Shane, all,
Perhaps people should be encouraged to search recent routing-wg archives for latest discussions, or to ask the working group for recommendations if there are none that seem to apply?
Thanks for providing me with a link to fill in my interpretation of the discussion last Wednesday. :) The summary is that Philip and myself will scrap this document and work to revise RIPE-399 with more IPv6 examples and ensure use of routing registries is stressed. A slightly longer description (and I hope this matches what shows up in the minutes, but my memory isn't what it used to be) is that it would be foolhardy, and the document admits to the difficulties, to try and document any specific prefix-length based filter. Instead, the general principles of good aggregation should be stressed whilst admitting there are occasions that you may need to advertise longer prefixes. Existing filters of /32 may have to go the ways of IPv4 filters that were based on registry allocation sizes, but that is something that the network operator community will decide -- again, something that is already mentioned in the discussion part of the document. More discussion is of course welcome on the list. Rob -- Rob Evans JANET(UK) Development Team Twitter: https://twitter.com/JANETDev/team Work tweets: https://twitter.com/internetplumber JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG