Jeroen Massar wrote:
Btw, if you postponed the 'experiment', how come I did pick up this one:
84.205.73.0/24 12654 12654 {1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221,1221, 1221,1221,1221,1221,1221}
That path was announced during the window of notice we had given for the announcements. However, you will notice that that was not the complete set of announcements we intended to make, which included 25-, 50-, 75-. and 100-element AS-sets. Since we were not able to send all the announcements within the window of notice we had provided, we postponed them to avoid sending announcements when people were not expecting them.
PS: Is the 'technical difficulty' your own router falling over? :)
No. :) Regards, Lorenzo -- lorenzo@ripe.net colitti@dia.uniroma3.it www.ripe.net www.dia.uniroma3.it/~compunet RIPE NCC Roma Tre Computer Networks research group