.ch> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> Hi Jordi,
> 
>>> On 09/07/2020 16:18, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via routing-wg wrote:
>> The point is that without a clear summary of what was the discussion, this conclusion that the chairs are summarizing, is not obvious, and in that case, we two ways:
>> 1) appeal
>> 2) sending a new proposal
> 
>> We can even do both of them.
> 
> While of course we - as proposers - are not happy about the outcome, we
> are not going to appeal nor send a new proposal, as the general feeling
> is that there is no interest.  We have tried with two different
> approaches and it didn't work out, so it's better to focus on something
> else.
> 
> If you want to go on and make a similar, new proposal, feel free to do so.
> 
> Ciao!
> -- 
> Massimiliano Stucchi
> MS16801-RIPE
> Twitter/Telegram: @stucchimax