Dear all,
TL;DR: Perhaps it is time to add 2002::/16 to our EBGP bogon filters?
It is kind of strange that in the default-free zone (where we don’t announce defaults to each other) - we will propagate what is effectively an IPv4 default-route, in the IPv6 DFZ.
IETF has politely abandoned the prefix:
Wes George highlighted operational problems from accepting 2002::/16 on the data-plane slide 6:
Is there still really any legit reason left to accept, or propagate, 2002::/16 on EBGP sessions in the DFZ?
Kind regards,
Job