On Fri, Jun 6, 2025 at 7:23 AM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:
Hi,

On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 07:05:01AM -0500, David Farmer via routing-wg wrote:
> However, it might also be a good idea for revocations to occur only on a
> regularly scheduled and published day and time rather than somewhat
> randomly throughout the month. For example, revocations should occur at
> noon UTC on the first Tuesday of the month, unless that is a
> public holiday, then on the second Tuesday of the month. The point being to
> avoid surprises to the extent possible.

Don't you think it does not matter at all on which time and day you
remove a delegation when that has been broken for more than 3 months?

If the CA has been broken for 3 months, it is broken and can be removed. However, it doesn't need to happen exactly at 90 days. And it is probably a bad idea to do it on a public holiday or the weekend. All I'm suggesting is that good change practices are followed and that the change occurs regularly on a well-known, published day and time. That way, if something unforeseen happens, we don't have to wonder if a revocation occurred, unless it is that day of the month. Do I expect anything to happen? No! But!

Further, this doesn't need to be in the policy itself; I trust the NCC to do the right thing, but it doesn't hurt to communicate our expectations.

Thanks.
--
===============================================
David Farmer               Email:farmer@umn.edu
Networking & Telecommunication Services
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota  
2218 University Ave SE        Phone: 612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029   Cell: 612-812-9952
===============================================