Hi, as a casual reader of the reports Tony and Jessica automatically send out by the end of each week I feel that it is now pertinent to present a couple of points and invite some comments. While some people are contributing their share by continuing to withdraw routes by actively using CIDR, I cannot avoid observing the fact that some of the larger and more well-respected Internet service providers week after week remain on the list of the "Top 10" ASes which could contribute substantially to the reduction of the IP routing table size by more actively using CIDR. It is perhaps time to ask again why these service providers appear not to contribute their share to the common good? What activities (besides these weekly automated postings here) are ongoing to push and guide these service providers in the right direction? It seems clear that posting the "top 10" list although a useful thing in itself, is not enough to provide the necessary push. IMHO service providers on the list should feel a little more guilty than they apparently do right now. Comments? Regards, - Havard